placestats

Fremont County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6570
Density5.0people per km² of land
Median household income$73,750
Land area1324km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Fremont County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Jefferson County, OR, Sevier County, UT, Murray County, MN, Cedar County, NE, Howard County, NE, Grant County, SD, Richland County, ND, Grant County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Fremont Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Religious adherents31.58th pct by value14th pct by value -1.5 sd
Dental visit in the past year69.3%94th pct95th pct +1.3 sd
Membership organisations6.196th pct14th pct -1.3 sd
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%92nd pct by value46th pct by value +1.3 sd
Prison population rate67688th pct by value57th pct by value +1.1 sd
Private job growth-1.616th pct by value13th pct by value -1.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4672077-1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.1%9493-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work60,845 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.389%3521+0.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.8%3867+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability26.5%8488-0.8CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.1852·35·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.8%1858+1.0CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.5%185+1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.3
Business closing rate10.576·85·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments153———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.174·77·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2419+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents8.2522·50·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.9%2665+0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.128%22·6·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort962———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income962———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.3%5840+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.1%3068+0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.4%5076-0.2CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60.5%7675+0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people30.368·73·+0.4
Coronary heart disease5.4%4273-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%3869+0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.9%1852+0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year69.3%9495+1.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1458·33·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression21.9%6071-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%4478-0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.79674·84·+0.6
Economic connectedness0.995282+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7751741-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.3550·77·+0.2
Education score0.87480·91·+1.0
Effective property tax rate1.384·80·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,277———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents7.8812·15·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health16.9%4477-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.43053+0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.38%4237-0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.7%6187-0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain93———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.8%3666+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.1%4680-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02646277-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12164·64·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.434068-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$434,520k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.2744·70·-0.1
Hearing disability6.5%7267-0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%3270+0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.2%3675+0.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.8%72·85·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.7%7390-0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units3,130———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,12785·58·+1.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,55432·31·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.3%5882-0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain77.16178-0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,04173·50·+0.2
Jail population rate45180·55·+0.8
Labour force3,363———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.8%7388-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.6%2452+0.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain0.037183+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy76.3 years2062-0.7County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.248—53·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$972k———Census local government finances
Loneliness33.2%2161+0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents15.348·86·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years77.3%7682+0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.83860·84·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$85,2717481+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$52,18138·41·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$53,73542·54·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.5 min4269+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.4 years86·84·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$75332·27·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$147,50028·36·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$73,750—76—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$72,1295273+0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,91860·64·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0948%7276+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations6.19614-1.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.8%5684-0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99458·55·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.65652·45·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.037446·42·-0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.4%6075-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity40%1830+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,760———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents026·11·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,229———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,090———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return256·66·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,348———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$39,7617278+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$60,9803670-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$393,810k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,458———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,458———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,435———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,059———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,705———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,549———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain489———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain623———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,443———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,357———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,887———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher995———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,605———
Poverty rate uncertain7.59%8891-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.8%5081-0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4491858+0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,616———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,911———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,894———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,668———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,595———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,857———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,814———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population38.9%23·19·-0.8
Preventable hospital stays1,8276284-0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate67688·57·+1.1
Private job growth-1.616·13·-1.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,770———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02767486+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.9%64·27·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents31.58·14·-1.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200058.628·49·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20046134·49·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200851.824·33·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201254.622·32·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201671.438·54·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202071.636·55·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202472.634·54·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20241468·68·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.56%24·36·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.9%62·26·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains18.9%30·69·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.6%42·44·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%92·46·+1.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%5882-0.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.6%82·80·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.8%66·33·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.42%17·14·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.24%27·29·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.6%42·69·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%40·17·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married59.1%54·88·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.3%69·51·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.7%76·85·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.59%44·43·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.1%3048-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.7%5285-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.0022822·49·-0.9
Stroke2.8%3876-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.9%68·43·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,120———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken11,215———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.7%5884-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population6,570———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01546376+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed86———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.6%5283-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate11.8%44·36·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units370———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.8%7289-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,226———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,826———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain9,0072162+0.7County Health Rankings

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.