placestats

Cedar County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8344
Density4.3people per km² of land
Median household income$73,977
Land area1917km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Cedar County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Grant County, SD, Sevier County, UT, Howard County, NE, Murray County, MN, Grant County, MN, Richland County, ND, Fremont County, IA, Clay County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Cedar Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Catholic adherents58.4100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.7 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.61398th pct99th pct +2.0 sd
Depression17.4%98th pct98th pct -1.8 sd
Economic connectedness1.22100th pct100th pct +1.8 sd
Religious adherents9198th pct by value98th pct by value +1.7 sd
Frequent mental distress14.8%98th pct97th pct -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.6139899+2.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.1%8482-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work75,635 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.4%6078-0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability25.5%9292-1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.9324·11·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis20.9%8692-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1917283+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.8%164+1.0CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain63.529·68·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents090·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.2152·65·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments260———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened23———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.8348·41·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3632+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents58.4100·99·+3.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain9%8492-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.134%35·7·-0.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,659———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,659———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.6%3827-0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.3%8487-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.1%9897-1.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.1%2429-0.7CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people26.350·63·-0.1
Coronary heart disease5.1%9086-1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.1%9697-1.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking13.2%8483-1.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.7%6080+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.3920·14·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression17.4%9898-1.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.4%9493-0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.0798·93·+1.1
Economic connectedness1.22100100+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9055166+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.4266·79·+0.4
Effective property tax rate1.0450·66·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,479———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents6.9812·13·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health14%9896-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.34578-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.36%3830-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.4%9494-1.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain71———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress14.8%9897-1.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress10.5%9897-1.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02379696-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12878·76·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4157083-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$619,340k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.55674·84·+0.8
Hearing disability6.7%5257-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.3%7290-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.1%9699-1.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.7%42·76·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.6%9497-1.6CDC PLACES
Housing units3,904———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate35121·5·-0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,75184·84·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.4%9895-1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain78.66176-0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6775·7·-1.1
Jail population rate14520·8·-0.7
Labour force4,563———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6%9797-1.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.1%9494-1.3CDC PLACES
Life expectancy80.2 years9294+1.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness29.4%9197-1.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents25.564·95·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years78.8%8891+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score1.1694·96·+1.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$84,5587280+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$58,01262·59·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$46,26112·27·-1.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.3 min7283-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.9 years42·54·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$68312·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$175,50044·52·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$73,977—76—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,8954668-0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,82746·61·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.128%9292+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations14.35676-0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability9.8%9894-1.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99678·71·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-0.38436·26·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.4632·23·-0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity23.3%6675-0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity40.5%1226+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,419———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0756·20·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,692———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,100———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return288·92·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,397———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$37,7495071+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$72,1877087+0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$595,110k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,244———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,262———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,593———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,180———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,579———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,829———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line506———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line703———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,146———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,174———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,579———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,394———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,380———
Poverty rate6.21%9897-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)8.6%7889-0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2989493-1.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,269———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,536———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,174———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,334———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,420———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,996———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,912———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.5
Preventable hospital stays2,3924764-0.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate20728·6·-0.7
Private job growth3.7482·76·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,025———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02314675-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.2%24·7·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents9198·98·+1.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200073.866·89·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200475.866·88·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20087164·82·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201277.474·88·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201686.188·93·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202085.288·92·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202485.586·91·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.762·60·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.82%36·42·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit8.97%10·10·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.4%98·94·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.769%14·13·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.8%34·20·-0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.7%9693-1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.9%60·71·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.28%16·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain0.851%3·3·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.43%8·18·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.8%64·82·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%95·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.1%16·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married62.4%80·96·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic1.47%10·5·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain0.849%—9·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic95.3%100·97·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.25%90·77·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher25%6464+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30.1%8696-1.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.0474·95·+0.7
Stroke2.6%9490-1.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.2%98·65·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,900———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,211———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.9%9194-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population8,344———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed84———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.8%9098-1.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate12.4%52·38·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units485———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.6%9493-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,495———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain95———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,922———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,3459196-1.4County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.