placestats

Mitchell County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5767
Density3.2people per km² of land
Median household income$58,233
Land area1818km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Mitchell County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Keith County, NE, Refugio County, TX, Cheyenne County, NE, Iron County, WI, Holt County, MO, Essex County, VT, Prowers County, CO, Goliad County, TX. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Mitchell Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Per capita personal income$76,41598th pct90th pct +2.3 sd
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.54%98th pct91st pct +2.3 sd
Returns reporting capital gains27.1%100th pct by value93rd pct by value +2.3 sd
Catholic adherents35.9100th pct by value95th pct by value +2.1 sd
Average test score0.38197th pct97th pct +2.0 sd
Friending bias-0.032498th pct98th pct -1.9 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5139489+1.3Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.9%7870-0.8CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work33,230 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%9394-1.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over11.2%8880-1.3CDC PLACES
Any disability30.6%7458-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.9110·11·-1.1IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.2%5052-0.2CDC PLACES
Average test score0.3819797+2.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.3%3638+0.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.2
Business closing rate5.28·5·-1.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments213———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.6216·11·-0.8Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3032+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents35.9100·95·+2.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain13.6%9672-1.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.211%40·41·-0.3County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort714———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income714———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.8%6031+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.7%6252-0.6CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.8%7657-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening53.9%4220-0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.644·66·-0.3
Coronary heart disease5.8%7652-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.3%6665-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.4%5046-0.4CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year59.6%6054+0.5CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying3.64·4·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Depression22.4%7065-0.6CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.8%7868-0.9CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.34876·61·+1.1
Economic connectedness1.079691+1.6Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7413235-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.1392·67·+1.3
Education score0.58173·79·+0.7
Effective property tax rate1.996·96·+1.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,527———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents9.3524·20·-0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health17.7%8070-1.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.64572-0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.54%9891+2.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity12.6%9278-1.2CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.2%6657-0.3CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.6%8070-1.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.03249898-1.9Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.12656·73·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4553641+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$669,980k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.33494·74·+1.6
Hearing disability7.2%6034-0.6CDC PLACES
High blood pressure31.9%6058-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.3%5062-0.1CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate70%20·30·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.1%7872-1.0CDC PLACES
Housing units3,124———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,24464·64·-0.1
Income gap between arrivals and departures$6,86960·70·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8%8266-1.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain88.26363-0.6County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate4,28289·81·+1.1
Jail population rate80085·85·+1.1
Labour force2,595———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.2%8479-1.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.8%6073-0.6CDC PLACES
Life expectancy77.6 years8076+0.8County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0066—14·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$25k———Census local government finances
Loneliness31.3%7684-0.8CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents19.588·91·+1.2
Mammography in the past two years71.7%4233+0.1CDC PLACES
Material security score0.53785·67·+1.1
Mean adjusted gross income per return$68,4577250+0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,35336·32·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$42,48416·14·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work13.6 min10098-1.7Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.3 years46·66·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$65322·10·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$109,60022·14·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$58,233—35—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$60,4868043+0.5Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill2,08482·69·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0685%2044-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations19.28293+1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.4%7260-1.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99752·73·+0.3Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate1.4266·61·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.3158·55·+0.2IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity26.4%6850-0.6CDC PLACES
Obesity39.3%4238+0.3CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,567———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents0.0342·18·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units1,797———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,550———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return250·57·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,160———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,9138867+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$76,4159890+2.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$442,370k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,789———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,719———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,700———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,312———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over3,936———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,312———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain702———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line586———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,628———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,581———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,143———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,001———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,796———
Poverty rate uncertain12.5%7158-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.5%9675-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3599081-0.9County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,266———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,349———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,203———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20122,965———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,942———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,101———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,172———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population100%100·100·+1.6
Preventable hospital stays3,1993131+0.4County Health Rankings
Prison population rate44423·32·-0.4
Private job growth3.3678·72·+0.3BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,214———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03277892+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps7.6%5·10·-1.5CDC PLACES
Religious adherents64.882·83·+0.8
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200075.888·91·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20047988·93·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877.790·93·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201279.988·91·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201682.970·87·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202081.866·85·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202483.268·85·+0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20247.3830·42·-0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions4.17%90·66·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.5%6·23·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains27.1%100·93·+2.3IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%20·9·-1.0IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year73.9%56·36·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%8667-1.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over22.8%54·76·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced12.4%52·60·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.2%50·64·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%89·83·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share never married20%12·4·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married61.7%98·95·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%—11·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%91·53·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain3.5%37·58·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.5%88·90·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain5.87%16·27·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher25.4%9066+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours36.1%5861-0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.9384·93·+1.1
Stroke2.9%8667-1.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.5%86·70·+0.7CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,880———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken8,973———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off8.5%6855-0.6CDC PLACES
Total population5,767———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01114734-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed68———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.6%7683-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate17.8%27·62·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units557———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.2%9076-1.4CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,060———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,437———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain5,73110094-1.2County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.