placestats

Republic County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4662
Density2.5people per km² of land
Median household income$53,611
Land area1858km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Republic County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Rio Arriba County, NM, Haskell County, TX, Luce County, MI, Dawes County, NE, Washington County, ID, Knox County, MO, Coleman County, TX, Russell County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Republic Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents34.898th pct by value98th pct by value +3.4 sd
Membership organisations32.3100th pct99th pct +3.2 sd
Social connection score1.85100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.8 sd
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.2%100th pct88th pct -1.9 sd
Returns reporting capital gains25.2%98th pct by value90th pct by value +1.7 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.43%98th pct56th pct +1.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5099488+1.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.1%8267-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work42,055 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.1%6652-0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability31.5%8852-1.0CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.9142·28·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.6%4246+0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1319374+1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.1%4241+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.2654·66·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments159———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.562·5·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%619+0.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents10.738·59·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.1%9459-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort756———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income756———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.4%5224+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.3%4437-0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.4%8648-0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.6%8450+1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people53.592·96·+1.7
Coronary heart disease6.2%6234-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%5260-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.3%4435-0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year64.3%10079+1.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.5924·19·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression22.6%7063-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.3%7457-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.07984·49·+0.9
Economic connectedness1.019285+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9038566+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.50260·32·+0.3
Education score-0.03960·40·+0.3
Effective property tax rate1.790·93·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,253———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents15.154·38·-0.4
Fair or poor self-rated health18.7%8861-1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.74470+0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.43%9856+1.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.2%8862-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.4%7053-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%9061-1.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.024710097-1.6Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12854·77·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4228876-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$333,430k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.11696·60·+1.6
Hearing disability7.5%4824-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.6%7051-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.1%6065-0.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate76.2%52·60·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.1%8260-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units2,672———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate57215·16·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-3,35224·23·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.7%8250-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain99.46946-0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,13421·17·-0.8
Jail population rate22923·20·-0.3
Labour force2,306———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8%8863-1.0CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21%9784-1.4CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.5 years9465+1.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.1%8887-1.2CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents34.898·98·+3.4
Mammography in the past two years70.5%5425+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.45792·62·+1.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,7934424-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$50,08856·34·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$53,44078·53·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.7 min4675-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age46 years72·82·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$63816·9·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$76,00010·1·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,611—24—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,9816826+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,29044·38·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.118%6889+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations32.310099+3.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.3%7849-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99752·75·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-3.78·6·-1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.31362·56·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.6%5841-0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity41.6%1616+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,994———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents4.3282·82·+0.6
Owner-occupied housing units1,519———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,230———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return224·28·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,832———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,4654832+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$55,7397255+0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$256,850k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,608———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,627———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,761———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,574———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,287———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,230———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line665———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line542———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,557———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,555———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,310———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher834———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,674———
Poverty rate14.6%6942-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.9%9663-1.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4189666-1.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,985———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,889———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,671———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,686———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,529———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,657———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,443———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population66.7%54·53·+0.3
Preventable hospital stays2,5924257+0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate34320·19·-0.4
Private job growth1.3159·44·+0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,472———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03027890+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.2%12·21·-1.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents64.972·83·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200078.898·95·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200478.786·92·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.678·90·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201281.784·93·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.482·90·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202083.782·89·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202483.578·86·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20244.7218·33·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.61%62·37·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit12.2%0·28·-1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains25.2%98·90·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%22·9·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.6%76·41·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%8048-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over26.4%82·91·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%25·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.8%20·33·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.49%16·19·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.5%88·93·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%14·17·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.8%90·79·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.93%16·12·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.7%96·90·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.88%74·86·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher25.4%8866+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.2%10088-1.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.85100·99·+2.8
Stroke3.1%8450-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication60.3%98·79·+1.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,300———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,299———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.7%7038-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population4,662———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01733021-0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed53———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.3%9491-1.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate25.4%48·83·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units678———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.7%8858-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50806———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,036———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,5659879-1.1County Health Rankings

5of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.