placestats

Roberts County, TX

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population785
Density0.3people per km² of land
Median household income$66,118
Land area2393km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Roberts County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Wrangell City and Borough, AK, Hinsdale County, CO, Arthur County, NE, Borden County, TX, Cheyenne County, CO, Perkins County, SD, Cherry County, NE, Jones County, SD. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Roberts Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Median household income (model-based)$76,63494th pct81st pct +2.0 sd
Share in the same house a year ago96.8%96th pct by value100th pct by value +1.8 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200892.1100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.8 sd
Cholesterol screening85.1%98th pct85th pct +1.7 sd
Homeownership rate85.5%94th pct by value97th pct by value +1.7 sd
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200490.9100th pct by value100th pct by value +1.6 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.68499+0.9Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance11.7%2437+0.5CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work6,280 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.9%4867-0.1CDC PLACES
Any disability27.6%7881-0.6CDC PLACES
Arthritis21.5%8088-1.0CDC PLACES
Binge drinking20.7%4815+0.2CDC PLACES
Births per 1,000 women aged 15 to 500—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Black Protestant adherents096·45·-0.1
Business closing rate20.594·100·+1.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments19———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed4———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened3———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate15.482·97·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.1%7453-0.3CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents022·6·-0.9
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain11.3%9484-1.4Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort126———Opportunity Atlas
Cholesterol screening85.1%9885+1.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease5.3%8487-0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability14.2%6078-0.4CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening56.8%7443+0.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people48.454·94·-0.1
Coronary heart disease4.8%9493-1.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma9.9%6682-0.6CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking12.7%9086-0.8CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year57.4%2843-0.6CDC PLACES
Depression24.6%2243+0.7CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes8.9%6486-0.4CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.92386·89·+0.8
Economy score1.2276·71·+0.5
Effective property tax rate uncertain164·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed357———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents3888·82·+0.9
Fair or poor self-rated health16.2%7284-0.5CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.21879+0.4County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.37%8534+1.0County Health Rankings
Foreign-born population0———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress18.1%4259+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress11.7%7686-0.7CDC PLACES
Gini index of income inequality0.3839298-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$224,260k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.061862·48·+0.4
Hearing disability5.9%9686-1.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure29.6%5880-0.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.5%1659+1.2CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate85.5%94·97·+1.7Census ACS 5-year
Housing units392———Census ACS 5-year
Independent-living disability7%8287-0.7CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,73535·39·-0.5
Jail population rate18418·13·-0.6
Labour force371———BLS LAUS
Mainline Protestant adherents24.190·94·+1.4
Mammography in the past two years71.4%4231-0.0CDC PLACES
Mean adjusted gross income per return$77,9418671+0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Mean travel time to work17.3 min4490-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age39.4 years10·30·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$76943·31·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value uncertain$176,80060·52·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$66,118—58—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$76,6349481+2.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,77689·59·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Membership organisations0585-0.6County Health Rankings
Mobility disability10.7%7485-0.5CDC PLACES
Net business formation rate-5.1316·3·-0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
No leisure-time physical activity21.9%7484-0.5CDC PLACES
Obesity33.8%7082-0.4CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units303———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents096·78·-0.2
Other religion adherents056·11·-0.4
Owner-occupied housing units259———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return760———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return260·64·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move683———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$31,5221437-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$66,8405680-0.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$54,742k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population819———BEA Regional Accounts
Population840———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over577———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over631———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over522———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over uncertain132———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line75———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined778———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined833———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago760———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain115———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census827———
Poverty rate (model-based)9%9487-1.2Census SAIPE
Presidential votes cast, 2000549———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2004507———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2008518———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2012508———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2016554———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2020550———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 2024572———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population63.7%56·49·+0.3
Private job growth-0.81340·18·-0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs122———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Religious adherents6272·79·+0.4
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200086.884·99·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200490.9100·100·+1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200892.1100·100·+1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201293.4100·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201696.3100·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202096.9100·100·+1.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202496.2100·100·+1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.3962·50·+0.4MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions0%56·5·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit0%36·1·-1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains20.5%32·76·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%66·9·-0.6IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year72.2%60·23·+0.6CDC PLACES
Self-care disability2.7%9493-1.0CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over uncertain16.8%10·24·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%50·24·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic0%86·14·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain14.6%90·87·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born0%—1·—Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago96.8%96·100·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%98·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married uncertain15.1%14·0·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share now married63.6%70·97·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%100·53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic86.5%50·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain22%4052-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours37.6%1450+1.2CDC PLACES
Stroke2.6%9090-0.9CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication55.8%56·19·+0.3CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed390———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken1,380———Stanford Education Data Archive
Total population785———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed14———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.8%2636+0.2BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate uncertain22.7%33·78·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units uncertain89———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability3.7%8691-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50161———Census ACS 5-year
Women who gave birth in the past year0———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute364———Census ACS 5-year

12of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.