placestats

Murray County, MN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8119
Density4.5people per km² of land
Median household income$74,475
Land area1825km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Murray County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Howard County, NE, Cedar County, NE, Sevier County, UT, Grant County, SD, Fremont County, IA, Grant County, MN, Clay County, NE, Pierce County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Murray Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership organisations36100th pct100th pct +3.2 sd
Life expectancy82.9 years100th pct99th pct +2.5 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.714%0th pct2nd pct +2.3 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation5.91%94th pct by value96th pct by value +2.1 sd
Social connection score1.81100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.0 sd
Unemployment rate4.2%8th pct24th pct +1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5315693+0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.9%5070-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work74,915 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.714%02+2.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over6.8%9698-1.7CDC PLACES
Any disability27.8%4679-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.5338·21·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20.7%9294-1.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3259195+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20%5820+0.0CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain44.26·18·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate6.6316·15·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments242———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.0428·15·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3632+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents26.684·89·+0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11%5285-0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.139%37·8·-0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,154———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,154———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.1%5436+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.3%8487-1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.6%4473-0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.8%9084+1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people28.162·67·+0.1
Coronary heart disease5.4%4273-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%3469+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.5%2458+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.3%4068-0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.068·9·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression26.1%1027+1.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.1%5483-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.70644·79·+0.3
Economic connectedness1.17893+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9477073+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.4568·81·+0.5
Effective property tax rate0.76522·45·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,077———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.440·30·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health16.8%4078-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter65982-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.37%4434-0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.6%3578+0.1CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population263———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.2%4276+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.7%5686-0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01466884-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12576·71·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4157083-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$656,700k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.68188·89·+1.2
Hearing disability6.5%7467-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.2%7891-0.8CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.4%7693-0.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate81.8%80·89·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.5%2779+0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units4,401———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate32918·4·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-9,36314·7·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.5%4077-0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain718486-1.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,23232·21·-0.6
Jail population rate22339·19·-0.4
Labour force4,257———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.7%2169+0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.5%1864+0.7CDC PLACES
Life expectancy82.9 years10099+2.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.4%2171+0.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents29.882·97·+0.9
Mammography in the past two years76.4%7475+0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.89660·87·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$81,4525476+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$51,23324·38·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$60,59778·72·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.8 min5874-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.6 years88·84·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$76846·30·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$179,40056·54·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$74,475—77—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$74,8018079+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,37312·43·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0642%3437-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations36100100+3.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.9%4882-0.4CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99568·60·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.41448·41·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.46964·62·+0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.4%4467-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity36.7%5463-0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,601———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents030·11·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,947———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,640———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·42·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,041———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$40,2778280+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$68,5716083+0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$554,530k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,087———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,049———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,686———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,312———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,804———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,108———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line647———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line836———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,999———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,962———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,405———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,388———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,179———
Poverty rate8.09%6289-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.5%2875+0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality24010098-1.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,753———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,998———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,813———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,767———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,668———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,896———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,769———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population39.1%28·19·-0.7
Preventable hospital stays1,4827892-0.9County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1074·1·-1.1
Private job growth0.88724·36·-0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,276———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02566682+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9%62·19·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents68.862·87·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200053.512·32·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200455.118·31·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200849.714·28·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201253.716·30·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201669.722·49·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202069.926·51·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202471.626·51·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202418.188·81·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.2%58·50·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.36%20·12·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.6%72·89·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation5.91%94·96·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71%20·14·-0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%3677-0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26%94·89·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain0.185%—45·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain1.11%—59·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain0.616%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.64%25·9·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born3.24%60·45·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.89%51·45·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.2%72·85·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23%38·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.3%72·94·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.49%40·25·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.6%46·72·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.06%63·53·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23.9%5659+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.7%5085-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.81100·99·+2.0
Stroke2.8%3876-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.5%36·23·+0.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,060———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,399———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.5%5387-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population8,119———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed180———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.2%824+1.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18.2%86·64·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units800———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4%5083-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,492———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain66———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,607———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,0929897-1.5County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.