placestats

Andrews County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population18,518
Density4.8people per km² of land
Median household income$76,902
Land area3887km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Andrews County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Moody County, SD, Pierce County, NE, Nemaha County, KS, Stanton County, NE, Gaines County, TX, Clay County, NE, Kearney County, NE, Box Elder County, UT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Andrews Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Adults under 65 without health insurance26.1%4th pct2nd pct +3.4 sd
Median gross rent$1,36498th pct by value91st pct by value +3.2 sd
Diagnosed diabetes12.9%4th pct20th pct +3.0 sd
Vision disability7.1%4th pct13th pct +3.0 sd
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race56.8%96th pct by value95th pct by value +3.0 sd
Share White, not Hispanic39.5%6th pct by value9th pct by value -2.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5436694+0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance26.1%42+3.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work184,040 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.158%7590-0.7County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.9%1246+1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability34.5%633+2.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.5268·42·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.2%7890-0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.294717-1.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.6%8849-1.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.4
Black-white residential segregation78.2—96·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate9.1150·63·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments416———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed37———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened57———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate1496·95·+1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.8%9293-2.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents14.856·71·-0.2
Child mortality uncertain55.4—56—County Health Rankings
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.2%2874+0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.212%89·42·+1.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,505———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,505———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.5%7443+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.2%1665+0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.4%636+1.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.5%1213-1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people14.510·28·-1.4
Coronary heart disease5.9%447+1.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.5%7691-0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.4%6271-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year49.8%414-2.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.8576·55·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression21.8%5472-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.9%420+3.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.4066·30·-2.4
Economic connectedness0.8431458-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.139491+1.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.4456·80·+0.3
Education score-0.00013124·43·-0.9
Effective property tax rate1.3390·81·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed9,206———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents42.896·87·+2.0
Fair or poor self-rated health25.6%615+2.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.53774-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.2%24-2.1County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population2,689———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.9%2263+0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.7%631+2.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.15803+2.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.10828·35·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4561239+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$5,201,800k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.3716·29·-2.1
Hearing disability7%1244+0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.6%251+2.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.6%642+1.9CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.94%7584+0.6County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate76.3%26·61·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing units7,063———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0282—36—Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,03979·52·+0.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-4,73620·17·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.2%640+2.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths73.58283-0.8County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,14069·53·+0.2
Jail population rate28049·28·-0.3
Labour force9,484———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy74.6 years1043-1.3County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents5.0930·39·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years71.6%2433-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.3896·58·-1.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$94,5159290+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$60,56966·65·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$65,30586·79·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.8 min5068-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median age33.1 years8·5·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,36498·91·+3.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$188,20054·57·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$76,902—80—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$80,9368886+1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,50086·79·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0399%410-1.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.091619-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.3%627+2.6CDC PLACES
Mobility score0.788—93·—
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain26.62921+0.3County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99898·90·+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.9396·93·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.33240·27·-0.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity31.5%619+2.4CDC PLACES
Obesity36.6%6064-0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units6,780———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents2.7574·68·-0.2
Owner-occupied housing units5,173———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return17,190———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return296·100·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move14,762———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,9354067-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$57,9962663-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$1,085,800k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population18,722———BEA Regional Accounts
Population18,664———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over13,756———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over12,871———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over11,099———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,790———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain2,613———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,110———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined18,380———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined18,509———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago16,265———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,214———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census18,610———
Poverty rate uncertain14.2%245+2.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.4%1867+0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality517842+1.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,024———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,536———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,629———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,482———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,943———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,863———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,060———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population90%90·87·+1.1
Preventable hospital stays3,6841217+1.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate79092·68·+1.6
Private job growth0.58722·33·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs6,172———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0107129-1.5Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents65.470·84·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200077.988·94·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20048592·99·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200882.896·98·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201282.190·94·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.472·86·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202085.390·92·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248790·94·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.0846·48·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.67%72·58·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.5%86·51·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.7%6·18·-2.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.05%22·23·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.3%28·16·-0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.5%223+2.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over9.67%2·1·-2.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain1.87%—33·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.72%8·4·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born14.5%92·92·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race56.8%96·95·+3.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.8%30·46·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%95·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26%78·35·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married62.3%68·96·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic39.5%6·9·-2.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain3.97%0·4·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.9%2240-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.6%839+1.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.4286·24·-1.4
Stroke3.2%642+2.0CDC PLACES
Suicide rate uncertain15.6—66—County Health Rankings
Taking blood pressure medication57.1%54·30·+0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed7,630———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken26,060———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population18,518———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.01942018-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed278———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%3072+0.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain4.01%0·2·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain283———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability7.1%413+3.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 504,383———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute8,453———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,2272159+0.6County Health Rankings

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.