placestats

McPherson County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population463
Density0.2people per km² of land
Median household income$61,316
Land area2226km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like McPherson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Blaine County, NE, Slope County, ND, Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, AK, Borden County, TX, Golden Valley County, MT, Wrangell City and Borough, AK, Hinsdale County, CO, Phillips County, MT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where McPherson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Returns reporting capital gains45%100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.7 sd
Share now married74.7%94th pct by value100th pct by value +1.7 sd
Share widowed4.38%8th pct by value6th pct by value -1.6 sd
Poverty rate7.13%94th pct93rd pct -1.5 sd
Taking blood pressure medication59.2%98th pct by value65th pct by value +1.5 sd
Mainline Protestant adherents22.190th pct by value93rd pct by value +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5566096+0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain7.6%9488-1.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain4,105 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%5894-1.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.6%7477-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability27%8885-0.9CDC PLACES
Arthritis22.5%6677-0.5CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.3%266+0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate038·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate032·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.6%126+0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents026·6·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18.2%5648-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort129———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening82%6834+0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.8%7475-0.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.7%9093-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55%5228+0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people50.158·95·-0.0
Coronary heart disease5.5%5468-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.6%8489-1.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.4%5871-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.7%4048-0.3CDC PLACES
Depression19.1%8293-1.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.2%5281-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.82386·85·+0.8
Economy score1.0666·64·+0.4
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.0679·67·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Employed236———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents11.538·27·-0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health14.9%9093-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.34093-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%7215+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.5%8789-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.5%8693-1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.4%9090-1.1CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.3769698-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$36,156k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.40840·27·-0.1
Hearing disability6.9%7048-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30%5076-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.7%5890-0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate73%36·43·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.1%8995-0.8CDC PLACES
Housing units259———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7.1%8686-0.8CDC PLACES
Labour force246———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.6%8991-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support19.6%9597-0.9CDC PLACES
Loneliness29.8%8996-1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents22.190·93·+1.4
Mammography in the past two years71.6%4633+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.98698·91·+1.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$65,0455340-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work19.1 min4284+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.6 years56·84·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$65320·10·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$124,20028·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,316—44—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,1742027-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,32064·40·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0725-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.7%8085-0.7CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate068·35·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity25.3%2459+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity39.3%1238+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units196———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents050·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units143———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return410———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return282·89·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move359———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,2794253-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$87,0379095+1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$32,813k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population377———BEA Regional Accounts
Population383———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over388———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over316———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over332———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain100———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line46———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined463———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined383———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago405———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain81———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census399———
Poverty rate uncertain7.13%9493-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12%6862-0.5Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000301———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004312———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008293———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012291———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016287———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020302———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024283———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Prison population rate3,435—100·—
Private job growth042·26·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs28———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps uncertain8.7%35·17·-0.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents33.628·18·-0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200083.662·98·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200484.167·98·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.278·99·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201285.362·97·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201694.893·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202094.291·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202495.791·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.182·61·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%64·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%34·1·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains45%100·100·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%76·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74%98·37·+1.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%7682-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain21.6%24·68·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%55·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%88·14·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race0%20·1·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.5%30·42·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married19.3%27·3·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married74.7%94·100·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%89·11·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic99.4%98·100·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.38%8·6·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain24.4%5362+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.4%5481-0.2CDC PLACES
Stroke2.8%6476-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.2%98·65·+1.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed200———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken754———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.7%8184-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population463———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed10———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.1%1827+0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain24.3%24·81·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain63———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.9%8685-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain95———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute215———Census ACS 5-year

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.