placestats

Phillips County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4874
Density2.1people per km² of land
Median household income$61,235
Land area2294km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Phillips County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Rooks County, KS, Hardeman County, TX, Sherman County, NE, Day County, SD, Crane County, TX, Power County, ID, Furnas County, NE, Washington County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Phillips Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents32.590th pct by value97th pct by value +1.6 sd
Learning rate-0.09174th pct1st pct -1.5 sd
Membership organisations2790th pct98th pct +1.5 sd
Social connection score1.5590th pct by value98th pct by value +1.4 sd
Business closing rate12.590th pct by value95th pct by value +1.4 sd
Effective property tax rate1.788th pct by value93rd pct by value +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5267092+0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.6%6659-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work40,330 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.5%176+0.8County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.6%5662-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability31%4856-0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0756·33·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25%1442+0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2077985+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.5%7451-0.7CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain99.6—96·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents092·45·-0.2
Business closing rate12.590·95·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments196———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed25———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.544·35·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%5444+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents13.654·68·-0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.8%8471-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.161%29·15·-0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort735———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income735———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.3%4423-0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7%2443+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.3%4250+0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.6%3625-0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people56.284·97·+0.9
Coronary heart disease5.9%4247+0.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%4460-0.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.2%2036+0.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.1%5856+0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.2218·11·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression22.5%5064-0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.9%5266-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.19542·54·+0.1
Economic connectedness1.037687+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7873544-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.93558·57·+0.3
Education score-0.9219·7·-1.0
Effective property tax rate1.788·93·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,312———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents33.880·76·+0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health18.3%5464-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.14881-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.38%7237+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.9%4965-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.2%3857+0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13%4663-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.02218496-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12560·71·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4355863-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$658,150k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.1348·43·-0.0
Hearing disability7.3%3431-0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.6%3660+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.8%3455+0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.9%30·53·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.9%3962-0.0CDC PLACES
Housing units2,797———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate52112·14·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$9,94674·79·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.5%4054-0.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain82.87871-1.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,54535·32·-0.4
Jail population rate17416·12·-0.9
Labour force2,369———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.7%3969-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.7%3674-0.2CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.091741-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.8 years4856+0.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.025—24·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$74k———Census local government finances
Loneliness31%6488-0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents32.590·97·+1.6
Mammography in the past two years70.3%2623-0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.53763·67·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,6012529-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$55,55962·52·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,61328·26·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.9 min6085-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.6 years56·76·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$62114·7·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$94,70018·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,235—44—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$59,4536040-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,60766·53·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.129%8492+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations279098+1.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.9%3453-0.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99882·88·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-410·5·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.84984·73·+0.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.3%3443+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity40.9%1422+1.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,182———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents5.880·88·+0.3
Owner-occupied housing units1,635———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,580———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·38·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,240———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,8874856+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$72,5438487+0.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$345,450k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,762———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,761———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,959———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,695———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,413———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,200———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain661———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line474———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,775———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,693———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,388———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher762———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,981———
Poverty rate uncertain13.8%3348+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.1%9678-1.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4236064-0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,792———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,847———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,667———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,565———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,664———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,781———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,747———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population40%26·20·-0.8
Preventable hospital stays3,864814+1.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate34724·20·-0.3
Private job growth-2.3718·9·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,321———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03317493+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.6%30·17·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents85.686·97·+1.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200077.184·93·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200480.286·94·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20088090·96·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201284.890·96·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201688.294·96·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202088.494·97·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202487.790·95·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.654·55·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.45%58·34·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.1%40·34·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains28.2%94·95·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%46·9·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.9%74·36·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.5%4457-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.6%62·85·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.7%84·87·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.28%21·30·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90%66·74·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.2%46·15·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.6%22·52·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.36%16·21·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.6%84·85·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.55%84·92·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.3%5053+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.8%2856+0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.5590·98·+1.4
Stroke3%4858-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.7%94·73·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,450———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,898———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.1%3347+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population4,874———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.034535-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed57———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.4%7089-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate22%65·76·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units615———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.5%5664-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50833———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain83———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,129———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain9,2885858-0.3County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.