placestats

Borden County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population723
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$64,250
Land area2324km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Borden County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Wrangell City and Borough, AK, Hinsdale County, CO, Cherry County, NE, Roberts County, TX, Slope County, ND, Jones County, SD, Perkins County, SD, Arthur County, NE. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Borden Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Per capita personal income$163,540100th pct100th pct +6.0 sd
Mean adjusted gross income per return$131,330100th pct98th pct +5.0 sd
Economy score2.6100th pct by value97th pct by value +4.0 sd
Business closing rate36.4100th pct by value100th pct by value +3.9 sd
Business opening rate36.498th pct by value100th pct by value +3.3 sd
Median household income (model-based)$80,738100th pct86th pct +2.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.5114389-0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance12.5%1631+0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work uncertain4,025 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%5594-0.9County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over8.6%8893-1.1CDC PLACES
Any disability28.1%6877-0.5CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.4%9089-1.3CDC PLACES
Average test score0.4089498+1.3Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking20.1%5419+0.0CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate36.4100·100·+3.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments11———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate36.498·100·+3.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7%8060-0.7CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents022·6·-1.1
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain17.9%5450-0.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort103———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening84.7%9480+1.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.5%8082-0.8CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.4%6476-0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening60.4%9874+1.9CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people47.550·94·-0.1
Coronary heart disease5.1%8886-0.9CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.9%7082-0.8CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.8%8886-0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year65.8%8485+0.9CDC PLACES
Depression24.4%3445+0.5CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes9.3%4878-0.1CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.75878·82·+0.7
Economy score2.6100·97·+4.0
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.46811·11·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Employed400———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents43.488·88·+0.8
Fair or poor self-rated health17.3%4473-0.2CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.12281+0.2County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.09%80-1.5County Health Rankings
Frequent mental distress17.8%5466+0.0CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress12%7082-0.6CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.50168+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$943,180k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.354·2·-1.9
Hearing disability6.1%9481-1.1CDC PLACES
High blood pressure30.1%5275-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.9%1054+1.6CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate63.6%10·13·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing units352———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate1,946—89·—
Independent-living disability7.3%7482-0.6CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate4,72680·84·+0.7
Jail population rate82275·85·+0.1
Labour force411———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents012·1·-1.1
Mammography in the past two years77.8%9886+1.6CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$131,33010098+5.0IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work uncertain13.6 min8698-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Median age uncertain30 years2·2·-2.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$105,4009·11·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$64,250—52—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$80,73810086+2.8Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain4932·4·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0585-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability11.3%6077-0.3CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate060·35·-0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity22.5%6081-0.3CDC PLACES
Obesity33%8085-0.6CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units239———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents050·11·-0.5
Owner-occupied housing units152———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return550———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return298·99·+2.2IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move471———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income uncertain$36,0746862+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$163,540100100+6.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$93,218k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population570———BEA Regional Accounts
Population572———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over522———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over455———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over447———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain98———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line68———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined723———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined571———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago644———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain158———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census631———
Poverty rate (model-based)11.9%6463-0.4Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000353———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004359———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008361———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012363———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016365———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020416———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024387———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population51.5%46·33·+0.0
Prison population rate1,130—86·—
Private job growth9.3688·96·+0.9BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs444———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents43.446·40·-0.2
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20008261·97·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200484.678·98·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200888.898·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20129194·100·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201691.476·99·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202096.198·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202496.196·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202414.196·68·+1.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%54·5·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%34·1·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains24%46·88·-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%64·9·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.5%76·25·+0.8CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3%7482-0.6CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over13.6%2·7·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%50·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%90·14·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago89.1%48·63·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain9.2%0·0·-2.0Census ACS 5-year
Share now married uncertain82.6%100·100·+2.8Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women0%82·11·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share separated0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic80.2%22·49·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain35.3%9687+1.9Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.7%3472+0.2CDC PLACES
Stroke2.7%8084-0.7CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication56.2%66·21·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed250———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,652———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population723———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed11———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%6479-0.6BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain32.1%74·92·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain113———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.1%6879-0.5CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50 uncertain159———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute uncertain296———Census ACS 5-year

18of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.