placestats

Cloud County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population8973
Density4.8people per km² of land
Median household income$57,333
Land area1853km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Cloud County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Gentry County, MO, Lamb County, TX, Rolette County, ND, Benewah County, ID, Burt County, NE, Somerset County, ME, Decatur County, IA, Schuyler County, MO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Cloud Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership organisations29.1100th pct99th pct +3.0 sd
Jail population rate1,77496th pct by value97th pct by value +3.0 sd
Social connection score1.3798th pct by value98th pct by value +2.1 sd
Incarceration rate2,30493rd pct by value93rd pct by value +1.7 sd
Trend in average test score-0.03886th pct4th pct -1.7 sd
Mean income of arriving households$35,6452nd pct by value2nd pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5129489+1.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.1%7467-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work65,750 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.333%5332+0.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over16.4%4643+0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability31.7%6751-0.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.5252·43·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.5%4948+0.0CDC PLACES
Binge drinking17.9%6144-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents076·45·-0.3
Business closing rate6.112·10·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments281———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.922·25·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%2532+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents15.872·73·+0.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain14.8%8266-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.151%15·12·-0.9County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,101———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,101———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.5%5926+0.2CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.9%6546-0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.2%6751-0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.5%3418-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people28.852·69·-0.0
Coronary heart disease5.8%8252-0.8CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%6365-0.4CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.8%5341-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.4%7464+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.8256·54·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression23.1%5158-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10%7464-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.21676·55·+0.8
Economic connectedness0.9497877+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8227551+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.53548·34·-0.1
Education score-0.43726·20·-0.6
Effective property tax rate1.7996·95·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,348———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents8.458·17·-1.1
Fair or poor self-rated health17.9%8868-1.0CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.95365-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.38%6637+0.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.2%8972-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.4%6553-0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.8%8866-1.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.03326274-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1364·80·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4058689-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$560,350k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.15755·41·+0.2
Hearing disability7.2%5334-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.3%3145+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.9%5567-0.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.918%7665+0.7County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.7%42·52·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.8%6463-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units4,490———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2,30493·93·+1.7
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-12,6584·5·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.3%8459-0.9CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain90.85960-0.4County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,67296·84·+0.0
Jail population rate1,77496·97·+3.0
Labour force4,460———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.6%8371-0.8CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.9%5871-0.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0537710-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.4 years3631-0.3County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.00925—17·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$38k———Census local government finances
Loneliness31.3%8384-1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents10.976·75·+0.3
Mammography in the past two years72.6%6041+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.6994·76·+1.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$61,0884027-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$35,6452·2·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$48,30336·35·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work16.7 min9291-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age39.4 years24·30·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$68939·15·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$96,30010·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,333—33—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$60,4037443+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,72262·57·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0551%1825-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations29.110099+3.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.9%7453-0.7CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain22.55932-0.4County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99648·72·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.7966·68·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.29140·28·-0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.4%5542-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity42.1%1214+0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,670———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents2.7272·67·+0.1
Owner-occupied housing units2,741———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,410———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·46·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,861———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,3253026-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,2115246+0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$470,860k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,849———BEA Regional Accounts
Population8,854———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,187———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,762———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over5,946———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,885———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain863———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,011———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,497———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined8,355———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago7,810———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,332———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,032———
Poverty rate uncertain10.2%9275-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.1%7861-0.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5583433+0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,503———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,503———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,451———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,058———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,930———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,263———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,047———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population29.9%19·12·-1.1
Preventable hospital stays2,9892839+0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate53051·42·-0.3
Private job growth-0.37435·22·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,398———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02637084+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.2%3·13·-1.4CDC PLACES
Religious adherents37.930·27·-0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20006972·80·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200472.776·83·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200871.784·83·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201275.278·83·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201679.364·78·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202077.958·73·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202480.862·77·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.852·60·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.3%46·30·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.3%40·50·-0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains22%94·82·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.767%2·13·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.9%51·36·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.5%8057-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21%36·64·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.2%66·71·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.7%52·35·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago87%30·37·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.7%52·33·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married53.3%50·56·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.78%69·65·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic89.6%58·71·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.82%46·69·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.4%8254+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.8%6064-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score1.3798·98·+2.1
Stroke3%8258-0.8CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.3%82·67·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,910———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken11,534———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9%5048-0.2CDC PLACES
Total population8,973———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.038864-1.7Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed112———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.5%8686-1.0BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18.3%46·64·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units820———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.4%8468-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,732———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,931———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,2526047-0.3County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.