Returns reporting capital gains
The percentage of tax returns reporting a capital gain: profit from selling something like stock or property.
How it has moved
Loading…
Every state, every year
One row per state and one column per year, sorted by the latest value. It shows states, not counties: nobody can scan 3,222 rows, and the pattern only shows when it all fits on one screen.
Loading…
Where it comes from
IRS Statistics of Income · IRS SOI N01000 / N1
Filers who made a profit selling things like shares or property during the year. This goes with owning such assets, but also with choosing to sell them. The population is filers, not residents.
Combining areas: an average weighted by tax returns filed.
What it goes with
The strongest links that have a page of their own. Unadjusted is the link before adjusting for anything, from −1 (opposite) to +1 (in step). Adjusted compares places with the same population density, income and education levels, so those differences can’t explain the link. This list leaves out the 7 pairs built from the same numbers or the same model as this measure, since they are bound to match.
| Measure | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Returns reporting capital gains and Adult income rank of children raised poor hereWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Adult income rank of children raised poor here tends to be higher: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Adult income rank of children raised poor here by US county | +0.64 | +0.55 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share with a bachelor's degree or higherWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Share with a bachelor's degree or higher tends to be higher: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Share with a bachelor's degree or higher by US county | +0.63 | +0.55 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Social connection scoreWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Social connection score tends to be higher: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Social connection score by US county | +0.69 | +0.54 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Binge drinkingWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Binge drinking tends to be higher: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Binge drinking by US county | +0.62 | +0.54 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Lack of reliable transportationWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Lack of reliable transportation tends to be lower: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Lack of reliable transportation by US county | -0.71 | -0.53 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Fair or poor self-rated healthWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Fair or poor self-rated health tends to be lower: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Fair or poor self-rated health by US county | -0.76 | -0.53 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share aged 65 and overWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Share aged 65 and over tends to be higher: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Share aged 65 and over by US county | +0.34 | +0.53 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Housing insecurityWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Housing insecurity tends to be lower: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Housing insecurity by US county | -0.72 | -0.52 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Food insecurityWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Food insecurity tends to be lower: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Food insecurity by US county | -0.72 | -0.52 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Threat of utility shut-offWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Threat of utility shut-off tends to be lower: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Threat of utility shut-off by US county | -0.70 | -0.51 |
Population makeup
How this measure varies with the racial and ethnic makeup of counties. Every group is shown, whatever its rank. These are links across counties: they describe places, not people. They say nothing about any person’s risk or behaviour based on their race. Counties with a larger share of one group also differ in much else, such as income, segregation, region and history. The adjusted figure only accounts for density, income and education.
| Share of residents | Unadjusted | Adjusted |
|---|---|---|
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share White, not HispanicWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Share White, not Hispanic tends to be higher: a moderate link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Share White, not Hispanic by US county | +0.38 | +0.48 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share Black, not HispanicWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Share Black, not Hispanic tends to be lower: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Share Black, not Hispanic by US county | -0.42 | -0.31 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share Hispanic or Latino, any raceWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Share Hispanic or Latino, any race tends to be lower: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share Hispanic or Latino, any race by US county | -0.18 | -0.33 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share Asian, not HispanicCould easily be chance once only places with similar density, income and education are compared. Share Asian, not Hispanic by US county | +0.22 | -0.10 |
| Returns reporting capital gains and Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not HispanicWhere Returns reporting capital gains is higher, Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic tends to be lower: a weak link that holds when only places with similar density, income and education are compared, and inside states as well. Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic by US county | -0.18 | -0.25 |
Highest and lowest
Of 3,143 counties reporting it. These are the two ends of a national ranking. For most measures, that ranking mostly sorts places by income and how urban they are. That is why the place pages compare each place with similar places instead.
Highest
- Harding County, SD — 46.6%
- McPherson County, NE — 45%
- Garfield County, MT — 44.4%
- Carter County, MT — 44.1%
- Marin County, CA — 43.9%
Lowest
- Kenedy County, TX — 0%
- King County, TX — 0%
- Loving County, TX — 0%
- Kusilvak Census Area, AK — 0.722%
- Starr County, TX — 2.19%
The middle area reports 15.3%. The middle half of counties falls between 10.9% and 20.3% (the 25th to 75th percentile).
All measures · Explore its pairs · How the US county data works