placestats

Sioux County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1197
Density0.2people per km² of land
Median household income$54,076
Land area5353km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Sioux County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Clark County, ID, Kiowa County, CO, Carter County, MT, Golden Valley County, MT, Meagher County, MT, Mineral County, CO, Wheeler County, OR, Custer County, ID. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Sioux Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Homeownership rate56.5%2nd pct by value4th pct by value -1.9 sd
Taking blood pressure medication60.2%100th pct by value78th pct by value +1.8 sd
Returns reporting capital gains42%94th pct by value100th pct by value +1.6 sd
Obesity43.5%6th pct8th pct +1.6 sd
Effective property tax rate1.2191st pct by value76th pct by value +1.6 sd
Median property tax bill1,72194th pct by value57th pct by value +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5697697+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11%4044-0.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain11,515 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.4%3918+0.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.3%8079-0.6CDC PLACES
Any disability31.2%4854-0.1CDC PLACES
Arthritis24.1%3454+0.1CDC PLACES
Binge drinking21.1%4012+0.6CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.2
Business closing rate032·2·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate032·2·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%3619+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.566·62·+0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.5%4837-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort296———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.2%406-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.6%1632+0.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15%6668-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.3%5023+0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.226·81·-0.7
Coronary heart disease6.6%1219+0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.8%7485-0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.2%1826+0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year55.7%2835-0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.5627·18·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression19.5%8291-1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.2%1641+0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.081534·42·-0.1
Economy score1.1686·69·+0.8
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.2191·76·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed589———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.960·41·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health19.5%3853-0.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.87497-0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.27%6010+0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17%2940+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress16.7%6683-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.5%4653-0.1CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.3869497-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$104,180k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.20564·38·+0.4
Hearing disability8.2%2410+0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.5%1042+0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.5%3482+0.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate56.5%2·4·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.4%3756-0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units682———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability9%3644+0.1CDC PLACES
Labour force602———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.1%3443-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21%7184-0.6CDC PLACES
Loneliness30.3%7193-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents11.868·78·+0.3
Mammography in the past two years68.7%2815-0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.46371·63·+0.5
Mean income of departing households$51,48057·46·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21 min2673+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.5 years20·50·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$74348·25·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$141,70037·33·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$54,076—25—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$61,3448046+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,72194·57·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0645-0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.5%2846+0.2CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate070·35·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity29.3%831+1.0CDC PLACES
Obesity43.5%68+1.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units457———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0944·21·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units258———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return940———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·41·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move877———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,6501828-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$85,5518695+1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$98,469k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,151———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,154———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over985———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over947———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over842———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over286———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain137———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain166———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,197———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,153———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,137———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher211———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,135———
Poverty rate uncertain11.4%6766-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain14.4%5243-0.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000752———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004809———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008732———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012739———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016736———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020729———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024678———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,0544877-0.3County Health Rankings
Private job growth5.1571·87·+0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs102———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps14.3%74·60·+0.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents39.340·30·-0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200086.589·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200484.681·98·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200883.887·98·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201286.185·97·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201688.468·96·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.985·98·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.677·96·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242.0640·26·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%62·5·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit4%30·1·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains42%94·100·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%72·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.4%76·25·+0.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%2234+0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.9%36·82·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%45·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain5.58%7·1·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago95%90·99·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.4%57·23·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married63.7%72·97·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94%88·92·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.4%20·38·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher25.1%6065+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.3%6681-0.5CDC PLACES
Stroke3.4%2030+0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.2%100·78·+1.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed500———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken826———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.4%2942+0.1CDC PLACES
Total population1,197———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed13———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.2%7893-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate33%64·92·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units225———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.5%2637+0.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain282———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute549———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.