placestats

Slope County, ND

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population795
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$62,500
Land area3148km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Slope County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Blaine County, NE, McPherson County, NE, Borden County, TX, Wrangell City and Borough, AK, Hinsdale County, CO, Cherry County, NE, Garfield County, UT, Roberts County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Slope Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Health score-1.52nd pct by value1st pct by value -2.4 sd
Per capita income$44,03498th pct88th pct +2.3 sd
Median property tax bill4602nd pct by value4th pct by value -2.0 sd
Homeownership rate87.4%98th pct by value99th pct by value +1.7 sd
Poverty rate6.42%100th pct96th pct -1.7 sd
Returns reporting capital gains41.9%94th pct by value100th pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.63494100+1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance uncertain7.9%9084-1.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain6,720 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.7%4668-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability28.2%7276-0.6CDC PLACES
Arthritis23.7%4260+0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.43168-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.1%42+1.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate030·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate026·2·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%5632+0.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.6464·52·-0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain24.6%1421+0.9Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort138———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.2%4411-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.3%4262-0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14%7881-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.2%8646+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people42.548·90·-0.4
Coronary heart disease5.9%2247+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.1%7073-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.2%2448+0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.2%5868+0.3CDC PLACES
Depression21.2%7280-0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.4%4476-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.49760·68·+0.3
Economy score0.89452·55·-0.1
Employed297———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents06·1·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health17.3%4873-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.310099-0.9County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.09%110-1.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.4%6380-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.6%8693-1.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.1%7280-0.6CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.471625+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$28,227k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.52·1·-2.4
Hearing disability7.6%2621+0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.8%1858+0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.3%2074+0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate87.4%98·99·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.2%6084-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units458———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7.7%6072-0.4CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,69941·38·-0.5
Jail population rate18933·14·-0.6
Labour force306———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.3%6678-0.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22%4370-0.1CDC PLACES
Loneliness30.1%8094-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents18.480·90·+0.9
Mammography in the past two years74.4%8658+0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.34741·56·-0.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$88,1909584+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain19.4 min4083+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age54.2 years86·98·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$71933·19·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$121,30030·22·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$62,500—48—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$56,6653031-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain4602·4·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0625-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.2%6878-0.5CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate062·35·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity23.2%5476-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity38.6%2046+0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units340———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents050·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units297———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return580———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·38·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move526———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$44,0349888+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$40,51505-1.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$27,510k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population679———BEA Regional Accounts
Population674———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over680———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over550———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over619———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over219———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain51———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain96———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined795———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined671———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago740———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain141———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census706———
Poverty rate uncertain6.42%10096-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain14.3%4043+0.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000442———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004432———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008411———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012437———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016430———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020427———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024389———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population84.8%85·81·+1.1
Private job growth-5.5618·4·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs34———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps8.2%29·13·-0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents27.122·7·-0.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200078.830·95·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20047939·93·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200873.741·87·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201280.439·92·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201689.470·97·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202089.670·98·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202491.478·99·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.691·63·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%58·5·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%32·1·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains41.9%94·100·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%72·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.3%48·16·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%3462-0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.5%66·93·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%87·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain5%3·0·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.1%74·95·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain22.4%49·11·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married64.4%74·98·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%85·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.8%86·91·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain8.24%56·77·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.8%4855-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.6%5080-0.1CDC PLACES
Stroke3%3858-0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%76·54·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed310———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken184———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.9%6981-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population795———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed9———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%5272-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate25.8%40·83·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units118———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.3%6072-0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain108———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute347———Census ACS 5-year

17of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.