placestats

Menominee County, WI

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4256
Density4.6people per km² of land
Median household income$59,528
Land area926km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Menominee County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Klamath County, OR, Wayne County, IA, Gila County, AZ, Price County, WI, Jefferson County, NE, Mackinac County, MI, Texas County, OK, Johnson County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Menominee Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Effective property tax rate3.64100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.6 sd
Net business formation rate21.3100th pct by value100th pct by value +6.1 sd
Years of potential life lost27,9370th pct0th pct +5.7 sd
Business opening rate21.3100th pct by value100th pct by value +5.2 sd
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic78.4%100th pct by value100th pct by value +4.9 sd
Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.2740th pct1st pct -4.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.27401-4.8Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.3%4751-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain25,575 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.75%32+1.8County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.8%3834+0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability39.1%811+1.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.0262·52·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.8%2231+0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.75601-2.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18%5342-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents086·45·-0.2
Business closing rate00·2·-3.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments25———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate21.3100·100·+5.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.1%9088-1.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2290·84·+0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1745.5%01+4.6Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.478%98·97·+3.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,242———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,242———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.5%5726+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.5%3334+0.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.2%2727+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.9%5636+0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people9.40·12·-1.7
Coronary heart disease7%410+1.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma14.1%00+3.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking23.9%22+2.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year53.2%3025-0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.8280·77·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression24.1%4748+0.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes15.3%65+2.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.224·9·-1.8
Drug overdose deaths uncertain123—0—County Health Rankings
Economic connectedness0.42901-2.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.2172·5·-2.5
Education score-0.38528·22·-0.7
Effective property tax rate uncertain3.64100·100·+6.6Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,315———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents2.352·2·-1.3
Fair or poor self-rated health26.1%813+1.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.85067-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.53%9689+2.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity28.9%35+3.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress20.7%213+1.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress17.2%25+2.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.07622640+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.189100·99·+4.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4029291-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$207,650k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.7894·11·-1.7
Hearing disability8.7%85+1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.4%2036+0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.1%8487-0.9CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.975%10099+1.4County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate73.5%38·46·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity21.4%37+3.2CDC PLACES
Housing units2,148———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0977—0—Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate80938·33·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$9,84174·79·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability12.1%27+2.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths22500+3.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,20757·55·-0.2
Jail population rate65076·76·+0.3
Labour force1,396———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation15.7%34+3.4CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support27.5%816+1.6CDC PLACES
Life expectancy63 years00-4.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness36.2%323+1.9CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents00·1·-1.3
Mammography in the past two years73.9%6653+0.6CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.252·6·-3.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$49,59824-2.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$53,88950·47·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,04822·20·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work20.6 min7075-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age33.8 years14·6·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$62412·7·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$97,0006·8·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$59,528—39—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$49,791213-1.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain3,527100·90·+3.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.103%7082+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.151620-1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17.9%49+1.9CDC PLACES
Mobility score-4.31—0·—
Mutual-friend share198·98·+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate21.3100·100·+6.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.79624·15·-0.7IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity35.8%66+1.8CDC PLACES
Obesity45.4%43+1.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,336———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.0228·17·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units982———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,680———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return282·88·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,139———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$22,83446-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$42,46689-1.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$179,250k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,221———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,226———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,157———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,882———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,479———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over662———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain895———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,154———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,224———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,212———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,908———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher486———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,255———
Poverty rate uncertain21.2%414+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)27.4%03+3.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality1,04701+4.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,233———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,710———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,448———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,377———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,279———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,590———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,572———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population55.7%42·39·-0.1
Preventable hospital stays3,0552436+0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1600·3·-1.2
Private job growth-5.290·4·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs161———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03088291+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps28.3%100·97·+4.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents24.44·4·-1.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200019.20·0·-4.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200416.90·0·-3.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200812.80·0·-3.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201213.10·0·-3.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201621.12·1·-3.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202017.60·1·-3.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202418.90·1·-4.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-0.2156·20·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.11%4·7·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit35.6%100·99·+4.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains7.22%6·6·-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.33%72·78·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.7%88·55·+1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.9%815+1.5CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over15.6%12·16·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic78.4%100·100·+4.9Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.16%2·2·-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.3%55·41·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago91.8%86·90·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%90·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married41.6%94·93·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married44.8%12·15·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women83.3%—95·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic11.8%0·1·-3.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.49%16·40·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.6%3839-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.5%1231+1.0CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.5098·20·-1.6
Stroke4.2%27+2.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.6%94·71·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,800———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,416———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off13.4%313+2.2CDC PLACES
Total population4,256———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.033665-1.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed81———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate5.8%46+1.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate37.8%84·96·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units812———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.1%66+1.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50844———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,241———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost27,93700+5.7County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.