placestats

Motley County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population1267
Density0.5people per km² of land
Median household income$62,857
Land area2563km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Motley County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Stonewall County, TX, Wibaux County, MT, Valley County, MT, Jones County, SD, Keya Paha County, NE, Hayes County, NE, Garfield County, UT, Lake County, OR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Motley Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Adults under 65 without health insurance16.4%4th pct12th pct +2.4 sd
Child poverty rate, ages 0-1728.4%0th pct12th pct +2.3 sd
Median household income (model-based)$48,9520th pct12th pct -1.9 sd
Returns reporting capital gains12.5%0th pct by value34th pct by value -1.8 sd
High cholesterol32.2%6th pct49th pct +1.8 sd
Economy score0.2632nd pct by value20th pct by value -1.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.416647-1.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance16.4%412+2.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain10,060 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.667%232+1.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.7%8476-0.6CDC PLACES
Any disability31.8%2850+0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying889·82·+1.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.5%7277-0.8CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.2031027-1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19.2%5826-0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate1484·98·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate18.694·99·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%9069-1.5CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents7.1536·46·-0.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain28.4%012+2.3Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort302———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening83.2%8656+1.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.5%4057+0.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.4%2648+0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.1%6437+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people84.790·100·+1.7
Coronary heart disease5.7%4857-0.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%7269-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.2%6261-0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year56.7%1839-1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.974·56·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression24.5%3044+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.5%1653+0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.16136·53·-0.2
Economy score0.2632·20·-1.8
Employed466———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents47.792·91·+1.4
Fair or poor self-rated health20.8%1643+1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.83586-0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.31%6917+0.4County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress19%2040+0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.5%3053+0.3CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4028291-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$59,177k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.53624·21·-0.6
Hearing disability6.7%8257-0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.2%1855+1.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.2%649+1.8CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate76.9%56·65·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Housing units746———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate69414·25·-0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-19,87611·2·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.6%2652+0.4CDC PLACES
Jail population rate06·1·-0.6
Labour force484———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents9.544·69·-0.4
Mammography in the past two years70.2%3623-0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.2526·50·-0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$50,55805-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,34630·25·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$67,22283·82·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.7 min3086+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age51.4 years94·95·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$72540·21·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$62,857—49—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$48,952012-1.9Census SAIPE
Membership organisations0325-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.2%2250+0.7CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate4.6584·92·+0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying2.0997·93·+1.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.3%2651+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity35.8%5270-0.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units476———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents054·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units366———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return930———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return262·61·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move813———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,8821029-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$57,5643261-0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$58,888k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,023———BEA Regional Accounts
Population1,020———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over1,092———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over819———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over953———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over393———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line171———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,267———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined1,018———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago1,196———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain210———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census1,063———
Poverty rate uncertain9.71%8179-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)16.8%1028+1.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain608823+1.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 2000642———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004684———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008594———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012600———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016615———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020652———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024650———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Prison population rate69456·59·-0.2
Private job growth4.3782·81·+0.5BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs239———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents64.376·82·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200081.363·97·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200483.383·97·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200888.696·100·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201290.794·99·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201693.494·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202092.990·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202494.594·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.294·66·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%48·5·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit16.7%94·58·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.5%0·34·-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.9%52·21·+0.4CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%3053+0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over31%92·97·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%82·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain13.8%82·79·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.4%90·98·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain20.2%24·5·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.9%40·79·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%81·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic83.3%32·55·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain9.07%64·88·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain22%4052-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.8%248+1.6CDC PLACES
Stroke3%4858-0.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57%62·28·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed480———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,188———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population1,267———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed18———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.7%1639+0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate36.2%88·95·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units270———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.1%2045+0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain203———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute537———Census ACS 5-year

14of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.