placestats

Lamb County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population12,919
Density4.9people per km² of land
Median household income$56,997
Land area2632km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Lamb County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Cloud County, KS, Benewah County, ID, Gentry County, MO, Rolette County, ND, Burt County, NE, Somerset County, ME, Schuyler County, MO, Decatur County, IA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Lamb Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share divorced6.41%0th pct by value1st pct by value -3.3 sd
Adults under 65 without health insurance28.3%8th pct1st pct +2.3 sd
Colorectal cancer screening45.4%0th pct1st pct -2.2 sd
Share separated4.22%96th pct by value98th pct by value +2.2 sd
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race57.6%94th pct by value95th pct by value +2.0 sd
Cancer other than skin cancer5.6%92nd pct95th pct -1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4182049-0.7Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance28.3%81+2.3CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work89,295 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths uncertain0.381%3322+0.4County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over17.6%3635+0.3CDC PLACES
Any disability37%2021+0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.9832·30·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis22.3%8680-1.1CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.2074327-0.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking16.9%7861-0.8CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain84.575·90·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents1.1792·66·+0.3
Black-white residential segregation18.9—4·—County Health Rankings
Business closing rate5.948·8·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments220———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed13———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened15———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.858·13·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.6%9295-1.9CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents25.292·88·+0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain25.2%2020+0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.307%79·79·+0.7County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,935———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,935———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.9%6932+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.7%7152-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.5%2924+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening45.4%01-2.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people31.464·75·+0.3
Coronary heart disease6.3%2930+0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.6%8089-1.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.6%8456-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year45.3%86-1.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.7382·75·+0.7IRS county migration flows
Depression22.1%7469-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes14.3%129+1.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.8716·17·-1.1
Economic connectedness0.6591819-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7034129-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.53846·34·-0.2
Education score0.14468·53·+0.5
Effective property tax rate1.1946·75·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,630———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents40.388·84·+1.3
Fair or poor self-rated health28.3%86+1.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.17681-0.6County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.28%2011-0.8County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population1,501———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.6%5348-0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress15.8%816+1.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.1052420+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11940·60·-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4277271-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$1,054,400k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.50516·22·-0.8
Hearing disability7.4%4328-0.2CDC PLACES
High blood pressure34.1%1838+0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol33.3%1232+1.1CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.937%9082+1.0County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate72%24·39·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing units5,893———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration of children raised poor here uncertain0.0297—31—Opportunity Atlas
Incarceration rate1,90782·88·+0.9
Income gap between arrivals and departures$2,06158·48·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.2%1624+0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths877165-0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate8748·10·-0.3
Jail population rate51869·63·-0.0
Labour force5,841———BLS LAUS
Life expectancy72.2 years1420-0.7County Health Rankings
Mainline Protestant adherents7.5958·59·-0.1
Mammography in the past two years70.6%5026-0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score-0.081536·33·-0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$58,8261821-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,74920·17·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,6888·15·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work16.4 min9692-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age36.6 years18·14·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$90078·60·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$76,6000·2·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$56,997—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$57,1134833-0.2Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill91310·22·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0493%1219-1.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations18.99092+1.2County Health Rankings
Mobility disability16.9%1414+1.3CDC PLACES
Mobility score-0.243—43·—
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain25.34324-0.1County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99884·86·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate0.91354·50·-0.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.756·4·-1.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity34.9%128+1.5CDC PLACES
Obesity40.4%3926+0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,644———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents1.138·34·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units3,346———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return10,600———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return288·93·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move9,346———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$26,9931816-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$63,6239275+1.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$812,340k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,768———BEA Regional Accounts
Population12,711———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over10,013———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over9,252———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over8,091———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,184———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,023———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,291———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,686———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined12,519———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago11,423———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,153———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census13,045———
Poverty rate15.9%3035+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)18.3%2021+0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality6371218+0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,598———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,271———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,525———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,091———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,995———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,410———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,151———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population83.7%70·80·+0.8
Preventable hospital stays1,9706680-0.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,38989·94·+1.4
Private job growth-3.626·6·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,959———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0184052-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Religious adherents75.494·92·+1.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.698·91·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200479.996·94·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200874.388·88·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201275.480·84·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201680.170·80·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.768·82·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.676·83·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20246.9928·40·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.96%34·22·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit24.4%88·86·+1.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.63%16·17·-1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.38%22·35·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.4%29·17·-0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability5.1%1012+1.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over16.9%18·25·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain2.73%64·41·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced6.41%0·1·-3.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born11.6%91·89·+1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race57.6%94·95·+2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago88.4%48·54·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share never married31.2%82·67·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.9%48·53·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.73%10·8·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain4.22%96·98·+2.2Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic36.8%12·7·-1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.44%86·91·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher14.3%811-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.5%1831+0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.32964·71·+0.3
Stroke3.5%1425+0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.9%43·43·+0.2CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed5,090———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken20,854———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population12,919———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed211———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.6%4643-0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate21.2%56·74·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,249———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.1%106+1.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,744———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain232———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute5,429———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost12,0622929+0.2County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.