placestats

Clark County, ID

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population776
Density0.2people per km² of land
Median household income$52,083
Land area4567km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Clark County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Carter County, MT, Sioux County, NE, Kusilvak Census Area, AK, Wheeler County, OR, Terrell County, TX, Harney County, OR, Mineral County, CO, Catron County, NM. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Clark Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Gini index of income inequality0.324100th pct100th pct -2.6 sd
Share aged 65 and over13.1%4th pct by value6th pct by value -2.0 sd
Adults under 65 without health insurance20%4th pct5th pct +2.0 sd
Per capita income$22,9176th pct6th pct -1.9 sd
Median age33.4 years4th pct by value5th pct by value -1.8 sd
Binge drinking14.6%96th pct90th pct -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5074788+0.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance20%45+2.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain8,610 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.4%4418-0.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over20%2024+0.6CDC PLACES
Any disability38.3%1015+1.3CDC PLACES
Arthritis23.4%5864-0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2992117-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking14.6%9690-1.7CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate032·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate034·2·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.3%8884-1.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents014·6·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain24.1%3023+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort266———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening77.1%101-1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.8%3649-0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability19.1%1019+1.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening50.4%225-0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people25.36·60·-1.3
Coronary heart disease6.3%3230+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%6051-0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.3%7072-0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year57.1%4041-0.1CDC PLACES
Depression21.7%6874-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.5%1436+0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-110·13·-0.9
Economy score0.07512·14·-1.1
Education score-1.58—2·—
Employed317———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents06·1·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health23.8%1624+0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.96796-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%8827+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity21.9%1119+0.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain164———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.1%6477-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.3%2222+0.6CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.324100100-2.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$61,141k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.42446·26·+0.1
Hearing disability9.5%82+1.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31%3866-0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.4%3883-0.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate uncertain63.9%14·13·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity17.2%1419+1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units442———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability9.9%2028+0.4CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,67346·36·-0.3
Jail population rate40654·48·-0.3
Labour force330———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation11.2%1620+0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23%3258+0.0CDC PLACES
Loneliness31.5%4681-0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents6.0850·48·-0.3
Mammography in the past two years67.4%209-0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score0.36865·57·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$49,945205-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain26.7 min432+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age uncertain33.4 years4·5·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77160·32·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$203,00071·62·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$52,083—21—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,6254828+0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain59210·8·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0665-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.5%1017+1.1CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate066·35·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity29%1433+0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity36.7%4463+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units uncertain252———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents22.988·98·+0.8
Owner-occupied housing units uncertain161———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return640———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return290·91·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move572———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$22,91766-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$52,5983044-0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$42,131k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population801———BEA Regional Accounts
Population801———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over585———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over612———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over474———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain102———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain98———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line122———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined771———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined797———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago669———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census790———
Poverty rate uncertain12.7%5156-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.3%5036-0.1Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000382———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004353———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008375———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012328———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016283———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020311———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024333———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%16·2·-1.6
Private job growth5.7875·89·+0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs183———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps15.2%78·66·+0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents2918·9·-0.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200083.275·98·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200486.887·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200882.783·98·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201278.153·89·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.249·86·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202086.668·94·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202484.860·89·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20241.6934·25·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%64·5·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%26·1·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.9%12·36·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%72·9·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.1%58·15·+0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.6%1420+0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain13.1%4·6·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%93·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain11.8%50·49·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain21.1%—96·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain30.7%81·90·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.2%18·29·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain32.6%83·73·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married47.9%24·25·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%85·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic59.3%20·22·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35%4070+0.1CDC PLACES
Stroke3.4%2230+0.2CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication52.3%30·11·-0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed310———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,373———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off10.5%1930+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population776———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.0482—1—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed13———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.9%2433+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate43%84·97·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units190———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7%1214+0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain145———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute uncertain322———Census ACS 5-year

22of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.