placestats

Chautauqua County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population3370
Density2.0people per km² of land
Median household income$54,592
Land area1655km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Chautauqua County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: San Saba County, TX, Floyd County, TX, Hill County, MT, Dawes County, NE, Pawnee County, NE, Sanders County, MT, Trinity County, CA, Haskell County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Chautauqua Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic8.04%98th pct by value97th pct by value +2.9 sd
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%14th pct by value5th pct by value -1.7 sd
Business opening rate15.396th pct by value97th pct by value +1.6 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%80th pct94th pct -1.4 sd
Current cigarette smoking20.1%6th pct13th pct +1.4 sd
Net business formation rate6.7890th pct by value97th pct by value +1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4484469-0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.5%5439-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work31,060 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%8094-1.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.9%7460-0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability35.4%2228+0.4CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.7112·8·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.4%3037+0.6CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.09796444+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.1%7258-0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents080·45·-0.3
Business closing rate8.4736·49·-0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments61———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed5———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate15.396·97·+1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%5660+0.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.982·13·-1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain24.8%4221+0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.243%54·56·+0.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort678———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income678———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening79.9%229-0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.3%819+1.2CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.4%2825+0.6CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening52%3611-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people53.382·96·+1.2
Coronary heart disease6.8%1214+1.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%4239+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking20.1%613+1.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year56.3%4237+0.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1546·33·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression23.2%5457-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes11.3%3639-0.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.53930·26·-0.3
Economic connectedness0.8275555+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.25624·20·-0.7
Education score-1.0715·5·-1.1
Effective property tax rate1.682·91·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,264———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.136·29·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health22%4435-0.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.51224+1.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%6015+0.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity18%3934+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.7%2628+0.5CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.5%4835-0.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02565778-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12452·69·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4416456-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$112,700k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.42940·26·-0.2
Hearing disability8.2%1410+0.8CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.3%1637+0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.5%4459+0.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate83.3%92·94·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity14.6%3633+0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units1,971———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,81174·86·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,22724·32·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10%2627+0.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1085033-0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,47439·29·-0.3
Jail population rate51760·63·-0.2
Labour force1,308———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.8%4634-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.8%4961-0.3CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.069174-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy74 years5037+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.8%6178-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents15.778·86·+0.4
Mammography in the past two years69.1%4217-0.3CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.10949·32·+0.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,3792917-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$42,60422·12·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$43,83128·19·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.9 min2253+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.3 years54·79·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$71347·18·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$63,3002·1·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$54,592—26—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$49,5102613-0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,01216·26·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.131%8493+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations14.66078+0.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.3%2827+0.4CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99764·77·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate6.7890·97·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.4410·6·-1.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity30.6%2024+0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity40.9%1822+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,315———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents024·11·-0.8
Owner-occupied housing units1,095———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,770———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return288·90·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,506———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$30,7824234-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$48,2412027-0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$162,090k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,360———BEA Regional Accounts
Population3,347———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,732———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,613———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,409———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over806———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line560———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain483———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,320———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined3,286———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago3,003———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher442———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census3,379———
Poverty rate16.9%3330+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.7%6240-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6302419+0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,880———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,960———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,852———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,630———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,481———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,639———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,527———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays2,7663449+0.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,29384·91·+0.2
Private job growth-4.6512·4·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs472———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02745486+0.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.8%39·43·-0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents28.810·9·-1.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.390·91·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200479.196·93·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20087892·93·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201282.394·94·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201686.392·93·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202086.994·95·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20248688·92·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202410.852·56·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%14·5·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit19.3%66·69·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.3%62·71·+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%32·9·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.4%68·32·+0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability4.3%3628+0.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.9%46·82·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic uncertain2.49%43·82·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced14.8%80·88·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.78%43·45·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.1%64·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.5%28·17·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.8%52·59·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic8.04%98·97·+2.9Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic82.7%58·54·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.98%50·73·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.3%2731-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37%3855+0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.6972·87·+0.6
Stroke3.5%2425+0.4CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.7%88·73·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,350———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken4,598———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off11.5%2122+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population3,370———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.032286-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed44———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.4%5251-0.3BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate33.3%78·93·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units656———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.7%4232-0.2CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50565———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,301———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain12,1094628-0.1County Health Rankings

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.