placestats

Garfield County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population938
Density0.1people per km² of land
Median household income$61,750
Land area12,112km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Garfield County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Petroleum County, MT, Hoonah-Angoon Census Area, AK, King County, TX, McPherson County, NE, Blaine County, NE, Lincoln County, NV, Powder River County, MT, Bethel Census Area, AK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Garfield Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Returns reporting capital gains44.4%96th pct by value100th pct by value +1.6 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200491.9100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.6 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200091.497th pct by value100th pct by value +1.4 sd
Depression26.6%4th pct23rd pct +1.4 sd
High cholesterol27.5%94th pct98th pct -1.3 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201695.195th pct by value100th pct by value +1.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4162348-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.8%5857-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain4,775 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.6%113+0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.6%5869-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability29.5%4866-0.3CDC PLACES
Arthritis24.4%1249+0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.1957184+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.8%144+1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate036·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate036·2·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%2211+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents10.774·59·+0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain22.3%2829+0.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort214———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income214———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79%365-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.6%3254-0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.9%4056+0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.1%2411-0.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people59.774·98·+0.4
Coronary heart disease5.5%5868-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.5%2416+0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.5%5058-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.6%5254+0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.7315·5·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression26.6%423+1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.5%7891-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.32944·60·+0.3
Economy score0.54716·34·-0.7
Education score1.41—99·—
Effective property tax rate0.65639·33·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed661———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.944·32·-0.2
Fair or poor self-rated health17.9%4268-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.25094-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.21%435-0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.6%6178-0.6CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population0———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.5%1831+0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.6%3651-0.0CDC PLACES
Friending clustering0.14764·93·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4631232+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$62,466k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.44640·25·+0.1
Hearing disability7.4%4628-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.7%7688-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.5%9498-1.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate70.3%41·31·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.3%6182-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units746———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability8.4%3657-0.1CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,36630·25·-0.6
Jail population rate16427·11·-0.6
Labour force683———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8%4763-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.4%4765-0.4CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.0605—97—Stanford Education Data Archive
Loneliness31.7%4579-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.7458·53·-0.1
Mammography in the past two years73.2%7247+0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score0.19329·47·-0.0
Mean income of departing households$55,38149·59·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.2 min3587+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.9 years45·71·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$80247·40·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$178,30059·53·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,750—46—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$53,069821-1.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,16942·32·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.13%8593+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0705-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.5%5274-0.4CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99742·80·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate068·35·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity22.2%6683-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity30.7%8892-1.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units407———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents086·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents17.988·98·+0.6
Owner-occupied housing units286———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return1,120———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return282·92·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move992———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,2065658-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,8331633-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$60,597k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,216———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,211———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over746———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over917———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over666———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over259———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain113———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line202———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined926———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,195———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago845———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain142———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,173———
Poverty rate uncertain12.2%4760-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)16.9%1827+0.6Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000744———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004655———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008727———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012700———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016718———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020813———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024800———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population79.4%—74·—
Preventable hospital stays3,5421421+0.9County Health Rankings
Private job growth-4.0922·5·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs164———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04347998+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.4%40·23·-0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents48.362·52·-0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200091.497·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200491.9100·100·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.579·99·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201290.490·99·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201695.195·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202094.990·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202495.187·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20243.6637·30·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%66·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit7.41%52·5·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains44.4%96·100·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%66·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.2%32·5·-0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%4062-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over27.6%71·93·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%82·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain11%61·36·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race0%20·1·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.1%60·74·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married16.2%15·1·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married68.6%84·99·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%76·11·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic97.8%94·100·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.16%14·5·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain21.3%3949-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.5%7086-0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.27157·67·+0.2
Stroke3%4658-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication52.4%46·11·-0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed540———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,408———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.5%5370-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population938———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.0309—94—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed22———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%5459-0.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate45.4%90·98·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units339———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%5268-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50172———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute262———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.