placestats

Cottonwood County, MN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,458
Density6.9people per km² of land
Median household income$68,239
Land area1658km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Cottonwood County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Sanpete County, UT, Lea County, NM, Beltrami County, MN, Stevens County, WA, Buffalo County, WI, Bosque County, TX, Redwood County, MN, Shelby County, IA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Cottonwood Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Private job growth-9.920th pct by value1st pct by value -4.7 sd
Share Asian, not Hispanic3.41%100th pct by value87th pct by value +4.0 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation9.11%100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.9 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%96th pct94th pct -2.7 sd
Business closing rate3.932nd pct by value3rd pct by value -2.2 sd
Business opening rate4.592nd pct by value3rd pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5156690+0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.7%2046+0.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work75,355 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%9694-2.7County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.9%4260+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability29.5%4466-0.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.766·46·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.2%9090-1.4CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1827482+0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19.7%5822-0.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.4
Black-white residential segregation60.9—75·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate3.932·3·-2.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments306———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate4.592·3·-1.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%8253-0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents7.2124·46·-0.8
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.3%4468-0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.214%75·43·+0.6County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,442———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,442———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.2%2822-0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.9%7273-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.3%4864-0.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening62.3%8887+1.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people30.478·73·+1.0
Coronary heart disease5.8%3052+0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma10%8078-0.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.7%3042+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year60.7%2460-0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.460·41·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Depression25.1%3437+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%2659+0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.35740·62·-0.1
Economic connectedness0.8663263-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8363254-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.91938·56·-0.5
Education score0.42667·71·+0.5
Effective property tax rate1.1358·71·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,919———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents27.388·66·+1.2
Fair or poor self-rated health18.6%3462+0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.26679-0.5County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.33%1622-1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.6%2351+0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population679———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.1%8277-0.7CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.5%5872-0.4CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06933246+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11736·54·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4186880-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$828,190k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.23946·68·-0.1
Hearing disability6.9%3248+0.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.1%5275-0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.8%5679-0.3CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.93%7179+0.6County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate76.1%44·60·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.2%2859+0.3CDC PLACES
Housing units5,163———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate56833·16·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$3,03258·53·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.2%4461+0.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths95.34453+0.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,49839·30·-0.5
Jail population rate21539·18·-0.5
Labour force6,209———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.1%843+0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.2%5356-0.0CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0372424-0.8Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy78.3 years6681+0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.7%7079-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents26.878·95·+0.8
Mammography in the past two years77.2%8082+0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.53138·67·-0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$69,5303654-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,43234·32·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$46,40110·28·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work16 min9293-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age41.3 years38·48·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$76530·30·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$154,00042·40·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$68,239—63—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$63,8982253-0.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,73748·58·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0477%417-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations20.37694+0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.9%5068-0.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99550·57·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.65656·45·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.30258·55·+0.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.6%1841+0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity39.8%3033+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,659———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents014·11·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,544———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,610———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·46·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,594———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,1053252-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$59,6045866-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$680,490k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,417———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,319———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,067———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over8,460———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over7,746———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,585———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,594———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,244———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,220———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,107———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,196———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,772———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,517———
Poverty rate14.2%2045+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.2%5069-0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3556482-0.5County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20006,181———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,369———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,036———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,862———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20165,721———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,107———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,988———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population57.1%40·41·-0.3
Preventable hospital stays1,7616886-0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate35343·20·-0.4
Private job growth-9.920·1·-4.7BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs4,394———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02617883+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.6%65·41·+0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents61.364·78·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200057.450·45·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200456.640·36·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200853.442·36·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201257.750·39·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201668.736·46·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202069.442·50·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202470.936·49·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202413.554·66·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.68%24·39·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.4%66·37·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains21.4%56·80·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation9.11%100·99·+2.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.7%26·19·-0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%2653+0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.6%68·75·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic3.41%100·87·+4.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic1.75%68·32·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.5%84·61·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born5.93%79·68·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race10.5%78·70·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89%68·61·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share never married26.1%56·37·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.4%38·63·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.59%9·6·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.11%54·19·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic81.5%22·51·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.01%51·52·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.9%5856-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.5%5280-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.74168·89·+0.5
Stroke3.1%2250+0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.7%30·26·+0.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,600———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,233———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.7%4067-0.0CDC PLACES
Total population11,458———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed290———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4.7%1015+1.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate9.76%25·26·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units504———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%2454+0.3CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,141———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,719———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost6,9766685-0.6County Health Rankings

3of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.