placestats

Jefferson County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7155
Density4.8people per km² of land
Median household income$60,568
Land area1477km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Jefferson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Bon Homme County, SD, Washington County, AL, Menominee County, WI, Carroll County, MO, Klamath County, OR, Wayne County, IA, Johnson County, NE, Rio Grande County, CO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Jefferson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents26.598th pct by value95th pct by value +1.9 sd
Cognitive disability13.2%96th pct89th pct -1.8 sd
Share in the same house a year ago93.2%100th pct by value96th pct by value +1.8 sd
Frequent mental distress15.7%96th pct92nd pct -1.7 sd
Frequent physical distress11.7%100th pct86th pct -1.7 sd
Independent-living disability7.2%96th pct84th pct -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5158890+1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.4%6362-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work57,215 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.4%8878-1.2CDC PLACES
Any disability27.9%9278-1.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.4118·19·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.7%7875-0.9CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.07746565+0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.7%169+1.2CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain90.177·93·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.3
Business closing rate5.336·5·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments207———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.818·6·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%5344+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.3220·33·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.8%8271-0.9Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort1,037———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,037———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.1%4520-0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.8%9475-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.2%9689-1.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.1%5837+0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.384·84·+0.9
Coronary heart disease5.4%9473-1.6CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.4%9293-1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.3%8260-0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61%5061+0.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.1380·62·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Depression19.5%9091-1.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.8%7468-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.73998·81·+1.5
Economic connectedness0.8584862+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.6892327-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.90278·55·+0.7
Education score0.98393·94·+1.5
Effective property tax rate1.4588·86·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,282———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents32.980·75·+0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health16.1%9885-1.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.95665-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.27%2410-0.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.6%8978-0.9CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain191———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.7%9692-1.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.7%10086-1.7CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06273651+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11936·60·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.49492-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$583,460k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.20382·66·+0.9
Hearing disability6.8%8853-1.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.5%8881-1.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.3%9294-1.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate72.2%28·39·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.8%10089-1.2CDC PLACES
Housing units3,664———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate77137·31·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$15,04086·89·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.2%9684-1.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain78.77876-0.8County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,58430·33·-0.3
Jail population rate38548·45·-0.2
Labour force3,366———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.9%9786-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.6%4663-0.3CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.04768794+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy76.6 years7066+0.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.9%5465-0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents26.598·95·+1.9
Mammography in the past two years72.7%5642+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.89398·87·+1.5
Mean adjusted gross income per return$71,4837859+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$54,91860·50·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$39,8782·8·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.8 min8286-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.7 years72·76·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$65914·10·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$117,60022·19·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,568—42—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$63,7077253+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,70958·57·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0625%2035-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.27891+0.7County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.3%9677-1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99778·80·+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.48458·42·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.726·4·-1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.9%5346-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity37.6%6555-0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,114———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0120·14·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units2,247———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,530———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return234·45·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,808———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,5764038-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$61,3138071+0.9BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$435,140k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,097———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,054———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,810———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,436———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,036———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,765———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain690———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line762———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,988———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,927———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,672———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher992———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,240———
Poverty rate uncertain9.87%9478-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11%8671-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4187665-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,847———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,011———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,697———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,446———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,494———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,716———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,631———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population43.8%32·24·-0.5
Preventable hospital stays1,1419497-1.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate38531·24·-0.6
Private job growth2.0258·55·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,778———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02776886+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9%14·19·-1.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents63.784·82·+1.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200063.356·65·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200465.864·64·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20085846·50·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201264.454·56·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201674.152·61·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207242·56·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20247348·55·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.6442·51·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.19%72·50·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.6%36·39·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.1%96·88·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.16%20·28·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.8%37·28·-0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%10082-1.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.7%80·85·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.8%32·33·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.67%38·37·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race5.3%55·49·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago93.2%100·96·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%91·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.9%12·10·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married58.2%84·85·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic91.1%68·77·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.02%88·87·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.7%4639-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.3%7687-0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.56858·82·+0.4
Stroke2.8%9676-1.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%59·54·+0.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,450———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken13,532———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.7%9584-1.3CDC PLACES
Total population7,155———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.02028284+0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed84———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%8086-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate15%34·50·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units550———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%9679-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,343———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain121———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,050———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,5908678-0.7County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.