placestats

Blaine County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population385
Density0.2people per km² of land
Median household income$61,250
Land area1841km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Blaine County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: McPherson County, NE, Slope County, ND, Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, AK, Golden Valley County, MT, Borden County, TX, Phillips County, MT, Wrangell City and Borough, AK, Hinsdale County, CO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Blaine Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Congregations per 10,000 people116100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.2 sd
Net business formation rate27.398th pct by value100th pct by value +2.9 sd
Business opening rate27.396th pct by value100th pct by value +2.3 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.5212nd pct4th pct +1.9 sd
Share now married75.2%96th pct by value100th pct by value +1.8 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$40,9700th pct0th pct -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.64496100+1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.6%8674-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain3,385 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%5794-0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10%8686-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability27.7%8480-0.7CDC PLACES
Arthritis22.5%6677-0.5CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.3%246+0.8CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 500—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate038·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate27.396·100·+2.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%5632+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents026·6·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain26.1%1217+1.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0%—0·—County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort137———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%5820+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6%6071-0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.3%8289-1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.7%6034+0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people116100·100·+3.2
Coronary heart disease5.5%5668-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.7%8087-0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.5%4258+0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.6%5264+0.2CDC PLACES
Depression19.2%8092-1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.4%4276-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.69778·79·+0.6
Economy score0.71132·44·-0.4
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.1986·74·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed241———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents48.592·92·+1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health15.8%8687-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.25194-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.18%303-0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.4%6580-0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population0———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.9%7690-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.7%8486-0.9CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality uncertain0.52124+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$42,230k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.99910·6·-1.2
Hearing disability7%6644-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.9%3067+0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.4%3883-0.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate71.4%28·36·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.7%7890-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units295———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7.4%7079-0.5CDC PLACES
Labour force250———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7%7884-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.8%7387-0.5CDC PLACES
Loneliness31.2%5185-0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.264·72·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years73.7%8051+0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.029519·35·-0.8
Mean adjusted gross income per return$40,97000-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain19.9 min3680+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age56.8 years94·99·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$78654·35·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$102,10011·10·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,250—44—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$52,5121020-1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,21147·35·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0725-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.1%7080-0.5CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate27.398·100·+2.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity26.3%2051+0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity38.8%1843+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units192———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents052·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units137———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return450———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return258·67·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move372———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain$41,3198882+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$82,3488093+0.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$35,492k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population431———BEA Regional Accounts
Population436———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over314———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over344———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over301———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over131———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain41———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain71———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined385———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined436———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago367———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain77———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census431———
Poverty rate uncertain10.6%6772-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain16.3%2230+0.7Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000349———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004339———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008316———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012303———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016317———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020317———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024291———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth4.2664·81·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs49———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps9.5%49·24·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents58.766·73·+0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200087.482·100·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200488.887·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200886.187·99·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201290.282·99·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201690.264·98·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202088.958·97·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202487.142·94·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-0.31913·19·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%66·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%36·1·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains43.5%94·100·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%78·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.4%74·25·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%6877-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over34%94·99·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%57·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%88·14·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race0%20·1·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago95.3%90·99·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married75.2%96·100·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic0%—2·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic100%100·100·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain25.6%6566+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.6%5080-0.2CDC PLACES
Stroke2.8%6476-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.8%82·59·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed230———IRS Statistics of Income
Threat of utility shut-off7%6879-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population385———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed9———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%3443+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain34.9%68·94·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain103———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%7079-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain47———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year0———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute170———Census ACS 5-year

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.