placestats

Johnson County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5263
Density5.4people per km² of land
Median household income$59,457
Land area974km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Johnson County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Sawyer County, WI, Comanche County, TX, Red Willow County, NE, Val Verde County, TX, Potter County, PA, Leon County, TX, Greene County, IA, Van Buren County, IA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Johnson Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Frequent mental distress14.4%100th pct99th pct -3.0 sd
Depression16.1%100th pct99th pct -2.8 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population0%0th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.5 sd
Binge drinking23.7%0th pct1st pct +2.4 sd
Poverty rate6.81%100th pct95th pct -2.4 sd
Gini index of income inequality0.376100th pct98th pct -2.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5339693+1.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12.6%2530-0.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work49,015 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.4%3418+0.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.4%8263-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability27.9%9478-1.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0834·33·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21%9692-1.8CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1659279+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.7%01+2.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents070·45·-0.4
Business closing rate13.398·97·+1.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments94———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.12·4·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%6969-0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.860·62·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.8%9477-1.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.195%47·32·-0.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort629———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income629———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80%1210-1.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.9%9273-1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.1%10090-2.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.5%4832-0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.722·54·-0.7
Coronary heart disease5.7%8457-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma8.5%100100-1.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.7%7855-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62%8067+0.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.3238·39·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression16.1%10099-2.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.1%7161-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.6298·75·+1.4
Economic connectedness0.7914046-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.949472+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.41226·27·-0.5
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.5284·88·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,880———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents16.542·43·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health17.2%9275-1.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.34056+0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%3215-0.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.5%6160-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress14.4%10099-3.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.8%9685-1.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.1231211+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11722·56·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.37610098-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$247,840k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.10782·60·+0.9
Hearing disability7.2%4934-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31%7466-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.2%8486-1.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate68.5%14·24·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.5%7167-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units2,090———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$19,64994·93·+1.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7%10087-1.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain96.74451-0.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate5887·6·-0.3
Jail population rate82.46·3·-1.1
Labour force1,942———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.7%7669-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.1%4045+0.2CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.9 years9878+1.3County Health Rankings
Loneliness30.5%9791-1.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.972·75·+0.2
Mammography in the past two years68.9%1816-1.0CDC PLACES
Material security score0.922100·88·+1.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$64,6136238+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$63,59684·71·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,94722·20·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work25.6 min3040+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age40.1 years22·36·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$77759·33·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$131,50046·27·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,457—39—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$64,1349054+1.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,99384·67·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.08%5060-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.25669-0.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.5%9674-1.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99312·45·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-8.162·1·-2.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.23938·30·-0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.1%4132+0.0CDC PLACES
Obesity38.1%6550-0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,750———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.4732·23·-0.6
Owner-occupied housing units1,198———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,850———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return234·53·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,346———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$25,9421013-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$45,9231419-1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$239,490k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,215———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,198———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,416———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,248———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,757———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over970———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain293———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line525———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,303———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,070———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,506———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher713———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,290———
Poverty rate uncertain6.81%10095-2.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.9%6655-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4716052-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,112———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,394———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,110———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,063———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,089———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,229———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,152———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%0·2·-2.5
Preventable hospital stays2,8973043+0.5County Health Rankings
Private job growth-4.376·5·-0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs657———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0131219-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.8%18·27·-0.9CDC PLACES
Religious adherents39.730·31·-0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200060.456·55·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200462.450·54·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200855.536·42·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201260.840·47·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201670.638·51·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202070.136·52·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202470.532·48·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.240·53·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.99%38·22·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.9%2·27·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains20.9%90·78·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.49%34·40·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year70.9%10·14·-1.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%9067-1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.4%14·38·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain4.66%78·53·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.8%48·49·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race11.7%73·73·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.6%20·24·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%94·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married33.3%82·75·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married49%20·30·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.1%58·44·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.49%44·39·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic78.1%40·46·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.91%8·28·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19%4635-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.7%8885-1.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.34564·72·+0.3
Stroke3%7858-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%88·70·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,010———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,045———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.6%7468-0.8CDC PLACES
Total population5,263———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed62———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.2%5459-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate16.3%24·56·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units340———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.6%7161-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50778———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,912———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain7,9958874-0.8County Health Rankings

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.