placestats

Gentry County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6224
Density4.9people per km² of land
Median household income$57,458
Land area1273km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Gentry County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Cloud County, KS, Lamb County, TX, Rolette County, ND, Burt County, NE, Benewah County, ID, Decatur County, IA, Somerset County, ME, Schuyler County, MO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Gentry Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Evangelical Protestant adherents50.498th pct by value93rd pct by value +2.2 sd
Religious adherents7392nd pct by value91st pct by value +1.8 sd
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.996th pct by value90th pct by value +1.6 sd
Cognitive disability20%2nd pct12th pct +1.5 sd
Children in single-parent households0.0989%4th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.4 sd
Share divorced9.7%6th pct by value18th pct by value -1.4 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5099288+1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.1%5153-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work55,515 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over21%819+1.3CDC PLACES
Any disability37.7%1817+1.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.7526·25·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.2%2227+0.9CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1329074+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.6%6749-0.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain88.379·92·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents074·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.3864·69·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments172———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened19———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate11.176·77·+0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.4%1019+0.8CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents4.8734·36·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain19.6%5441-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.0989%4·2·-1.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,030———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,030———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.5%2514-0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8.4%818+1.4CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability20%212+1.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54.1%4021-0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people40.684·88·+1.0
Coronary heart disease6.2%3534+0.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.9%3539+0.1CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking19.5%1016+0.9CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year54%3628-0.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.488·17·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression26.2%1426+0.9CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.6%4352-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.57529·25·-0.6
Economic connectedness0.989281+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.5831114-1.3Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.40322·27·-0.6
Effective property tax rate1.0340·65·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,844———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents50.498·93·+2.2
Fair or poor self-rated health21.8%3336+0.1CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.43553+0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.46%9267+1.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.5%4652-0.3CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain96———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress19.8%1026+0.9CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.9%3128+0.5CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.01418484-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13470·84·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4493846+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$294,620k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.06469·47·+0.5
Hearing disability8%1613+0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.5%2742+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.4%2946+0.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate74.8%46·53·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity13.1%3847-0.1CDC PLACES
Housing units2,928———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,25742·45·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability10.2%1624+0.7CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain817673-0.8County Health Rankings
Labour force2,928———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation9.2%3841-0.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.4%9291-1.1CDC PLACES
Life expectancy74.5 years5642+0.1County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.00423—11·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$13k———Census local government finances
Loneliness32.7%5767-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents14.382·84·+0.9
Mammography in the past two years68.2%2213-0.8CDC PLACES
Material security score0.10944·42·+0.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$57,2581417-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,37522·22·-0.7IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,11928·24·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work22.1 min4866-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age40.5 years28·40·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$6208·7·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$123,00040·23·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,458—33—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$54,6102425-0.7Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,26830·38·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0696%3645-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations17.67689+0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability15.4%2727+0.6CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99756·73·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.7662·67·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.27464·53·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity31.4%2020+0.7CDC PLACES
Obesity40.9%3122+0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,402———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents3.4380·76·+0.3
Owner-occupied housing units1,797———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,780———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return274·82·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,111———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$29,9843230-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,0634846-0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$334,880k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,311———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,287———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,930———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,635———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,219———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,166———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line948———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line897———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,094———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,186———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,641———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher864———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,162———
Poverty rate15.6%4037+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)14.5%4642-0.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4786450-0.4County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,105———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,312———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,292———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,999———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,043———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,237———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,292———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Preventable hospital stays1,3819294-1.1County Health Rankings
Prison population rate50949·40·-0.3
Private job growth0.75147·35·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,609———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01672843-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps12.9%46·51·-0.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents7392·91·+1.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200058.238·48·-0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200463.546·57·+0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200861.450·59·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20126856·66·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201679.264·77·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202080.874·82·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202481.166·78·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202422.996·90·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.74%26·16·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit17.1%58·60·-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains18.8%70·69·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation1.39%26·36·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75%71·45·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.9%4540-0.2CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over18.7%22·40·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%10·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced9.7%6·18·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.54%22·17·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.8%17·8·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.6%76·80·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%87·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married27.4%58·45·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.6%78·71·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain1.59%7·6·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic94.9%96·96·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.34%32·59·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher20.5%6244+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours39.2%3234+0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.58670·83·+0.7
Stroke3.3%3335-0.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%59·54·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,870———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken10,052———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.7%3538+0.2CDC PLACES
Total population6,224———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed84———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%7072-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate18%44·63·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units526———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability5.2%4943-0.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,303———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain115———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,511———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain9,0537562-0.6County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.