placestats

Pocahontas County, IA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population7040
Density4.7people per km² of land
Median household income$63,423
Land area1495km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Pocahontas County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Marion County, KS, Clay County, KS, Monona County, IA, Montezuma County, CO, Rice County, KS, Wasco County, OR, Pratt County, KS, Union County, OR. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Pocahontas Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.210th pct by value1st pct by value -3.1 sd
Mammography in the past two years80.7%100th pct97th pct +2.4 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.882nd pct by value2nd pct by value -1.8 sd
Dental visit in the past year67.9%100th pct92nd pct +1.8 sd
Binge drinking22.4%4th pct6th pct +1.6 sd
Catholic adherents23.390th pct by value86th pct by value +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.549094+1.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance8.5%7676-0.6CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work61,550 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over15.7%3647+0.2CDC PLACES
Any disability28%9078-1.2CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.882·2·-1.8IRS county migration flows
Arthritis23.4%5564-0.3CDC PLACES
Binge drinking22.4%46+1.6CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 50 uncertain49.517·32·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents088·45·-0.3
Business closing rate9.4260·70·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments178———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed17———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate6.6518·11·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%3132+0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents23.390·86·+1.5
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.5%6262-0.5Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.156%24·14·-0.8County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,081———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,081———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.6%6127+0.1CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6.5%5957-0.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability15.1%7467-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening59.2%8264+1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people2428·57·-0.5
Coronary heart disease5.6%7663-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.2%6169-0.5CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking16.7%4742-0.1CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year67.9%10092+1.8CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying6.0976·61·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Depression21.4%8078-0.8CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.8%6568-0.6CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.5586·71·+1.0
Economic connectedness0.9196573+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.8164750+0.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score1.176·66·+0.8
Effective property tax rate1.1462·72·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,476———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents3.732·4·-1.4
Fair or poor self-rated health18.1%6966-0.7CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter75163-0.3County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.35%5427+0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.6%6068-0.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain203———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.1%5959-0.2CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12.7%6768-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06343951+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11636·53·-0.6Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4058889-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$645,000k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score0.19980·66·+0.8
Hearing disability6.7%8457-0.9CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.6%6570-0.5CDC PLACES
High cholesterol30.4%5173-0.2CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.925%8375+0.8County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate78.6%70·75·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11%6973-0.7CDC PLACES
Housing units3,658———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate53323·14·-0.8
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-2,38724·27·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability7.8%8270-1.0CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain73.39683-1.3County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,27218·22·-0.9
Jail population rate14520·8·-1.0
Labour force3,570———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.7%6669-0.6CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support24.9%2336+1.0CDC PLACES
Life expectancy76.4 years6063+0.4County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0941—36·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$449k———Census local government finances
Loneliness34.1%2347+0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents19.774·91·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years80.7%10097+2.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.78386·81·+1.2
Mean adjusted gross income per return$74,8878466+0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$47,71722·27·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$50,10458·42·+0.0IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.9 min7080-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age43.9 years62·71·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$74337·25·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$93,3000·6·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$63,423—50—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$68,6548865+1.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,06618·28·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0561%1626-0.9Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations22.78896+1.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.6%8472-1.0CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99324·46·-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-2.7712·8·-1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-3.210·1·-3.1IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity25.9%5755-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity36.7%8463-0.5CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units3,084———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents094·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents018·11·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units2,424———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return5,980———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return258·60·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move5,418———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$35,9567661+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$60,3856269+0.3BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$424,140k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population7,024———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,976———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,737———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,362———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,879———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,650———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line599———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line762———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,888———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,865———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago6,011———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher910———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census7,078———
Poverty rate8.7%9685-1.4Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.1%7270-0.8Census SAIPE
Premature mortality4594855-0.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,141———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,313———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,011———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20124,032———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,865———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,823———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,600———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population50%39·31·-0.4
Preventable hospital stays1,7217487-0.7County Health Rankings
Prison population rate38831·25·-0.6
Private job growth-9.460·2·-0.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs2,193———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03167691+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps11.4%43·39·-0.2CDC PLACES
Religious adherents46.844·48·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200056.422·41·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200457.326·37·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200854.326·38·-0.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201261.138·48·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201673.746·60·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202075.254·65·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202477.458·67·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20242184·87·+1.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.91%50·44·+0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.3%28·37·-0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains19.7%64·73·+0.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.91%68·73·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year75.1%76·46·+0.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.3%7467-0.8CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over23.4%58·80·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.1%72·69·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain2.88%42·40·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race5.44%56·50·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago85.4%12·22·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Share never married23.3%26·16·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.4%64·76·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.9%45·38·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic90%60·73·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed7.27%52·57·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher18.7%2633-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours33.9%5678-0.4CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.74376·89·+0.5
Stroke2.9%8067-1.0CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication58.5%63·54·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,090———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken7,011———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off7.4%7772-0.7CDC PLACES
Total population7,040———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed94———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.6%7683-0.7BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate15.7%46·54·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units574———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.3%7672-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,253———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year uncertain62———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,096———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain9,3245158-0.2County Health Rankings

9of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.