placestats

Russell County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6717
Density2.9people per km² of land
Median household income$53,902
Land area2295km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Russell County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Washington County, ID, Knox County, MO, Luce County, MI, Rio Arriba County, NM, Republic County, KS, Roosevelt County, NM, Liberty County, FL, Siskiyou County, CA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Russell Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents37.2100th pct by value99th pct by value +3.9 sd
Preventable hospital stays5,6320th pct2nd pct +3.3 sd
Membership organisations22.694th pct96th pct +1.7 sd
Returns reporting capital gains24.4%96th pct by value89th pct by value +1.6 sd
Social connection score1.0388th pct by value94th pct by value +1.5 sd
Effective property tax rate1.7594th pct by value94th pct by value +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4958885+1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.2%7652-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work46,965 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.385%4122+0.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.7%9068-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability32.9%7643-0.7CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.4924·20·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.3%3438+0.6CDC PLACES
Binge drinking17.1%6658-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents078·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.2630·43·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments232———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed19———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened23———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate1052·61·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%4253+0.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents15.258·72·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain18%8249-1.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.207%35·38·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort981———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income981———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%5020+0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.4%3836-0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability17.2%7238-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.2%8638+0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.470·84·+0.5
Coronary heart disease6.1%7438-0.7CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.7%4047+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18.1%3027+0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.5%9469+1.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying528·29·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression22.7%6462-0.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%8059-0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.058182·43·+0.8
Economic connectedness0.9398275+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.744335-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.61176·38·+0.6
Education score-0.2546·28·-0.1
Effective property tax rate1.7594·94·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,009———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents4.772·7·-1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health19.6%8452-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.55174-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%4815-0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.7%8158-0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.1%4239+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.4%8655-1.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.05314859-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12862·77·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4386659-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$394,380k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.51630·22·-0.5
Hearing disability7.5%5424-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.7%7051-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.6%4442+0.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%7775+0.8County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate76.4%60·62·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.7%6952-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units3,687———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate97638·47·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$4,09264·58·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9%8444-0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1093632+0.0County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,15092·80·+1.3
Jail population rate61768·73·-0.1
Labour force3,092———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.3%7857-0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.2%6668-0.7CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.056379-1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy74.8 years6045+0.3County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.000277—2·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$1k———Census local government finances
Loneliness31.7%7579-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents37.2100·99·+3.9
Mammography in the past two years70.6%5626+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.27384·51·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$58,3003420-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,81636·24·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,72416·15·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.1 min9095-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.3 years72·79·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$72237·20·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$106,40036·13·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,902—24—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$55,4156627+0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,86384·62·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0864%4467-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations22.69496+1.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.8%7642-0.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99640·67·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.7466·66·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.51134·22·-0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity28.3%5837-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity41.8%816+1.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,099———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents1.1842·36·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units2,369———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,750———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return228·37·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,281———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,2557442+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$61,0388670+1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$407,920k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,683———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,723———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,536———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,253———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,802———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,733———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,004———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line868———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,541———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,626———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,969———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher868———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,691———
Poverty rate uncertain15.3%5438-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13.1%8853-1.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5066644-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,482———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,525———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,293———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,200———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,193———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,467———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,301———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population75%62·65·+0.5
Preventable hospital stays5,63202+3.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate36020·21·-0.5
Private job growth5.1588·86·+0.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,898———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02858487+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.3%16·22·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents58.464·73·+0.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200073.374·88·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200476.770·89·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877.386·93·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201281.282·93·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.884·91·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202082.368·86·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.252·78·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20247.9232·44·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.92%72·44·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.9%24·47·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.4%96·89·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%16·9·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.9%72·36·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.8%7844-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.8%80·89·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%0·5·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced15%88·90·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.03%25·38·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.9%66·60·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%92·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.2%34·37·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married48.7%40·28·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic4.9%76·85·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90%84·73·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed10.1%88·95·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.1%3630-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.1%9277-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.0388·94·+1.5
Stroke3.2%7242-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.1%94·77·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,080———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,673———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.8%6637-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population6,717———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02521011-1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed83———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%8079-0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain15.9%16·55·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain588———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%8054-1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,217———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,119———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,3406146-0.4County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.