placestats

Luce County, MI

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6325
Density2.7people per km² of land
Median household income$54,338
Land area2329km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Luce County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Rio Arriba County, NM, Russell County, KS, Washington County, ID, Republic County, KS, Harper County, KS, Knox County, MO, Siskiyou County, CA, Haskell County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Luce Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Unemployment rate6.8%2nd pct3rd pct +2.4 sd
Vacancy rate41.1%100th pct by value97th pct by value +2.3 sd
Per capita personal income$36,4344th pct1st pct -1.8 sd
Routine checkup in the past year77.5%98th pct by value77th pct by value +1.7 sd
Cholesterol screening83.6%98th pct64th pct +1.6 sd
Share in the same house a year ago81.7%8th pct by value6th pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.3971033-1.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.4%8677-1.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work28,710 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.5%176+0.6County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.4%6050-0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability33.8%6037-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.6832·24·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.2%1827+1.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2243725-0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.2%4039+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents080·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.0328·38·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments139———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate10.966·74·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%1832+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents14.456·70·-0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain26.9%2616+0.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.198%21·33·-0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort859———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income859———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.6%9864+1.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.2%2221+0.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.6%8446-0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59%9463+1.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people3048·72·-0.2
Coronary heart disease6.7%2416+0.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.3%2221+0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.6%2623+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.2%9268+1.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.3216·13·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression25.5%2833+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.6%4635-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.17772·38·+0.5
Economic connectedness0.7545438-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6261218-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.08364·8·-1.5
Effective property tax rate1.0241·64·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,946———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.940·32·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health21.4%6839-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.19295-1.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.2%124-1.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity19.2%3328+0.0CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain74———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.3%3835+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.5%6035-0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03896070-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.15290·95·+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4289070-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$203,230k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.38352·28·+0.1
Hearing disability7.5%4824-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure36.5%624+1.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31%6066-0.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate78.7%74·75·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity15.2%3628+0.0CDC PLACES
Housing units4,081———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-98632·34·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.4%6036-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1133528+0.0County Health Rankings
Labour force2,087———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation10.5%3926-0.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support26.6%1821+0.9CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.3 years8862+0.9County Health Rankings
Loneliness33.9%4651+0.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.264·72·+0.1
Mammography in the past two years73.1%8446+1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.30541·25·-0.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$54,2471811-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$43,51422·14·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,50030·21·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.6 min8694-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.6 years66·76·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$79958·39·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$110,40042·15·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$54,338—26—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$51,6644018-0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,12128·30·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.133%8893+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.88292+1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.8%7642-0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99998·97·+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.9280·81·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.35668·57·+0.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26%8054-0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity41.3%1419+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,404———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents2.3858·62·-0.1
Owner-occupied housing units1,891———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,450———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return26·14·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,935———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$27,6312219-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$36,43441-1.8BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$232,780k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,389———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,435———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,453———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,396———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,867———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,463———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line912———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,053———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,291———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,213———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,165———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher940———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,339———
Poverty rate17.2%3728+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)20.2%2213+0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4568456-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,536———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,829———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,740———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,596———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,579———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,001———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,985———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,4354863-0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate37224·22·-0.4
Private job growth7.6592·94·+1.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs999———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02124868-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps18.8%64·82·+0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents39.918·32·-0.7
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200060.834·57·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200462.632·54·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200855.626·42·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201261.528·49·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201672.136·55·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202071.532·55·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.836·57·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.158·65·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0.8%8·6·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.8%42·59·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.8%36·36·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4%84·85·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77.5%98·77·+1.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.1%6234-0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.1%64·78·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic6.88%68·90·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic8.21%88·64·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced16.6%96·97·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.17%13·8·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.82%6·8·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago81.7%8·6·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married30.2%64·62·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married46.6%30·20·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain5.61%81·90·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.58%33·44·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic77%54·44·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.58%20·43·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.3%4937-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37%5455-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.40470·75·+0.5
Stroke3.5%3425+0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%84·70·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,500———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,091———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.8%3021+0.3CDC PLACES
Total population6,325———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed141———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate6.8%23+2.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate41.1%100·97·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,677———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.5%6237-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50913———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,840———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,2799671-0.9County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.