placestats

Putnam County, MO

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population4675
Density3.5people per km² of land
Median household income$56,875
Land area1340km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Putnam County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Mitchell County, TX, Refugio County, TX, Cheyenne County, NE, Sullivan County, MO, Morris County, KS, Clinch County, GA, Mitchell County, KS, Holt County, MO. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Putnam Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Share widowed11.9%100th pct by value99th pct by value +2.3 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.5 sd
Median gross rent$5756th pct by value4th pct by value -1.4 sd
Jail admission rate6950th pct by value7th pct by value -1.4 sd
Evangelical Protestant adherents45.990th pct by value90th pct by value +1.4 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.1910th pct by value9th pct by value -1.3 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4616075+0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.3%7064-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work36,685 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over14%7259-0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability36.5%2823+0.7CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.4220·19·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.8%1220+1.2CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain-0.07186149-0.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.4%3036+0.1CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.2
Business closing rate7.4128·26·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments83———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed6———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.388·87·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.5%211+1.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2.9710·28·-1.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain20.8%4436+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort907———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income907———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.4%4624-0.0CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.7%3430+0.3CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability18.8%2021+0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening55%5228+0.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people34.270·80·+0.5
Coronary heart disease6%5842-0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.6%5651-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.8%4030+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.9%6055+0.6CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.6156·48·-0.0IRS county migration flows
Depression26.2%2626+0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%6259-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-0.27250·35·-0.0
Economic connectedness0.8615662+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.32618·23·-0.7
Education score-0.66210·12·-0.9
Effective property tax rate0.98737·62·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,028———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents45.990·90·+1.4
Fair or poor self-rated health20.2%6847-0.4CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter7.23658+0.1County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%9053+1.0County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.8%7866-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress19.3%3635+0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.2%6040-0.1CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.002199091-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13668·85·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.445457-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$178,900k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.20562·38·+0.1
Hearing disability7.8%2817+0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.1%5246+0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol32.8%2640+0.8CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate81.2%82·87·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.3%6957-0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units2,845———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate82633·35·-0.4
Income gap between arrivals and departures$7,89476·73·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.3%5638-0.1CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain857668-0.8County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6950·7·-1.4
Jail population rate1139·5·-1.1
Labour force2,092———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.6%6752-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support20.3%9493-1.2CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.03792323-1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.4 years2630-0.4County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.1%6475-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.6326·25·-0.9
Mammography in the past two years74.2%7656+0.7CDC PLACES
Material security score0.16961·45·+0.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$54,0911011-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,14034·31·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$41,24510·11·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.7 min5881-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age45.6 years64·81·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$5756·4·-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$111,60028·16·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$56,875—32—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$51,9671619-0.9Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,10122·30·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0836%3664-0.4Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations6.431415-1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability14.1%4839-0.1CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99992·96·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate4.9492·93·+1.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.1910·9·-1.3IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.1%4032+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity35.1%8075-0.9CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,874———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents014·11·-0.8
Owner-occupied housing units1,521———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return3,950———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return262·70·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move3,617———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$33,2086447+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,2122830-0.6BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$228,290k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,639———BEA Regional Accounts
Population4,638———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over3,809———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over3,551———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,406———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,173———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain744———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line700———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,584———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined4,575———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago4,201———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain657———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census4,681———
Poverty rate uncertain16.2%3334+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)15.3%4236-0.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5573433+0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,334———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20042,445———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20082,339———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,309———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,346———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20202,361———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,380———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.5
Preventable hospital stays3,2072630+0.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate71356·61·-0.2
Private job growth-0.225·24·-0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs499———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01762249-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps10.9%28·36·-0.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents52.562·62·+0.1
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200069.266·81·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200468.356·72·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200869.662·79·+0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20127470·81·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.688·90·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202084.692·91·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202485.390·90·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202416.172·75·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.49%16·12·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit15.9%46·53·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.9%74·74·+0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.49%64·67·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year76.5%84·64·+1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%7453-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over25.1%70·87·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%—14·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain12.3%36·58·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.84%33·24·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.9%64·72·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%87·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.7%22·18·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.1%40·48·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic95.3%98·97·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed11.9%100·99·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain19.3%4237-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours38.6%3439+0.6CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.076244·55·-0.4
Stroke3.1%7250-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.2%52·48·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,010———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken6,797———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9%6148-0.4CDC PLACES
Total population4,675———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02541011-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed64———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.1%5464-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate34.1%80·93·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units971———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.8%7054-0.7CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50844———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,860———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain11,6612733+0.2County Health Rankings

11of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.