placestats

Shelby County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population11,757
Density7.7people per km² of land
Median household income$67,690
Land area1530km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Shelby County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Lucas County, IA, Howard County, IA, Stevens County, WA, Lewis County, NY, Beltrami County, MN, Sanpete County, UT, Dickinson County, KS, Buffalo County, WI. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Shelby Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Business closing rate4.652nd pct by value3rd pct by value -2.3 sd
Economic connectedness in high school1.0792nd pct87th pct +1.8 sd
Catholic adherents30.794th pct by value93rd pct by value +1.6 sd
Average test score0.28498th pct93rd pct +1.5 sd
Poverty rate8.53%94th pct86th pct -1.5 sd
Returns reporting capital gains25.7%94th pct by value91st pct by value +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5358293+1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.5%9089-0.9CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work93,365 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.5%106+1.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14.4%4056+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability27.5%8482-1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.1956·35·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.8%4458+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score0.2849893+1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking23.2%62+1.4CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents080·45·-0.4
Business closing rate4.652·3·-2.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments367———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened20———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate5.4712·5·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1619+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents30.794·93·+1.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain10.1%9289-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.133%20·7·-0.8County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,584———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,584———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.2%7038+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6%7071-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.2%9078-1.1CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening57.4%4448-0.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people30.688·73·+1.2
Coronary heart disease5.4%8273-1.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%5469-0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.9%4652+0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year66.4%8687+1.0CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.5114·17·-0.9IRS county migration flows
Depression21.6%8275-1.0CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%8078-0.8CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.75492·82·+1.2
Economic connectedness1.048088+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school1.079287+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.3484·76·+0.9
Education score0.94798·93·+1.4
Effective property tax rate1.2665·78·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,032———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents16.664·43·-0.0
Fair or poor self-rated health17.1%7675-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.14461-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.52%8887+1.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity11.9%9785-1.0CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress17.7%6267-0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.2%8078-0.9CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.0385670-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12568·72·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4442252+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,045,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.474·77·+0.6
Hearing disability6.6%6262-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.8%6878-0.4CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.5%4272+0.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.962%8792+1.1County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate75.8%40·58·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity9.9%9588-0.9CDC PLACES
Housing units5,429———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate3729·6·-1.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-7,87510·10·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.3%9282-1.4CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain58.79695-1.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,68244·37·-0.3
Jail population rate18628·14·-0.3
Labour force6,196———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation6.9%9586-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.3%3043+0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.03898489+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy78.3 years7282+0.7County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0853—34·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$663k———Census local government finances
Loneliness32.6%3869-0.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents14.656·84·-0.1
Mammography in the past two years74.7%5061+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.86388·85·+1.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$82,9858478+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,02712·24·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$54,90252·58·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work18.3 min8287-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.1 years76·78·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$81046·42·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$156,20038·41·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$67,690—62—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$68,6956866+0.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,97656·66·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0662%3440-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations16.36685+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.9%9482-1.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99780·73·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.82160·49·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.6876·68·+0.6IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.4%6867-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity38.1%5450+0.1CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,983———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0120·14·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units3,776———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,820———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return248·58·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,850———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$38,8058675+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,6468680+0.7BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$787,960k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,823———BEA Regional Accounts
Population11,806———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over9,606———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,133———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,254———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,727———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line984———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,018———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,531———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined11,568———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,656———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,925———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census11,746———
Poverty rate8.53%9486-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)8.8%9688-1.3Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3576681-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20006,009———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20046,670———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20086,453———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20126,483———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,370———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20206,795———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20246,543———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population76.9%64·69·+0.4
Preventable hospital stays3,4741023+1.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1866·5·-1.1
Private job growth-0.49424·21·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs4,428———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02417478+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10%32·28·-0.6CDC PLACES
Religious adherents61.970·79·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200062.658·63·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200464.458·60·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200854.946·40·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201261.356·48·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201672.454·56·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202070.650·53·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202471.844·51·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.138·48·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.92%76·63·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit10.9%20·19·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains25.7%94·91·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.78%30·50·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%84·46·+0.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%9682-1.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.2%74·78·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%0·14·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced8.73%8·10·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.74%32·36·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.6%94·80·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%80·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22.2%14·11·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married60.1%92·92·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.22%64·48·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.1%84·81·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.95%88·87·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23.3%6457+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours32.1%7688-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.61570·84·+0.5
Stroke2.8%8076-1.1CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.3%72·50·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,610———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken16,788———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off6.7%9284-0.9CDC PLACES
Total population11,757———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.008325840-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed164———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.6%8283-0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain8.22%11·18·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain446———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.9%9685-1.1CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,246———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,104———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost6,8158286-0.8County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.