placestats

Keya Paha County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population939
Density0.5people per km² of land
Median household income$60,313
Land area2002km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Keya Paha County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Hayes County, NE, Stonewall County, TX, Prince of Wales-Hyder Census Area, AK, Loup County, NE, Lake County, OR, Daggett County, UT, Garfield County, UT, Irion County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Keya Paha Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net business formation rate19.4100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.7 sd
Returns reporting capital gains41.5%100th pct by value100th pct by value +2.1 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths1%0th pct0th pct +1.9 sd
Depression18.5%92nd pct95th pct -1.7 sd
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%18th pct by value1st pct by value -1.6 sd
Current asthma9.3%94th pct94th pct -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5727097+0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.4%7262-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work8,125 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths1%00+1.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.3%3857+0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability27.8%8879-0.9CDC PLACES
Arthritis22.3%8080-1.0CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.1%207+0.9CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate016·2·-1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate19.498·99·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%3819+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents014·6·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.6%3641+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort200———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.5%5614-0.0CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.3%6062-0.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.2%9289-1.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52%1811-0.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people6586·99·+0.9
Coronary heart disease5.8%4452+0.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.3%9494-1.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.7%4655+0.0CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.8%6871+0.4CDC PLACES
Depression18.5%9295-1.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.7%5070-0.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.61988·75·+0.8
Economy score0.80538·49·-0.3
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.1479·72·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Employed345———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents5194·93·+1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health16.1%9085-0.9CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter56996-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.19%333-0.5County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.9%7075-0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.5%9493-1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.9%9083-1.0CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.4642231+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$47,885k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.97612·6·-1.5
Hearing disability7.3%5431-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.7%4469+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.9%5888-0.3CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate80.1%72·82·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10%7986-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units495———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7.4%8279-0.8CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,36836·25·-0.5
Jail population rate14321·8·-0.6
Labour force357———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.2%8279-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.6%8590-0.9CDC PLACES
Loneliness29.9%8895-1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents16.964·88·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years71.8%5034+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.29641·53·+0.0
Mean travel time to work22.7 min1462+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age49 years74·92·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$86773·54·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$108,80025·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$60,313—42—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$52,077819-1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain1,24049·36·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0405-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.4%7275-0.6CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate19.4100·100·+2.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity26.4%2450+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity38%2651+0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units327———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents046·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units262———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return760———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return222·32·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move661———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,3884048-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,8635480-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$53,758k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population804———BEA Regional Accounts
Population805———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over771———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over656———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over630———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over233———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain139———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined939———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined803———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago884———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain162———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census769———
Poverty rate uncertain10.4%8373-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain17.3%825+1.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000513———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004549———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008533———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012484———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016519———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020529———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024544———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%18·2·-1.5
Private job growth2.8266·66·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs73———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Received food stamps9.7%52·26·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents67.974·86·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200084.490·99·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200481.969·96·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200878.167·94·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201283.173·95·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20169290·99·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202090.785·99·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202491.988·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20247.5158·42·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%52·5·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%18·1·-1.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains41.5%100·100·+2.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%66·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.4%66·25·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.2%7672-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.8%46·86·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%29·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%84·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain7.26%9·2·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94.1%92·98·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain27.1%78·43·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married58.4%54·86·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.8%86·91·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain7.26%39·57·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain25.7%6667+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours30.9%8894-1.2CDC PLACES
Stroke2.9%6467-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%96·64·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed410———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken800———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.2%7075-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population939———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed12———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%3051+0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate33.9%74·93·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units168———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.3%7872-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain185———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute358———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.