placestats

Ontonagon County, MI

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population5870
Density1.7people per km² of land
Median household income$51,844
Land area3395km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Ontonagon County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: Huerfano County, CO, Lincoln County, NM, Sedgwick County, CO, Gregory County, SD, Roosevelt County, MT, Hitchcock County, NE, Lincoln County, KS, Trinity County, CA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Ontonagon Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Membership of volunteering groups0.244%100th pct100th pct +4.0 sd
Depression29.3%0th pct6th pct +2.4 sd
Share aged 65 and over37.8%98th pct by value100th pct by value +2.4 sd
Median age59.4 years98th pct by value100th pct by value +2.3 sd
Colorectal cancer screening61.2%98th pct80th pct +2.1 sd
Homeownership rate87.3%98th pct by value99th pct by value +2.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.4524471-0.2Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance7.3%9891-1.1CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work47,085 min———Census ACS 5-year
Alcohol-involved share of driving deaths0.714%102+1.2County Health Rankings
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over12.8%8467-1.0CDC PLACES
Any disability32%7248-0.6CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying4.6530·23·-0.6IRS county migration flows
Arthritis26.8%1020+1.5CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.156134+0.0Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking19.1%1827+0.5CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents084·45·-0.3
Business closing rate7.0418·20·-0.6Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments144———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed10———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate9.8650·59·+0.1Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer7.7%23+1.2CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents13.360·66·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain23.9%4823-0.0Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households uncertain0.141%6·9·-1.4County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort715———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income715———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening84%9870+1.7CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease8%1624+0.9CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability16.6%6846-0.5CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening61.2%9880+2.1CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people46.464·93·+0.6
Coronary heart disease6.3%4830-0.0CDC PLACES
Current asthma11.7%1211+1.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking17.7%2631+0.3CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year63.3%9274+1.1CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying4.098·9·-1.0IRS county migration flows
Depression29.3%06+2.4CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes10.1%8061-0.7CDC PLACES
Disability-free score0.093576·50·+0.8
Economic connectedness0.8916768+0.6Social Capital Atlas
Economy score0.31532·22·-0.3
Education score-0.5645·16·-0.3
Effective property tax rate1.2361·77·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,234———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents8.5922·18·-0.6
Fair or poor self-rated health19.2%7656-0.8CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter4.98696-1.0County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.28%3211-0.3County Health Rankings
Food insecurity15.8%5549-0.4CDC PLACES
Foreign-born population uncertain71———Census ACS 5-year
Frequent mental distress20.3%1418+1.1CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress14.2%6040-0.3CDC PLACES
Friending bias-0.0148894-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.15194·94·+1.8Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.4188480-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$165,600k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-0.22366·37·+0.3
Hearing disability7.2%7834-0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure33.1%4646+0.2CDC PLACES
High cholesterol31.2%5063+0.0CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate87.3%98·99·+2.1Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity12.4%6856-0.6CDC PLACES
Housing units5,256———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate73922·28·-0.5
Income gap between arrivals and departures$15,57190·89·+0.9IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability9.2%5840-0.3CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain1185023-0.1County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate1,22933·21·-0.4
Jail population rate38536·45·-0.3
Labour force2,385———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation8.7%5850-0.5CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support23.5%4253-0.0CDC PLACES
Learning rate uncertain-0.03843522-0.6Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy73.1 years2828-0.2County Health Rankings
Loneliness33.6%3955+0.4CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents1574·85·+0.6
Mammography in the past two years70.7%6826+0.4CDC PLACES
Material security score0.30974·53·+0.9
Mean adjusted gross income per return$54,3993012-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$56,98376·57·+0.5IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$41,41210·11·-0.8IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work26.1 min1236+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Median age59.4 years98·100·+2.3Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent$5712·4·-1.6Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$101,00040·9·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median household income$51,844—20—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$51,3063417-0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill1,24450·36·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.244%100100+4.0Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations8.534030-0.4County Health Rankings
Mobility disability12.8%8255-0.8CDC PLACES
Mutual-friend share0.99650·71·+0.2Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate2.8270·80·+0.5Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying0.5672·65·+0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity24.7%8264-0.8CDC PLACES
Obesity37.2%6659-0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,978———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents0100·78·—
Other religion adherents1.2952·38·-0.3
Owner-occupied housing units2,599———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,750———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return24·5·-1.8IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,282———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$32,7417444+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$49,6212832-0.5BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$290,630k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,857———BEA Regional Accounts
Population5,906———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over5,352———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over5,167———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,873———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over2,216———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line731———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line763———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,819———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,869———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,439———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher813———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census5,816———
Poverty rate12.6%8457-0.8Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)13%8454-1.1Census SAIPE
Premature mortality5236040-0.3County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20004,151———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20044,192———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,885———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,539———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20163,426———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,804———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20243,841———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population33.3%24·14·-0.8
Preventable hospital stays9729898-1.5County Health Rankings
Prison population rate35320·21·-0.8
Private job growth5.6788·89·+0.4BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs932———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.03818696+1.0Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps15.4%68·67·+0.3CDC PLACES
Religious adherents38.330·28·-0.6
Republican share of the two-party vote, 20006242·61·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200454.822·30·-0.8MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200848.122·24·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201254.626·32·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201663.726·36·-0.5MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202062.924·36·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202465.424·37·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20243.3614·30·-0.9MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions1.08%24·7·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit14.4%22·44·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains17.6%54·63·+0.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation4.68%90·90·+1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year77%94·71·+1.7CDC PLACES
Self-care disability3.6%8053-0.9CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over37.8%98·100·+2.4Census ACS 5-year
Share Asian, not Hispanic uncertain0.494%—27·—Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced13.2%48·70·+0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share foreign-born uncertain1.21%7·9·-1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race1.7%2·7·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.7%92·94·+1.3Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married21.7%22·9·-0.9Census ACS 5-year
Share now married56.1%74·75·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share of births to unmarried women uncertain80.8%—94·—Census ACS 5-year
Share of two or more races, not Hispanic3.34%50·52·-0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share separated uncertain1.23%—25·—Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic93.1%92·87·+1.1Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed9.04%76·88·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher16.7%2223-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours35.7%6065-0.3CDC PLACES
Social connection score0.72574·88·+0.7
Stroke3.2%5842-0.5CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication57%40·28·+0.1CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,780———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken5,919———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off9.2%7145-0.5CDC PLACES
Total population5,870———Census ACS 5-year
Unemployed151———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate6.3%44+1.9BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate43.3%92·97·+1.8Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units2,278———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability4.7%8458-0.9CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 50800———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute1,801———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost uncertain13,3712818+0.1County Health Rankings

10of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.