placestats

Lincoln County, KS

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population2924
Density1.6people per km² of land
Median household income$53,546
Land area1863km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Lincoln County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Keweenaw County, MI, Pondera County, MT, Sedgwick County, CO, Edwards County, KS, Roosevelt County, MT, Gregory County, SD, Harmon County, OK, Sanders County, MT. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Lincoln Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Preventable hospital stays4,9832nd pct4th pct +2.6 sd
Learning rate-0.1060th pct0th pct -2.0 sd
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.494th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.9 sd
Pretrial share of the jail population0%7th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.9 sd
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.886th pct by value2nd pct by value -1.5 sd
Colorectal cancer screening58.4%94th pct57th pct +1.5 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4775481+0.1Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance9.2%8265-0.7CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work26,560 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0%7794-1.3County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over13.6%7862-0.8CDC PLACES
Any disability31.9%7049-0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying2.886·2·-1.5IRS county migration flows
Arthritis24.9%3643+0.5CDC PLACES
Average test score uncertain0.1237973+1.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking17.8%5445-0.3CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents080·45·-0.3
Business closing rate1070·79·+0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments81———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed8———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate12.582·88·+1.0Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.3%1432+0.6CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents7.5530·47·-0.6
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain15.5%9662-1.2Census SAIPE
Children in the mobility cohort518———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income518———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening81.4%5824+0.3CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease7.1%4642+0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.3%7450-0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening58.4%9457+1.5CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people47.662·94·+0.6
Coronary heart disease6.1%5838-0.3CDC PLACES
Current asthma10.4%5460-0.3CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.2%3636+0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63.9%9477+1.2CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying5.3646·40·-0.2IRS county migration flows
Depression22.8%5861-0.3CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.2%6259-0.5CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.10172·50·+0.7
Economic connectedness0.9778281+1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.54358·34·+0.1
Education score-1.117·5·-0.9
Effective property tax rate1.5574·90·+1.0Census ACS 5-year
Employed1,369———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents48.190·92·+1.0
Fair or poor self-rated health18.7%7461-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter6.64672-0.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.42%9453+1.4County Health Rankings
Food insecurity13.7%8267-0.8CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress18.5%5250-0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress13.1%7461-0.8CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.005158092-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.11216·44·-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4435454-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$193,420k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.090972·46·+0.7
Hearing disability7.5%4424-0.3CDC PLACES
High blood pressure32.8%4449+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.8%3455+0.4CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate79.1%70·78·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity11.9%7062-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units1,667———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate95841·46·-0.3
Income gap between arrivals and departures$11,85782·84·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability8.6%7252-0.6CDC PLACES
Jail admission rate1,12328·17·-0.4
Jail population rate47957·59·-0.2
Labour force1,407———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation7.8%7667-0.7CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support21.5%6778-0.7CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.10600-2.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy77.2 years9272+1.0County Health Rankings
Local income tax as a share of income0.0147—20·—Census local government finances
Local income tax collected$21k———Census local government finances
Loneliness31.5%6781-0.6CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents11.158·76·-0.0
Mammography in the past two years71.3%6830+0.5CDC PLACES
Material security score0.4688·62·+1.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$58,6543521-0.3IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$56,18668·54·+0.3IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$44,32932·21·-0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work19.5 min5482-0.3Census ACS 5-year
Median age44.1 years38·72·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$60410·6·-1.2Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$92,60034·6·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$53,546—24—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$53,6674823+0.0Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,43264·45·+0.4Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.126%7891+0.7Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations13.85673+0.1County Health Rankings
Mobility disability13.3%6249-0.5CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99314·44·-0.7Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.570·77·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-2.494·2·-1.9IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity27.1%5045-0.2CDC PLACES
Obesity40.5%2226+0.8CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units1,221———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents0.0742·20·-0.7
Owner-occupied housing units966———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return2,640———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return252·53·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move2,330———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,5956644+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$57,3846061+0.0BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$167,790k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,924———BEA Regional Accounts
Population2,920———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over2,438———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over2,286———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over2,099———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over728———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain341———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line339———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,873———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined2,873———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago2,656———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher452———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census2,939———
Poverty rate uncertain11.9%8463-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)11.8%9464-1.2Census SAIPE
Premature mortality uncertain4518657-0.7County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20001,890———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20041,800———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20081,586———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20121,483———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20161,464———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20201,579———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20241,507———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population0%7·2·-1.9
Preventable hospital stays4,98324+2.6County Health Rankings
Prison population rate47944·36·-0.5
Private job growth-2.4716·9·-0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs553———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03888896+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps8.7%12·17·-1.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents66.870·85·+0.5
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200073.468·88·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200477.878·91·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200877.686·93·+1.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201280.178·91·+0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201684.678·90·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202082.870·87·+0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202483.164·85·+0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20249.7342·51·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions2.17%54·27·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit13.8%24·40·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains26.8%90·93·+1.4IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%42·9·-0.9IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year74.4%86·39·+1.0CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%7253-0.7CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over24.9%48·86·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain9.8%16·19·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race4.21%35·40·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago90.8%78·82·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%97·83·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share never married25.1%48·29·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married55.7%62·72·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share of some other race, not Hispanic0%—53·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic uncertain2.63%28·29·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic92.1%82·81·+0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.39%78·91·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher21.5%6350+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours34.2%7676-0.8CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.92478·93·+0.7
Stroke3.1%6850-0.6CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication59.4%82·69·+1.0CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed1,380———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken3,821———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.4%5842-0.3CDC PLACES
Total population2,924———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score-0.031167-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed38———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate2.7%6879-0.8BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate26.8%60·85·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units446———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.6%8661-0.8CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50524———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,362———Census ACS 5-year

7of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.