Orthodox Christian adherents
Members of Orthodox Christian churches, such as Greek, Russian and Antiochian Orthodox, as a share of the population.
How it has moved
Loading…
Every state, every year
One row per state and one column per year, sorted by the latest value. It shows states, not counties: nobody can scan 3,222 rows, and the pattern only shows when it all fits on one screen.
Loading…
Where it comes from
· Religion Census ORTHRATE (2010, 2020)
Greek, Russian, Antiochian and other Orthodox bodies. The six groups add up to the published total. Adherents are counted where the congregation is, not where the member lives, and a denomination that did not report is absent rather than zero.
Combining areas: an average weighted by population, decennial census.
What it goes with
The strongest links that have a page of their own. Unadjusted is the link before adjusting for anything, from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). Adjusted compares places with the same population density, income and education levels, so those differences can’t explain the link. This list leaves out the 8 pairs built from the same numbers or the same model as this measure, since they are bound to match.
| Measure | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2000Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2000 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2000 by US county | +0.52 | +0.35 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2004Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2004 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2004 by US county | +0.52 | +0.34 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2008Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2008 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2008 by US county | +0.52 | +0.34 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2012Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2012 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2012 by US county | +0.52 | +0.34 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2016Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2016 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2016 by US county | +0.51 | +0.33 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2020Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2020 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2020 by US county | +0.49 | +0.31 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Presidential votes cast, 2024Where Orthodox Christian adherents is higher, Presidential votes cast, 2024 tends to be higher: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Presidential votes cast, 2024 by US county | +0.50 | +0.31 |
Population makeup
How this measure varies with the racial and ethnic makeup of counties. Every group is shown, whatever its rank. These are links across counties: they describe places, not people. They say nothing about any person’s risk or behaviour based on their race. Counties with a larger share of one group also differ in much else, such as income, segregation, region and history. The adjusted figure only accounts for density, income and education.
| Share of residents | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Share White, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share White, not Hispanic by US county | -0.16 | -0.17 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Share Black, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share Black, not Hispanic by US county | +0.00 | +0.04 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Share Hispanic or Latino, any raceCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share Hispanic or Latino, any race by US county | +0.01 | +0.01 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Share Asian, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share Asian, not Hispanic by US county | +0.24 | +0.22 |
| Orthodox Christian adherents and Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic by US county | +0.25 | +0.25 |
Highest and lowest
Of 3,144 counties reporting it. These are the two ends of a national ranking. For most measures, that ranking mostly sorts places by income and how urban they are. That is why the place pages compare each place with similar places instead.
Highest
- Lake and Peninsula Borough, AK — 44.9
- Dillingham Census Area, AK — 24.4
- Bethel Census Area, AK — 19.4
- Kusilvak Census Area, AK — 11.8
- Aleutians East Borough, AK — 8.48
Lowest
The middle area reports 0. The middle half of counties falls between 0 and 0 (the 25th to 75th percentile).
All measures · Explore its pairs · How the US county data works