placestats

Pierce County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7312
Density4.9people per km² of land
Median household income$75,938
Land area1485km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pierce County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Andrews County, TX, Turner County, SD, Moody County, SD, Gaines County, TX, Murray County, MN, Nemaha County, KS, Howard County, NE, Clay County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pierce Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Per capita personal income$121,910100th pct99th pct +4.3 sd
Education score1.51100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.4 sd
Net business formation rate-6.72nd pct by value2nd pct by value -2.0 sd
Economy score1.9196th pct by value91st pct by value +1.9 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents39.592nd pct by value83rd pct by value +1.8 sd
Business opening rate2.872nd pct by value2nd pct by value -1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5477295+0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.3%6679-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work69,920 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%8294-1.6County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.3%6684-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability25.1%9694-1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.7920·9·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.7%6086-0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3559697+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22.4%326+0.8CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain84.872·90·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.5766·72·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments202———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate2.872·2·-1.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%4832+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents17.764·77·+0.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain10.2%6689-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.147%48·11·-0.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,111———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,111———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%4231-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.5%6282-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.3%9096-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.5%3640-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people21.924·51·-0.6
Coronary heart disease5.2%7282-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%8494-1.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.3%6672-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.9%6681+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.9448·27·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression18.3%8296-1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.6%8690-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.0390·92·+1.0
Economic connectedness1.169698+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8313253-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.9196·91·+1.9
Education score1.51100·99·+2.4
Effective property tax rate1.1668·73·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,919———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents39.592·83·+1.8
Fair or poor self-rated health14.6%8894-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.25679-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.41%5449+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.8%8893-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.2%7895-1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.1%8693-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.01739095-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11756·56·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4077888-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$719,450k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.54768·84·+0.6
Hearing disability6.7%5057-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.8%6487-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.3%5084-0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.5%48·75·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.8%8896-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units3,137———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,76244·47·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.6%8893-1.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain728085-0.8County Health Rankings
Labour force3,999———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.2%8595-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.7%7388-0.8CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.04919394+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy79.4 years8090+0.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.5%7391-0.7CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents17.958·89·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years75.2%5465+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0990·94·+0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$83,3935479+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$60,76770·65·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$59,00666·69·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.3 min5271-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age39.7 years24·33·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$85064·50·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$182,70054·55·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$75,938—79—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$78,4548883+1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,11560·70·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.098%7678+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations156280+0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.1%8291-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99354·48·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-6.72·2·-2.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.156·9·-1.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.1%3061+0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity39.2%2639+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,859———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0130·14·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,245———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,890———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return280·88·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,339———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,4692059-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$121,91010099+4.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$890,400k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,304———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,299———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,789———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,430———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,947———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,435———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain573———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line664———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,188———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,217———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,604———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,134———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,317———
Poverty rate uncertain7.97%6290-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)9.2%6686-0.5Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3655079-0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,208———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,398———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,226———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,431———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,630———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,006———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,897———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,2425770-0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate34552·20·-0.2
Private job growth2.5456·63·+0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,574———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01953261-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.5%30·9·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents75.284·92·+1.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200081.696·97·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200483.892·98·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.386·90·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20128188·92·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201688.994·97·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202087.892·96·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202488.592·96·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.8332·40·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.56%72·57·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.5%24·12·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains26.1%84·92·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.89%14·18·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73%46·29·+0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.8%8090-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over19.6%32·49·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced7.27%4·2·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.48%10·19·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.3%54·77·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24%50·20·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married64.2%94·98·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.9%15·11·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.5%90·94·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed4.59%10·8·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.9%4656-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours29.7%9297-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.8368·91·+0.5
Stroke2.7%7084-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.6%84·55·+0.9CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,370———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,654———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.1%8592-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population7,312———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score0.03059794+1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed80———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2%7295-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain8.86%20·21·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain278———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.6%9493-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,391———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain118———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,277———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,4694580-0.2County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.