placestats

Petroleum County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population401
Density0.1people per km² of land
Median household income$59,318
Land area4288km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Petroleum County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Garfield County, MT, Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, AK, McPherson County, NE, Blaine County, NE, Carter County, MT, Clark County, ID, Slope County, ND, Sioux County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Petroleum Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Private job growth23.3100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.6 sd
High cholesterol27.3%100th pct98th pct -1.4 sd
Economy score0.1658th pct by value16th pct by value -1.3 sd
Share now married71.7%90th pct by value100th pct by value +1.3 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population84.9%88th pct by value81st pct by value +1.2 sd
Per capita personal income$40,3922nd pct5th pct -1.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adults under 65 without health insurance9.6%6459-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain2,675 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.5%2449+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability28.1%7077-0.6CDC PLACES
Arthritis23.7%4060+0.2CDC PLACES
Binge drinking23%83+1.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate038·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate034·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2611+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents5.0442·37·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.2%4243-0.1Census SAIPE
Cholesterol screening79.5%407-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.9%6473-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.9%6270-0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.5%8858+1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people40.336·88·-0.5
Coronary heart disease5.3%7078-0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%4039+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.6%5669-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.5%6469+0.4CDC PLACES
Depression24.4%3245+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.2%9095-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.60368·74·+0.5
Economy score0.1658·16·-1.3
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.72651·41·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed230———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents08·1·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health16.7%6679-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.33893-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.29%7313+0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.6%8688-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.3%4255+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.8%5066-0.3CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4215677-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$21,556k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.50340·22·-0.1
Hearing disability7.3%5031-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.5%7889-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.3%10098-1.4CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate77%63·65·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.7%8390-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units295———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7.6%6474-0.4CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,29124·23·-0.6
Jail population rate17330·12·-0.5
Labour force239———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.5%6674-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22%5170-0.4CDC PLACES
Loneliness31.4%5483-0.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2.4242·14·-0.6
Mammography in the past two years72.3%5239+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.6171·71·+0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$47,89173-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work14.2 min7097-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age51.5 years76·95·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$76941·31·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$173,70046·51·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,318—38—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$50,1641014-1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,26155·37·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0785-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.6%8686-0.6CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate070·35·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity20.6%8089-0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity32.9%6885-0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units200———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents090·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents048·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units uncertain154———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return420———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return214·24·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move358———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,8778479+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$40,39225-1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$21,933k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population543———BEA Regional Accounts
Population554———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over350———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over454———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over328———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain112———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain72———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined401———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined554———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago356———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain89———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census496———
Poverty rate (model-based)13%6254-0.3Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000306———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004292———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008300———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012298———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016322———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020348———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024324———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population84.9%88·81·+1.2
Private job growth23.3100·99·+2.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs37———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps8.2%23·13·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents7.464·0·-0.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200087.681·100·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200480.648·95·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200876.943·92·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20128348·95·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201690.367·98·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202088.455·97·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.555·96·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20240.88724·23·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%66·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%34·1·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains30.4%62·97·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%74·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year67.5%16·3·-0.9CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%7482-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.9%69·94·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%46·24·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%90·5·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain14.6%84·87·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race0%20·1·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago uncertain88.8%46·59·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married uncertain71.7%90·100·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%85·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic0%—2·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic uncertain99.3%96·100·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain27.1%7271+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.9%6284-0.4CDC PLACES
Stroke2.8%6476-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.7%34·8·-0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed230———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken612———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.9%7481-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population401———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.0401—3—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed9———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.8%3036+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain32.2%58·92·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain95———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4%8083-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain55———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute uncertain188———Census ACS 5-year

18of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.