placestats

Power County, ID

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8018
Density2.2people per km² of land
Median household income$59,760
Land area3636km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Power County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Crane County, TX, Furnas County, NE, Phillips County, CO, Phillips County, KS, Greenwood County, KS, Hardeman County, TX, Rooks County, KS, Baker County, OR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Power Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Other religion adherents35.698th pct by value99th pct by value +4.8 sd
Hearing disability9.3%0th pct2nd pct +3.4 sd
Cholesterol screening77.4%0th pct2nd pct -3.2 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation6.29%98th pct by value97th pct by value +2.9 sd
People per tax return296th pct by value99th pct by value +2.5 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.355100th pct100th pct -2.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4552272-0.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance17.5%169+0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work52,830 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over23.4%412+2.0CDC PLACES
Any disability36.4%1423+1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.3760·39·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.8%4658+0.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2221025-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking14.9%10088-1.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents092·45·-0.2
Business closing rate14.796·98·+2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments153———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed23———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.978·74·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.6%8475-0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2980·91·+0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.2%7664-0.6Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,354———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,354———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening77.4%02-3.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.9%3246+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.2%1427+0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening51.3%168-1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people21.614·50·-1.1
Coronary heart disease6.1%3038+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%3651+0.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.3%9272-1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year58.1%3645-0.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.2250·36·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression21.8%6872-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.6%3252+0.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.71414·21·-1.3
Economic connectedness0.64016-2.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8144950-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.53314·33·-0.7
Education score-0.32533·24·-0.3
Effective property tax rate0.82532·50·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,536———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents4.332·6·-1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health21.8%2436+0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.44276-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.43%8456+0.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity19.2%628+1.6CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain1,026———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.3%7474-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.9%2428+1.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.13109+2.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11842·58·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.355100100-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$675,820k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.17274·64·+0.8
Hearing disability9.3%02+3.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.4%6471-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.6%5881-0.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.86%—29—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.6%28·51·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.3%628+1.7CDC PLACES
Housing units2,960———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.03—30—Opportunity Atlas
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-67130·35·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.4%2636+0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain86.97265-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate78813·9·-1.1
Jail population rate26333·26·-0.7
Labour force4,703———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.3%1228+1.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.7%4174-0.2CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.01948145+0.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.9 years7678+0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.4%8892-1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents8.0330·61·-0.7
Mammography in the past two years64.3%23-2.0CDC PLACES
Material security score0.68686·76·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,5962929-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$50,64050·36·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$51,31158·46·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work16 min7893-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age33.9 years2·6·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$72941·22·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$191,20078·59·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,760—40—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$68,4039465+1.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,57756·52·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0691%2044-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations3.7246-1.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.4%2027+1.1CDC PLACES
Mobility score0.0256—58·—
Mutual-friend share0.99532·58·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-3.8516·5·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.14858·48·+0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.4%3842+0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity38%5051+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,708———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents35.698·99·+4.8
Owner-occupied housing units2,019———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,760———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return296·99·+2.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,777———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$25,083210-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,5352448-0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$444,390k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,301———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,253———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,023———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,792———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,008———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,255———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain646———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,013———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,946———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,169———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,183———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain835———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,878———
Poverty rate uncertain8.13%9489-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain12.4%5459-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3538682-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,709———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,958———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,842———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,903———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,758———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,074———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,021———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population58.3%45·42·-0.1
Preventable hospital stays1,9348081-0.9County Health Rankings
Private job growth8.9588·96·+0.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,215———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02282874-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.4%71·54·+0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents7776·93·+0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200071.350·85·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200471.752·81·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200863.130·63·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201265.626·59·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201670.416·51·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207116·54·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.218·56·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20241.966·25·-1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.14%66·49·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.4%80·61·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains13.1%16·38·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation6.29%98·97·+2.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.1%24·15·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.3%2028+0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over15.7%6·16·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.28%18·14·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain12.8%81·90·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race33.8%86·91·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.6%64·69·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.4%64·23·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.6%88·95·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.37%39·53·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic60.9%14·24·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain4.65%2·9·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain16.7%1623-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.4%5674-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.14212·40·-1.3
Stroke3.3%2835+0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication51.4%10·7·-2.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,500———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,918———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.7%2438+0.7CDC PLACES
Total population8,018———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01564324-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed167———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%2243+0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain8.51%2·20·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain252———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.4%1221+0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,603———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,310———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain6,9328585-0.9County Health Rankings

19of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.