placestats

Howard County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6492
Density4.4people per km² of land
Median household income$74,508
Land area1474km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Howard County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Murray County, MN, Cedar County, NE, Sevier County, UT, Grant County, SD, Grant County, MN, Fremont County, IA, Clay County, NE, Pierce County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Howard Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50144100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.9 sd
Mean travel time to work28.3 min0th pct23rd pct +2.1 sd
Poverty rate5.44%100th pct98th pct -1.9 sd
Catholic adherents37.688th pct by value96th pct by value +1.6 sd
Years of potential life lost5,022100th pct97th pct -1.6 sd
Depression18.1%84th pct96th pct -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5225091+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.3%7479-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work83,635 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12%4673-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability25.3%9493-1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.8522·10·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22%5083-0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1325974+0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.3%42+1.3CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain144100·99·+3.9Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate7.8728·35·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments154———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.8458·58·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%2019+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents37.688·96·+1.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11.8%4082-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.157%54·14·-0.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,121———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,121———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.7%4429-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.5%6282-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.2%9696-1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.4%2831-0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people24.734·59·-0.3
Coronary heart disease5.1%9086-1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%8294-1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.3%6872-0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.7%6080+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.2612·12·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression18.1%8496-1.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.7%8289-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score1.0596·92·+1.1
Economic connectedness1.087092+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0924·65·-0.6
Education score0.75570·86·+0.7
Effective property tax rate1.1362·71·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,494———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents11.638·28·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health14.3%9695-0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.96784-0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.28%1811-1.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity10.9%8592-0.8CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain111———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.1%8896-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.2%8692-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01896282-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11346·48·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4087888-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$312,910k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.38656·77·+0.3
Hearing disability6.5%7267-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%2870+0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.3%8494-0.8CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.1%14·49·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity8.8%8896-1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units2,893———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-6,85018·12·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability6.6%9293-1.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain86.35366-0.1County Health Rankings
Labour force3,561———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.2%9195-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.5%8291-0.9CDC PLACES
Life expectancy79.7 years8691+0.9County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.8%5689-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents11.742·77·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years75.3%6266+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0990·94·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$73,3922463-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$50,21920·34·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$57,06964·64·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work28.3 min023+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age42.3 years56·58·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$81166·42·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$205,20072·63·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$74,508—77—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$68,7953666-0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,31480·74·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.112%8886+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations9.212436-0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.2%8490-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99348·43·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.9770·70·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.4134·25·-0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.4%3059+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity38.7%3845+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,494———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0248·17·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units1,847———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,150———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return258·75·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,614———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,0451657-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$61,8364472-0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$405,890k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,564———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,527———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,161———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,978———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,458———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,440———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain348———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line644———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,393———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,376———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,038———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,024———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,475———
Poverty rate uncertain5.44%10098-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain10.1%3878-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2909894-1.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,827———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,979———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,996———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,870———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,994———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,501———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,550———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays1,6506589-0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1062·1·-1.1
Private job growth-2.054·10·-1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,005———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0234475-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.6%35·10·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents60.950·77·+0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200064.836·70·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200469.248·74·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20086342·63·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201267.444·64·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.864·82·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.168·83·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.768·80·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.982·77·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.26%18·29·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit9.68%30·13·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.8%72·90·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.94%60·54·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.5%74·33·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.7%9693-1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.2%66·73·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%5·14·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.46%39·15·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.71%18·20·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.99%22·26·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93%96·95·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%95·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.1%18·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.1%66·94·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91.8%72·80·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.35%96·79·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23%4456-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30.7%7695-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.59246·84·+0.0
Stroke2.7%6884-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.3%74·50·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,100———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken11,930———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.1%7992-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population6,492———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.01656778+0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed67———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.9%8297-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain13.8%62·45·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain399———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.7%8091-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,191———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain172———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,953———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,02210097-1.6County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.