placestats

Garfield County, UT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5170
Density0.4people per km² of land
Median household income$61,688
Land area13,415km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Garfield County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Lake County, OR, Loup County, NE, Cherry County, NE, Hayes County, NE, Keya Paha County, NE, Haakon County, SD, Motley County, TX, Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, AK. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Garfield Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Other religion adherents90.6100th pct by value100th pct by value +8.3 sd
Jail population rate3,514100th pct by value99th pct by value +6.0 sd
Unemployment rate7.9%0th pct1st pct +4.3 sd
Returns claiming charitable contributions6.25%100th pct by value84th pct by value +3.6 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation7.08%100th pct by value98th pct by value +3.5 sd
Binge drinking12.8%100th pct98th pct -3.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5817198+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.4%6262-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain28,065 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.25%5565-0.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.2%2051+0.5CDC PLACES
Any disability29.2%6069-0.3CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying7.6185·77·+1.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.3%5266-0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1314974+0.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking12.8%10098-3.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate10.862·87·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments166———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.5850·53·+0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.7%23+1.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents6.0238·41·-0.4
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.9%8665-0.8Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort747———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income747———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.5%4814-0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.2%9889-1.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.4%5062+0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.3%7039+0.6CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people35.426·82·-0.7
Coronary heart disease5.2%8682-1.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.8%4442+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking9.8%9897-2.6CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65.7%8685+1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.0880·61·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression26.4%1024+1.1CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.9%6886-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.54670·71·+0.5
Economic connectedness16084+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.15—93—Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.66520·41·-0.7
Education score0.396—69·—
Effective property tax rate0.386·5·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,177———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents0.716·1·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health16.3%8083-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.87997-0.6County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised125—74·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate32.4—100·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.24%487-0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.1%7183-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress17.3%5474-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.7%5468-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.009585693-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12356·67·-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4582437+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$385,510k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.082778·58·+0.7
Hearing disability7.2%5634-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure28.3%8690-1.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.4%3483-0.0CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.875%—40—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate73.5%34·46·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.9%7488-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units3,589———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate3,916—99·—
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,34444·45·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.3%8282-0.8CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain102—43—County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate3,44782·75·+0.6
Jail population rate3,514100·99·+6.0
Labour force2,364———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7%7784-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support19.6%9497-1.2CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.6 years5676+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.9%2177+0.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents010·1·-1.2
Mammography in the past two years68.9%2216-0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.61877·72·+0.7
Mean income of arriving households$62,95576·70·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$61,61177·73·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work uncertain13.6 min8698-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median age41 years16·45·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$78153·34·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$285,80094·83·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$61,688—45—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$64,8448256+0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,08739·29·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0553%1725-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations0505-0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.1%7280-0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99325·48·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.236·17·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying1.5291·86·+1.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity18.1%9897-1.9CDC PLACES
Obesity28.9%9495-1.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,027———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents90.6100·100·+8.3
Owner-occupied housing units1,490———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,770———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return272·76·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,142———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,9352240-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,0931230-1.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$261,170k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,320———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,314———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)4,737———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over4,290———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,137———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,698———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,173———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain557———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line521———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,013———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,210———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,755———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,184———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,083———
Poverty rate uncertain11.1%5968-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10%9079-1.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3587981-0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,968———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,162———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,159———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,182———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,344———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,732———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,811———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%12·2·-1.8
Preventable hospital stays2,5493358+0.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate402—26·—
Private job growth-8.5612·2·-0.8BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,890———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.04087597+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps6.7%3·4·-1.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents97.394·99·+1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200090.6100·100·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200487.592·99·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200880.975·96·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201285.675·97·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201681.829·85·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.825·82·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.321·76·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-10.30·5·-2.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions6.25%100·84·+3.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.2%76·43·+0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.1%10·60·-1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation7.08%100·98·+3.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.8%50·20·+0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%8482-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.7%32·75·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%88·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced10.6%44·30·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race6.98%68·58·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92%62·91·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.1%65·21·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.2%62·92·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm71.4%—80·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share White, not Hispanic89.3%52·71·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.17%7·15·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher32%9281+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.8%1056+1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.069423·54·-0.7
Stroke2.8%7476-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication50.4%10·3·-1.4CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,400———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,008———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.9%7481-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population5,170———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed187———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate7.9%01+4.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate43.5%92·98·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,562———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.2%7276-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,069———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,065———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain8,727—65—County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.