placestats

Cheyenne County, NE

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9478
Density3.1people per km² of land
Median household income$57,594
Land area3098km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Cheyenne County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Keith County, NE, Mitchell County, KS, Prowers County, CO, Morris County, KS, Refugio County, TX, Schoolcraft County, MI, Putnam County, MO, Iron County, WI. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Cheyenne Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Children in single-parent households0.0827%0th pct by value1st pct by value -2.4 sd
Depression18.4%96th pct95th pct -2.0 sd
Frequent mental distress15.8%94th pct91st pct -2.0 sd
Cognitive disability13.6%96th pct86th pct -1.9 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200079.298th pct by value95th pct by value +1.7 sd
Frequent physical distress12.2%92nd pct78th pct -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5018486+1.0Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance10.2%5452-0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work65,235 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.583%134+1.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.6%8477-1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability28.3%9275-1.5CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying6.0470·53·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.9%9484-1.5CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1928483+1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking21.6%1610+1.4CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain91.8—94·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.2
Business closing rate6.148·10·-1.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments263———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed16———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened21———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate8.0634·28·-0.4Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.2%4444+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents15.866·73·+0.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain16.1%7459-0.8Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.0827%0·1·-2.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,052———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,052———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening80.5%2014-0.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.3%8462-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability13.6%9686-1.9CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55.5%6632+0.2CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people34.966·81·+0.2
Coronary heart disease5.7%8257-1.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.5%9291-1.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking15.6%7456-0.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year61.2%6862+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.7962·53·+0.1IRS county migration flows
Depression18.4%9695-2.0CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.9%7066-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.53192·70·+1.4
Economic connectedness0.9868282+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.9558374+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.72266·44·+0.3
Education score1.0392·95·+1.5
Effective property tax rate1.7490·94·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed4,517———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents9.0316·19·-0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health16.6%9680-1.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.77888-0.7County Health Rankings
Firearm share of suicides, standardised120—63·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Firearm suicide rate21.5—94·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%4615-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.9%7865-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress15.8%9491-2.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.2%9278-1.6CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.04724463+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.1076·35·-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4513845+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$676,710k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.13682·61·+1.0
Hearing disability7.2%6034-0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.8%7268-0.7CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.3%9294-1.5CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.93%8079+0.8County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate66.9%10·20·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity10.7%8677-1.1CDC PLACES
Housing units4,886———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate65117·21·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$1,40342·45·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.6%9274-1.6CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1014943-0.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate2,14753·53·-0.2
Jail population rate19421·15·-0.9
Labour force4,624———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.5%7874-1.1CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.6%6177-0.6CDC PLACES
Learning rate0.05379196+1.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy75.2 years5049+0.1County Health Rankings
Loneliness31.1%8387-1.0CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents16.176·87·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years71.9%5235+0.2CDC PLACES
Material security score0.49179·64·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$63,8375636-0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$46,76028·23·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$45,35734·25·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work15.5 min8495-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median age42 years36·55·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$91282·62·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$129,10054·27·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$57,594—33—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$60,1778042+0.6Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,24896·73·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0898%4471-0.3Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations10.53848-0.5County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.7%8871-1.3CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99314·49·-0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.9276·69·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.2558·52·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.9%4839-0.1CDC PLACES
Obesity34.8%8277-0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,351———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents4.2786·82·+0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,912———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,440———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return238·40·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,593———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$34,9467056+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$53,8434449-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$514,150k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,549———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,541———County Health Rankings
Population (firearm measures)8,974———CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Population aged 15 and over7,689———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,351———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,681———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,025———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,031———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,160———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,295———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,431———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,205———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,476———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,468———
Poverty rate11.1%8568-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)12.3%7060-0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4924847-0.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,186———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,746———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,839———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,649———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,711———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,765———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20244,530———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population72.7%67·62·+0.5
Preventable hospital stays1,1769296-1.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate47530·35·-0.3
Private job growth-1.6914·12·-0.6BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs3,077———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02093667-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.3%25·31·-0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents45.140·44·-0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200079.298·95·+1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200480.994·95·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200875.380·90·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201276.170·85·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201683.878·89·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.762·84·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202482.466·82·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20243.2618·29·-1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.22%46·28·-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.6%28·39·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains20%72·74·+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0.667%22·11·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.3%44·24·-0.3CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.4%7662-1.1CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21.4%38·66·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic uncertain2.07%41·35·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.4%44·59·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race8.34%56·64·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.6%32·32·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married22%16·10·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.8%72·78·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of suicides by firearm66.7%—69·—CDC WONDER mortality; RAND firearm ownership database
Share White, not Hispanic87.4%62·64·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.77%66·85·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher22.1%6652+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.4%6867-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.45558·78·+0.2
Stroke3%7858-1.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%90·70·+0.8CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,500———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken14,768———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.6%8168-1.1CDC PLACES
Total population9,478———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed107———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.3%9091-0.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate10.9%8·32·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units535———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.5%7864-1.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,862———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain171———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,214———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost10,9054040+0.1County Health Rankings

6of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.