placestats

Roosevelt County, MT

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population10,665
Density1.8people per km² of land
Median household income$53,125
Land area6098km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Roosevelt County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Sedgwick County, CO, Edwards County, KS, Trinity County, CA, Sanders County, MT, Lincoln County, KS, Huerfano County, CO, Harmon County, OK, Ontonagon County, MI. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Roosevelt Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Premature mortality1,3370th pct0th pct +5.1 sd
Years of potential life lost32,6950th pct0th pct +5.0 sd
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic57.2%100th pct by value99th pct by value +4.8 sd
Life expectancy60.4 years0th pct0th pct -4.5 sd
Health score-1.550th pct by value1st pct by value -3.9 sd
Stroke4.5%0th pct4th pct +3.8 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4423666-0.4Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance13.1%4227-0.2CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work66,350 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.714%112+1.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over22.2%815+1.6CDC PLACES
Any disability41.6%04+2.1CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying3.246·4·-1.4IRS county migration flows
Arthritis27.8%011+2.1CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.68302-2.2Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking18.5%3234+0.2CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents082·45·-0.3
Business closing rate6.6318·15·-0.7Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments184———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed12———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened18———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.9554·60·+0.2Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer6.8%6469+0.0CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents11.350·61·-0.4
Child mortality uncertain114—4—County Health Rankings
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain26.2%3617+0.4Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.302%77·78·+0.5County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort2,166———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income2,166———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening76.1%01-2.6CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease9.2%28+2.5CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21.1%26+2.0CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening49.3%203-1.0CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.148·84·-0.1
Coronary heart disease7.3%06+2.4CDC PLACES
Current asthma14.1%00+3.7CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking23.7%02+3.7CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year46.5%127-1.4CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.2518·12·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Depression26.9%1020+1.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes13.5%1814+1.0CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-1.830·3·-2.4
Economic connectedness0.54546-1.8Social Capital Atlas
Economic connectedness in high school0.7474836-0.0Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.04026·9·-1.6
Education score-1.980·1·-2.2
Effective property tax rate1.2963·79·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed3,580———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents7.4610·14·-0.7
Fair or poor self-rated health28.2%126+1.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter5.37693-0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.3%5215-0.1County Health Rankings
Food insecurity28.1%36+2.5CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain120———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress22.7%03+2.9CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress18.7%01+2.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.13627+2.0Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.163100·97·+2.7Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4662628+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$521,550k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.550·1·-3.9
Hearing disability10.4%01+3.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure35.4%1030+1.3CDC PLACES
High cholesterol28.8%8489-1.3CDC PLACES
High school graduation0.681%—1—County Health Rankings
Homeownership rate68.6%10·24·-1.3Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity20.5%69+2.1CDC PLACES
Housing units4,058———Census ACS 5-year
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-3,29420·23·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability13%03+3.2CDC PLACES
Injury deaths19551+2.2County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,30735·23·-0.4
Jail population rate33531·38·-0.3
Labour force3,728———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation17.4%02+3.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support27.2%917+1.5CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.03324428-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy60.4 years00-4.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness35.3%932+1.3CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents12.166·78·+0.2
Mammography in the past two years65.7%105-1.3CDC PLACES
Material security score-1.392·5·-2.3
Mean adjusted gross income per return$58,8203721-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$49,86546·33·-0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$53,15876·52·+0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19 min6285-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age30.5 years0·2·-2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$70743·17·-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$119,40060·21·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,125—23—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$51,5963818-0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,53576·50·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.0743%3852-0.5Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations4.73169-1.0County Health Rankings
Mobility disability17.8%810+1.5CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain33.8338+0.4County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99878·89·+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate3.3182·85·+0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.0222·11·-0.9IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity29.5%3230+0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity41.3%1219+1.0CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,988———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents10.298·95·+2.7
Owner-occupied housing units2,049———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return7,770———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return294·92·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move6,890———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$21,14344-2.1Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$45,4021017-1.1BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$468,870k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,327———BEA Regional Accounts
Population10,319———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over7,744———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over6,918———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over6,138———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,268———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line3,132———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line2,440———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,236———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined10,041———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago10,026———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher1,219———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census10,794———
Poverty rate30.6%04+3.5Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)24.3%65+1.9Census SAIPE
Premature mortality1,33700+5.1County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20003,813———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,028———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20084,947———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,672———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,652———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20204,017———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,914———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population59.1%46·43·+0.1
Preventable hospital stays2,9882239+0.6County Health Rankings
Private job growth-1.1429·16·-0.2BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,650———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.0124616-1.4Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps22.2%97·90·+1.8CDC PLACES
Religious adherents4130·34·-0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200043.810·10·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200444.54·9·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200836.56·7·-1.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201242.110·12·-1.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201653.510·20·-1.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202051.16·18·-1.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20245510·20·-1.6MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 202411.256·58·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.14%44·26·-0.0IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit25.9%88·89·+1.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains12.6%20·35·-0.8IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation2.67%78·70·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year68.5%14·6·-1.1CDC PLACES
Self-care disability5.6%67+1.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over11.9%0·3·-2.2Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic57.2%100·99·+4.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain0.797%—46·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced6.9%2·2·-1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.13%0·7·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race2.71%17·22·-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago94%100·98·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Share never married51.1%100·99·+3.4Census ACS 5-year
Share now married33.6%2·2·-2.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic6.07%95·92·+1.5Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic32.9%10·6·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed8.41%60·80·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher19.9%5140-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours42.5%09+2.1CDC PLACES
Social connection score-0.76812·11·-1.4
Stroke4.5%04+3.8CDC PLACES
Suicide rate uncertain36.3—2—County Health Rankings
Taking blood pressure medication55.3%32·17·-0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed3,740———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken18,659———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off16.2%35+2.8CDC PLACES
Total population10,665———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.038144-1.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed148———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate4%3830+0.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate26.4%48·84·-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units1,070———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability8.7%84+1.6CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 502,441———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute3,495———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost32,69500+5.0County Health Rankings

8of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.