placestats

Decatur County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7669
Density5.6people per km² of land
Median household income$57,146
Land area1378km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Decatur County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Wilson County, KS, Burt County, NE, Rolette County, ND, Ashland County, WI, Coosa County, AL, Lamb County, TX, Uvalde County, TX, Gentry County, MO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Decatur Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Departures per 100 people staying8.68100th pct by value93rd pct by value +3.3 sd
Business closing rate2.122nd pct by value2nd pct by value -2.8 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.510th pct by value2nd pct by value -2.5 sd
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%92nd pct94th pct -2.0 sd
Friending bias-0.0294100th pct97th pct -1.9 sd
Share in the same house a year ago82.3%6th pct by value8th pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4727479+0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.5%9076-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work73,375 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%9294-2.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over10.6%9283-1.5CDC PLACES
Any disability29.5%8466-1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.1772·55·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis25.2%3939+0.3CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.08676346+0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.4%1411+1.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain70.270·80·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents072·45·-0.4
Business closing rate2.122·2·-2.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments146———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.4844·35·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%2732+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents3.6616·31·-0.7
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain25.7%2018+0.7Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.104%6·2·-1.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,222———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,222———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.8%3917-0.4CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.3%4937+0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.8%8057-0.8CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60.3%8873+1.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people43.294·91·+1.5
Coronary heart disease6.1%5138-0.2CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%6560-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking18%3528+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year62.6%9070+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying8.68100·93·+3.3IRS county migration flows
Depression22.4%6965-0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.6%4152-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.21680·55·+0.8
Economic connectedness0.9789481+1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7977746+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.20412·18·-1.1
Effective property tax rate1.792·93·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,598———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents19.956·51·-0.1
Fair or poor self-rated health19.7%6751-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.14961-0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.4%7844+0.6County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.1%5755-0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain146———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.6%5948-0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.7%7449-0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.029410097-1.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12240·66·-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4356263-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$268,270k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.09186·59·+1.0
Hearing disability7.2%5134-0.4CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.6%6560-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.1%5365-0.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate68%8·23·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.6%7066-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units3,651———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate60422·19·-0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-10,3714·6·-1.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.6%7852-0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain79.88275-0.9County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate91.70·1·-0.4
Jail population rate17316·12·-0.8
Labour force3,705———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.4%5755-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24%4647-0.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76 years7459+0.7County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0669—32·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$234k———Census local government finances
Loneliness34.1%3247+0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents5.7942·45·-0.3
Mammography in the past two years73.4%6849+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.061638·40·+0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$59,5082823-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$34,6972·2·-1.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,06724·23·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.9 min4860-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age36.2 years12·12·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$66320·11·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$109,50026·14·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,146—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,4092424-0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,85674·62·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.152%9296+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations7.812024-0.9County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.8%7455-0.7CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99530·57·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate6.3698·96·+1.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.510·2·-2.5IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.8%6347-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity41.7%1416+0.7CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,049———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents1.4452·42·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,073———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return6,040———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return272·77·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,266———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$27,5082218-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$44,042812-1.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$342,690k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,781———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,665———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over6,240———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,875———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,769———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,599———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,067———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,309———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,015———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined7,153———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,310———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,157———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,645———
Poverty rate15.2%4439+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)18.3%2221+0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4547456-0.6County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,709———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,011———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,102———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,833———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,734———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,804———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,754———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population87.5%75·84·+0.9
Preventable hospital stays1,9876279-0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate43141·30·-0.5
Private job growth1.4769·46·-0.0BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,859———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01542434-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps13.9%49·58·-0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents30.812·13·-0.9
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200053.224·31·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200452.926·25·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200850.432·29·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201252.128·26·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201665.736·40·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20207042·52·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202473.948·57·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202420.782·87·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.65%24·14·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.2%58·61·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.2%58·60·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.64%58·70·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.1%51·37·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.7%6548-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over20.9%30·62·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain1.63%54·30·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.2%18·39·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.9%44·24·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race3.26%52·29·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago82.3%6·8·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share never married27.6%62·47·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married54.3%62·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.87%47·37·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.54%44·41·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90.9%58·77·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed6.89%24·49·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher24.3%9061+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.2%7876-0.9CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.054544·53·-0.1
Stroke3.2%5142-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.3%82·67·+0.6CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,030———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,150———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.3%6258-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population7,669———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed107———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%7872-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate16.5%32·57·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units602———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%6554-0.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,653———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain116———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,209———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost9,2586959-0.6County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.