placestats

Hayes County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population854
Density0.5people per km² of land
Median household income$60,313
Land area1847km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Hayes County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Keya Paha County, NE, Stonewall County, TX, Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, AK, Loup County, NE, Lake County, OR, Daggett County, UT, Garfield County, UT, Haakon County, SD. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Hayes Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net business formation rate-18.84th pct by value0th pct by value -2.3 sd
People per tax return298th pct by value98th pct by value +2.3 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.48%96th pct74th pct +2.0 sd
Depression18.8%88th pct94th pct -1.7 sd
Current asthma9.3%94th pct94th pct -1.6 sd
Returns reporting capital gains38.5%94th pct by value100th pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.6158899+1.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.4%4250-0.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain7,405 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%6394-1.1County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.3%2450+0.4CDC PLACES
Any disability27.8%8879-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.7132·8·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.1%8882-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.1562433-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.7%229+0.7CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate18.890·100·+1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate024·2·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%6444-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents014·6·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.8%5850-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort222———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.8%6017+0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.1%7068-0.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.4%8888-1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.5%5424+0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people58.476·97·+0.6
Coronary heart disease5.7%5057-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%9494-1.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.4%5459-0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.6%4254-0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.5663·47·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression18.8%8894-1.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.9%4266+0.2CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.61486·75·+0.8
Economy score1.4688·81·+1.1
Effective property tax rate1.2787·78·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed427———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents20.368·52·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health16.7%7679-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.73888-0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.48%9674+2.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.6%3668-0.2CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain46———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress15.7%8692-1.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.1%8080-0.8CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4385459-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$122,330k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.41794·78·+1.4
Hearing disability7.2%6234-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.4%5271-0.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.6%6491-0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate71.1%22·35·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.7%5277-0.4CDC PLACES
Housing units479———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-17,04011·2·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.4%8279-0.8CDC PLACES
Labour force436———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.3%7678-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.4%6480-0.5CDC PLACES
Loneliness31.3%4284-0.1CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents18.672·90·+0.5
Mammography in the past two years73.6%7850+0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.47561·63·+0.4
Mean income of arriving households$34,8000·2·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$51,84051·48·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.9 min1260+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age48.7 years66·91·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$112,80025·16·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,313—42—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$59,9665242-0.1Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,42969·45·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0425-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.4%7075-0.6CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate-18.84·0·-2.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.858·4·-1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity28%839+1.3CDC PLACES
Obesity41.8%216+1.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units357———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents048·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units254———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return840———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return298·98·+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move755———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,6397665+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$93,6708896+1.2BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$78,683k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population840———BEA Regional Accounts
Population846———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over696———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over629———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over640———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over221———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain105———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line114———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined854———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined844———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago787———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain102———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census856———
Poverty rate uncertain12.3%4960-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain13.5%5650-0.0Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000571———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004598———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008553———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012539———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016514———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020534———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024494———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth-4.0820·5·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs94———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps9.8%58·27·-0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents38.930·30·-0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20008898·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200488.8100·100·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200884.492·99·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201290.392·99·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201694100·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202093.696·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202496.1100·100·+1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20248.0967·44·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%54·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%20·1·-1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains38.5%94·100·+1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%66·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.6%76·26·+0.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.2%7672-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.9%60·89·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%87·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%—5·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain8.33%19·7·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain5.39%—65·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain6.44%68·55·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.2%76·91·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain17.1%10·1·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married65.1%86·98·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.4%76·83·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain9.48%80·91·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain15.9%619-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.6%6686-0.5CDC PLACES
Stroke2.9%6467-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%96·64·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed390———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken892———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.4%5872-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population854———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed9———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.1%8094-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain25.5%42·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain122———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%6668-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50156———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute324———Census ACS 5-year

16of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.