placestats

Swift County, MN

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population9787
Density5.1people per km² of land
Median household income$62,601
Land area1922km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Swift County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Montezuma County, CO, Monona County, IA, Rio Grande County, CO, Clay County, KS, Marion County, KS, Pocahontas County, IA, Carroll County, MO, Rice County, KS. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Swift Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Mainline Protestant adherents34.9100th pct by value98th pct by value +2.8 sd
Per capita personal income$74,136100th pct88th pct +2.1 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200443.92nd pct by value9th pct by value -1.9 sd
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-15,2512nd pct by value3rd pct by value -1.7 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population20%7th pct by value7th pct by value -1.6 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2012454th pct by value15th pct by value -1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5238691+1.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.7%6058-0.4CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work86,785 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.556%104+1.0County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over9.7%9688-1.5CDC PLACES
Any disability30.2%7161-0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.0542·32·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Arthritis21.3%9289-1.6CDC PLACES
Average test score0.1367475+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.1%3319+0.5CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain98.483·96·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.3
Business closing rate7.9338·36·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments276———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed22———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened19———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.8522·13·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%2932+0.4CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents2182·83·+1.2
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain12.6%9278-1.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.293%83·75·+1.0County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,309———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,309———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.2%4822-0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6%8571-1.1CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.3%7764-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.6%7859+0.8CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people27.452·65·-0.0
Coronary heart disease5.8%6052-0.5CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%5869-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.6%2732+0.5CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63%7872+0.7CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.1732·34·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression26.7%1322+1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.1%5461-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.32867·60·+0.6
Economic connectedness1.019084+1.2Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8786661+0.5Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.2894·74·+1.5
Education score-0.033755·40·+0.1
Effective property tax rate0.85540·52·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Employed5,230———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents12.226·29·-0.7
Fair or poor self-rated health18.3%6764-0.6CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.89186-0.7County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.27%2210-0.9County Health Rankings
Food insecurity14.8%4158-0.1CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain268———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress17.5%7371-0.6CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.4%7974-1.0CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.02636677-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.13584·85·+0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4442252+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$802,860k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.20488·66·+1.1
Hearing disability7%5644-0.5CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%7370-0.6CDC PLACES
High cholesterol29.9%6778-0.6CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.907%5559+0.4County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate74.3%40·50·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12%4461-0.2CDC PLACES
Housing units4,697———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate3110·3·-1.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-15,2512·3·-1.7IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.3%6059-0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain82.57471-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,38523·25·-0.3
Jail population rate86.37·3·-1.1
Labour force5,386———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.9%3146+0.2CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support22.2%5668-0.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0565129-1.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy79 years10087+1.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness32.3%5972-0.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents34.9100·98·+2.8
Mammography in the past two years75.5%8068+0.9CDC PLACES
Material security score0.55464·68·+0.6
Mean adjusted gross income per return$73,7028064+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$44,99510·18·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$60,24592·71·+1.2IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work21.1 min5272-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.4 years58·67·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$90078·60·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$147,10050·36·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$62,601—48—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$69,2458866+1.4Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,25828·37·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0837%4864-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations16.46286+0.3County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.9%7768-0.8CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain28.72817+0.6County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99446·56·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-1.0830·18·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-0.11856·35·-0.0IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.8%6756-0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity39.1%4240+0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units4,134———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents0.0128·14·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units3,072———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return8,560———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return226·39·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move7,600———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$36,5198664+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$74,13610088+2.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$718,080k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,686———BEA Regional Accounts
Population9,719———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,991———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over7,508———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,743———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,298———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,041———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line989———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,609———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined9,419———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago8,485———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,548———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census9,838———
Poverty rate10.8%7870-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)10.5%9075-1.0Census SAIPE
Premature mortality3759477-1.0County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20005,437———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20045,735———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20085,244———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20125,119———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20164,994———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20205,193———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20245,054———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population20%7·7·-1.6
Preventable hospital stays1,4219293-1.3County Health Rankings
Prison population rate2247·8·-1.1
Private job growth2.3762·61·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,847———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.02717285+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.4%50·39·-0.1CDC PLACES
Religious adherents68.194·86·+1.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200046.84·15·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200443.92·9·-1.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200842.94·15·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 2012454·15·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201663.714·36·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20206518·40·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202467.418·42·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202420.586·86·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.19%28·28·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit11.6%8·24·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.9%68·74·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.81%86·91·+1.2IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year71.8%27·20·-0.5CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%5253-0.3CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.5%66·80·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%27·14·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced11.2%44·39·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.74%36·38·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race6.86%54·57·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago86.7%36·33·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married28.2%70·51·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share now married52.6%30·51·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain4.61%81·81·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.73%—51·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic86.7%56·63·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.05%72·74·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher23%7456+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours31.1%9493-1.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.70878·88·+0.7
Stroke3.1%4650-0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57.6%31·38·+0.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed4,570———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken15,634———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.8%5365-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population9,787———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.02432012-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed156———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.9%5672-0.5BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate12%24·36·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units563———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.7%5858-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,779———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain175———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute4,113———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost7,9788474-0.7County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.