placestats

Buffalo County, WI

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population13,341
Density7.6people per km² of land
Median household income$68,722
Land area1750km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Buffalo County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Lewis County, NY, Bosque County, TX, Lucas County, IA, Chippewa County, MN, Colorado County, TX, Shelby County, IA, Pine County, MN, Cottonwood County, MN. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Buffalo Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net business formation rate4.0498th pct by value90th pct by value +2.0 sd
Life expectancy81.7 years96th pct98th pct +2.0 sd
Premature mortality25496th pct97th pct -1.6 sd
Median property tax bill2,81192nd pct by value84th pct by value +1.6 sd
Lacking social and emotional support20.5%95th pct91st pct -1.5 sd
Years of potential life lost5,03396th pct97th pct -1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5136889+0.5Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.4%7077-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work152,600 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.4%2518+0.5County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.9%7481-0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability29.1%5469-0.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.5334·21·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.2%6068-0.1CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1837782+0.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.9%248+0.7CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain4819·28·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents078·45·-0.4
Business closing rate8.0742·39·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments278———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened33———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.186·86·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%7653-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents13.448·67·-0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.2%7680-0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.175%51·21·-0.2County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,553———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,553———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.9%7850+0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6%6471-0.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.3%8277-0.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening63.1%9490+1.4CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people22.550·53·-0.1
Coronary heart disease5.5%5868-0.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%1639+0.9CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.4%5659-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year68%9492+1.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.0644·31·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Depression25.4%2434+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.4%6476-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.61662·75·+0.6
Economic connectedness1.119494+1.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8343454-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.0240·62·-0.2
Education score0.87494·91·+1.3
Effective property tax rate1.4284·84·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed6,856———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.428·30·-0.5
Fair or poor self-rated health17%6676-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.53051+0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%3644-0.2County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.3%7781-0.7CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population192———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.4%7873-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.7%4868-0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01778483-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12566·71·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.3949294-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$728,330k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.5180·83·+0.8
Hearing disability6.3%9274-1.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29%7286-0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.3%6484-0.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.935%7981+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate78.3%60·73·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.1%7785-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units6,546———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate56132·16·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,01740·43·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%5066-0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain63.88892-1.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,35334·25·-0.5
Jail population rate17926·13·-0.2
Labour force7,108———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7%8584-0.9CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.5%9591-1.5CDC PLACES
Life expectancy81.7 years9698+2.0County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.7%6779-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents2570·95·+0.7
Mammography in the past two years79.3%9694+1.2CDC PLACES
Material security score1.0198·91·+1.4
Mean adjusted gross income per return$66,6191444-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$53,80844·47·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$52,79238·51·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work25.3 min2243+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age46.4 years86·84·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$82250·44·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$197,60060·61·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$68,722—65—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$73,8698877+1.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,81192·84·+1.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0781%5457+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.96833-1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.8%5270-0.2CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99232·39·-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.0498·90·+2.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.53218·21·-0.8IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.5%2042+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity39.4%3437+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units5,692———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents092·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0126·14·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units4,458———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return12,330———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return212·19·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move11,279———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,1645262+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$57,0753859-0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$767,090k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,440———BEA Regional Accounts
Population13,419———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over11,155———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over10,742———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over9,759———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over3,106———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,154———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,359———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,220———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined13,324———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,801———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher2,156———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,317———
Poverty rate8.73%8685-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.2%7277-0.6Census SAIPE
Premature mortality2549697-1.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20006,641———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20047,591———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20087,000———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20127,039———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20166,988———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20207,816———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20248,100———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population55.2%28·38·-0.5
Preventable hospital stays2,3434466+0.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate38249·24·-0.3
Private job growth-1.3912·14·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,905———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01923059-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12.9%80·51·+0.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents50.948·58·-0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200048.410·18·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200446.76·13·-1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200842.54·14·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201248.514·20·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201661.518·32·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202062.818·36·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202465.318·37·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.976·77·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.2%10·28·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit10.8%24·19·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22%64·82·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation3.07%52·75·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.6%68·41·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.2%5872-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.3%78·79·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain0.48%7·8·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.1%68·54·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born1.44%13·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.72%18·22·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.5%60·55·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%84·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married24.8%40·26·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married57%58·80·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain22.1%—21·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic2.33%28·20·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.03%23·16·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.2%92·93·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.1%26·32·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.1%5252-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.3%3675+0.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.3536·72·-0.2
Stroke2.8%6876-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.9%36·27·+0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed6,830———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken19,594———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off5.8%10095-1.4CDC PLACES
Total population13,341———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed252———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.5%3646+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate13%50·42·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units854———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%6479-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,544———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain122———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute6,043———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,0339697-1.5County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.