placestats

Greenwood County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5956
Density2.0people per km² of land
Median household income$58,276
Land area2961km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Greenwood County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Baker County, OR, Franklin County, NE, Power County, ID, Crane County, TX, Lynn County, TX, Reeves County, TX, Yuma County, CO, Dewey County, OK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Greenwood Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share in the same house a year ago94.2%100th pct by value98th pct by value +2.4 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%98th pct71st pct +1.9 sd
Friending bias-0.052494th pct99th pct -1.6 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.66th pct by value1st pct by value -1.6 sd
Fine particulate matter8.56th pct24th pct +1.4 sd
Jail population rate86289th pct by value87th pct by value +1.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4773881-0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.9%6856-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work63,295 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.3%4850-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability32%5248-0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.5138·21·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25%2442+0.7CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2388489+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.4%4436-0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.4
Business closing rate9.5658·72·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments135———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.0940·29·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%3844+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.7412·31·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.9%3235+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.182%28·25·-0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,010———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,010———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.2%5022+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.3%2037+0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.8%5444+0.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening50.3%165-1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people48.270·94·+0.6
Coronary heart disease6.2%3034+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%4456+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.1%1827+0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.1%5051+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.1188·81·+1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression23.1%4058+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%4859-0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.051856·48·+0.3
Economic connectedness0.9315674+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7863543-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.70554·43·+0.2
Education score-0.32448·24·-0.1
Effective property tax rate1.6578·92·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,691———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents24.764·61·+0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health19.1%5457-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.5624+1.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.47%9871+1.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.6%4659-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.9%3043+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13%6463-0.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.05249499-1.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13274·82·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4791419+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$223,680k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.11766·44·+0.3
Hearing disability7.5%3424-0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.7%3651+0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32%3052+0.7CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate79.5%74·79·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.4%3956+0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units3,682———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,95488·89·+0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,12928·33·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.7%5250-0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1183023+0.5County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,81043·42·-0.3
Jail population rate86289·87·+1.3
Labour force2,782———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.1%4961-0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.4%6180-0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.076783-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.5 years2632-0.7County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.7%4279-0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents1556·85·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years71%4628+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.036235·38·-0.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$62,2054431-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$43,58434·14·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,71336·22·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work24 min2052+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age48.4 years74·90·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$71039·18·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$82,60016·3·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$58,276—35—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$59,1797239+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,36042·42·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.114%6687+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations16.86087+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.2%5050-0.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99768·82·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.4734·15·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.66·1·-1.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.1%4845-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity40.7%2024+0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,604———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.0348·18·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units2,070———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,100———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·32·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,499———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,7927461+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,9504049-0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$318,790k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,909———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,870———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,925———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,610———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,340———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,550———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line873———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line828———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,872———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,790———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,613———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher824———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,016———
Poverty rate14.9%3841+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.3%4043-0.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5324038+0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,561———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,244———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,279———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,123———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,840———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,077———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,884———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population76.7%70·68·+0.6
Preventable hospital stays3,4201424+0.8County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,12178·86·+0.1
Private job growth1.6264·49·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,002———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03428894+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.3%30·22·-0.7CDC PLACES
Religious adherents43.522·40·-0.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20007034·82·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200471.538·80·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200872.256·84·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201276.960·87·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201681.750·84·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.140·83·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248134·78·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20241154·57·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.82%32·18·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.3%56·49·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains18.9%38·69·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.45%68·38·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73%58·29·+0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%5448-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26%60·90·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain1.06%—73·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.9%82·90·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.95%28·38·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.2%100·98·+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.2%28·11·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54%44·60·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain79.5%—94·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.07%27·43·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91.2%74·78·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.93%76·86·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19%2935-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.4%3659+0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.86762·92·+0.4
Stroke3.1%5450-0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.4%86·69·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,750———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,799———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.6%3039+0.5CDC PLACES
Total population5,956———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed91———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.3%3655+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate29.3%82·89·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,078———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.7%6458-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,073———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,632———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain10,7643941+0.1County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.