placestats

Dawes County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8212
Density2.3people per km² of land
Median household income$54,381
Land area3617km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Dawes County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Haskell County, TX, Pawnee County, NE, Chautauqua County, KS, Hill County, MT, Republic County, KS, San Saba County, TX, Floyd County, TX, Rio Arriba County, NM. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Dawes Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Cognitive disability12.5%100th pct95th pct -2.9 sd
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher35.2%98th pct87th pct +2.7 sd
Frequent mental distress15.3%100th pct95th pct -2.7 sd
Economic connectedness in high school1.04100th pct84th pct +2.3 sd
Median gross rent$1,01498th pct by value74th pct by value +2.2 sd
Frequent physical distress11.5%100th pct89th pct -2.2 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5159290+1.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.2%8880-0.9CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work53,070 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.8%51+1.7County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.6%9483-1.6CDC PLACES
Any disability28%9878-1.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.7376·65·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.4%8679-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1629179+1.4Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking22%48+2.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents080·45·-0.3
Black-white residential segregation35.8—21·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate10.982·89·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments222———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed24———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened29———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate13.286·92·+1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1019+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents12.654·65·-0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.3%8653-1.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort934———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income934———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%6631+0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.7%9677-1.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability12.5%10095-2.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52.2%4012-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people25.628·61·-0.8
Coronary heart disease5.4%9873-2.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.5%9291-1.2CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking14.4%9471-1.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.1%8467+0.9CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.3488·84·+1.2IRS county migration flows
Depression18.8%9894-1.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.6%8872-1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.76498·83·+1.9
Economic connectedness1.039687+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.0410084+2.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.39950·26·-0.1
Education score0.28272·61·+0.8
Effective property tax rate uncertain1.3463·81·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,154———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents11.932·28·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health15.7%9888-1.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.89097-1.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.36%7830+0.7County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.2%9782-1.3CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.3%10095-2.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.5%10089-2.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02346579-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1120·40·-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4119686-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$369,590k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.24596·69·+1.9
Hearing disability6.9%9248-1.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.3%8073-1.0CDC PLACES
High cholesterol27.7%9897-1.8CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.82%—14—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate65.7%2·17·-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.8%9789-1.5CDC PLACES
Housing units4,013———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate4728·11·-0.6
Income gap between arrivals and departures$46538·41·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.1%9886-2.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain92.77957-0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate85311·10·-1.0
Jail population rate27232·27·-0.3
Labour force4,254———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7%9784-1.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.2%9793-1.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.0578996+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.9 years8257+0.8County Health Rankings
Loneliness29.7%10096-1.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents1472·83·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years71.4%6631+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.595100·71·+1.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$60,1164425-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,47634·17·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,01128·20·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work13.9 min9897-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median age35.2 years8·9·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$1,01498·74·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$146,50072·36·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$54,381—26—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,9256626+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,97092·66·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.107%6484+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations15.86684+0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11%9881-1.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99646·67·+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.2872·74·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.60928·19·-0.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.5%7658-0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity38.3%5648+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,381———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents2.7362·67·+0.1
Owner-occupied housing units2,222———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,410———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return228·30·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,749———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,6233628-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$50,4923636-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$411,260k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,145———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,133———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,001———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,654———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,093———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,594———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line932———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,162———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,395———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,449———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,577———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,791———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census8,199———
Poverty rate12.6%8857-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based) uncertain15.6%5835-0.4Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4478858-0.8County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,621———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,994———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,775———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,728———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,676———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,121———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,868———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population66.7%57·53·+0.3
Preventable hospital stays1,8126884-0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate2545·11·-0.5
Private job growth-0.45635·22·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,964———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03167891+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps9.1%6·20·-1.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents41.328·35·-0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.692·91·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200471.562·80·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200864.950·67·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201268.646·67·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201676.746·69·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207338·59·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.938·57·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 2024-1.674·17·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.31%58·30·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.1%20·43·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24.8%92·90·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.15%38·27·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.8%56·28·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.1%9877-1.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over19.4%26·47·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain0.999%—54·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain5.8%0·1·-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.76%38·44·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago80.1%4·4·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married41.2%94·93·+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married46.1%20·19·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain4.65%72·82·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic86.4%66·62·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain6.91%28·50·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher35.2%9887+2.7Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.8%6871-0.7CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.0892·95·+1.4
Stroke2.8%9876-1.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.1%72·64·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,470———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,392———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.1%9777-1.6CDC PLACES
Total population8,212———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain0.02137385+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed100———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.4%8889-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain15.7%10·54·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain632———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%9879-1.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,282———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,829———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,7068053-0.6County Health Rankings

13of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.