placestats

Harper County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5446
Density2.6people per km² of land
Median household income$55,417
Land area2075km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Harper County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Siskiyou County, CA, Luce County, MI, Pawnee County, NE, Rio Arriba County, NM, Dawes County, NE, Hill County, MT, Clinch County, GA, Morris County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Harper Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.035898th pct95th pct +1.8 sd
Social connection score1.1996th pct by value96th pct by value +1.6 sd
Membership organisations22.592nd pct96th pct +1.5 sd
Membership of volunteering groups0.146%90th pct95th pct +1.4 sd
Effective property tax rate1.7896th pct by value95th pct by value +1.4 sd
Mean travel time to work14.6 min92nd pct96th pct -1.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4535671+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12%4635-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work30,085 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over19.5%2626+0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability35%4231+0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.9946·31·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.1%2028+1.0CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1188372+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.3%6454-0.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain125—99·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.3
Business closing rate6.4312·13·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments172———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.628·21·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%5053+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.0110·28·-1.0
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.5%7041-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.205%32·38·-0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort866———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income866———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.5%167-1.0CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.3%1419+1.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.1%3628+0.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.8%4614-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people49.286·95·+1.3
Coronary heart disease6.6%2219+0.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.5%4456-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.9%1014+1.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year52.1%3421-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.2714·12·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Depression23.2%5257-0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.4%4438-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.4744·29·-0.2
Economic connectedness0.9267874+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8227051+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.59864·37·+0.4
Education score-0.64728·13·-0.7
Effective property tax rate1.7896·95·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,456———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents32.570·75·+0.3
Fair or poor self-rated health22.3%4833-0.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.11637+0.9County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%7027+0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity17.9%4434+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19%4840+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.3%6438-0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01897882-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1358·79·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.447058-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$382,690k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.31558·32·+0.1
Hearing disability8%2413+0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.5%4042+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33%2437+0.8CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate73.6%38·46·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity14.3%4436+0.0CDC PLACES
Housing units3,026———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,10848·57·-0.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,12856·49·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.9%4028+0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1153125+0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,33279·74·+0.7
Jail population rate60168·72·-0.0
Labour force2,529———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.5%5637-0.2CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.6%5063-0.3CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0573169-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy74.8 years6445+0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.5%4770-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents15.176·85·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years71.8%6034+0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score0.068965·40·+0.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,4394828-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,24120·11·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$40,1136·8·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work14.6 min9296-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age40.8 years34·43·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$69338·15·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$77,30012·2·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$55,417—28—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,4235224+0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,37952·43·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.146%9095+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations22.59296+1.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.2%4028+0.2CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain36.6226+0.8County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99766·83·+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.1756·56·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.72376·70·+0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.8%2823+0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity42.1%814+1.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,205———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0230·17·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units1,622———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,700———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return256·62·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,147———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$28,5552822-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$65,0558678+1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$350,780k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,392———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,435———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,328———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,018———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,678———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,201———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line812———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line756———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,315———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,362———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,780———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher797———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,485———
Poverty rate15.3%5138-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.1%7045-0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5166042-0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,055———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,930———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,796———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,389———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,578———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,678———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,555———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population47.4%26·28·-0.6
Preventable hospital stays2,6164656+0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate50641·39·-0.3
Private job growth3.2580·71·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,685———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03589895+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.9%38·44·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents50.748·58·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200070.562·84·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200474.866·86·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200873.174·86·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201276.272·85·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201683.574·88·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202082.578·87·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.662·83·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202412.154·61·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.72%80·59·+1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.8%52·63·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.4%66·71·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%22·9·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.3%62·31·+0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.3%3828+0.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.1%40·72·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.1%64·82·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race7.73%49·62·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87.8%44·45·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.2%46·38·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married51.3%42·43·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.58%49·60·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic87%66·64·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.41%60·80·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.7%7151+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.8%5256-0.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.1996·96·+1.6
Stroke3.4%4230+0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.3%98·79·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,420———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,584———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.1%2926+0.3CDC PLACES
Total population5,446———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02938-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed73———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%7472-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate27.1%64·86·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units821———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.6%5435-0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,020———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain128———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,063———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain9,2288759-0.7County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.