placestats

King County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population189
Density0.1people per km² of land
Median household income$70,192
Land area2359km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like King County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Dillingham Census Area, AK, Southeast Fairbanks Census Area, AK, Eureka County, NV, Lincoln County, NV, Harding County, SD, Bethel Census Area, AK, Copper River Census Area, AK, Garfield County, MT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where King Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Evangelical Protestant adherents452100th pct by value100th pct by value +18.5 sd
Religious adherents452100th pct by value100th pct by value +15.3 sd
Per capita personal income$146,97098th pct100th pct +3.7 sd
Share in the same house a year ago74.1%0th pct by value1st pct by value -3.3 sd
Adults under 65 without health insurance17%0th pct10th pct +2.8 sd
Share widowed0%3rd pct by value0th pct by value -2.7 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adults under 65 without health insurance17%010+2.8CDC PLACES
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%5594-0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over26%66+2.3CDC PLACES
Any disability35.4%1228+1.1CDC PLACES
Arthritis23.8%3058+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.2267188+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19%7028-0.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 500—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents098·45·-0.1
Business closing rate030·2·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened0———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate030·2·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%7669-0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents022·6·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain10.2%10089-1.6Census SAIPE
Cholesterol screening81.5%6426+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.9%1226+1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.4%1225+1.3CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening49.5%124-1.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people75.586·99·+1.1
Coronary heart disease6.7%1216+1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%5251-0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.8%2430+0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year44.2%65-1.9CDC PLACES
Depression25.5%1633+1.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes12.2%1427+1.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.58112·25·-0.9
Economy score1.6290·86·+1.1
Education score1.91—100·—
Employed212———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents452100·100·+18.5
Fair or poor self-rated health24.1%1222+1.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.11481+0.9County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress20.2%819+1.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.1%1225+0.8CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality uncertain0.4393458+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$115,680k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.63324·17·-0.4
Hearing disability7.7%3019-0.0CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35%832+1.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33%437+2.1CDC PLACES
Housing units uncertain148———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability10.3%1223+1.1CDC PLACES
Jail population rate05·1·-0.8
Labour force215———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents024·1·-1.0
Mammography in the past two years70.7%4426+0.1CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$52,000117-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain12.5 min8299-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$70,192—68—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$85,7209690+1.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain54110·6·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0705-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.4%1227+1.3CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate062·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity29.1%1032+1.5CDC PLACES
Obesity37.8%2653+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units uncertain90———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents088·78·-0.3
Other religion adherents046·11·-0.5
People covered by a tax return200———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return270·79·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move168———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain$30,8901234-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$146,97098100+3.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$31,599k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population215———BEA Regional Accounts
Population217———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over uncertain157———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over168———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over uncertain154———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line21———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined uncertain189———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined216———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago uncertain140———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census265———
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain9.7%9282-1.0Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000137———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004156———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008163———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012145———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016159———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020159———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024135———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Private job growth-10.58·1·-1.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs342———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents452100·100·+15.3
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200089.689·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200488.486·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200895100·100·+2.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201296.5100·100·+2.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201696.8100·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20209594·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20249586·100·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20245.4751·36·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%62·5·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%32·1·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains0%0·0·-1.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%58·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.8%68·20·+0.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.6%1220+1.3CDC PLACES
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%39·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%78·14·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic0%70·5·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago uncertain74.1%0·1·-3.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married uncertain80.9%98·100·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic67.2%23·31·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed0%3·0·-2.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours40.4%823+1.5CDC PLACES
Stroke3.5%1825+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.7%80·40·+1.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed100———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken736———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population uncertain189———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.0582—100—Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed3———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate1.4%100100-1.4BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate39.2%78·96·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain58———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability6.2%1423+0.7CDC PLACES
Women who gave birth in the past year0———Census ACS 5-year

19of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.