placestats

Randolph County, GA

A county, and one of the 3,222 county-level areas the Census Bureau reports for the United States.

Population6270
Density5.7people per km² of land
Median household income$25,425
Land area1109km²

Its peers

These are the 50 areas most like Randolph County in population density and median household income (the middle household income). Both are measured in percentage terms and put on the same scale, so neither one counts for more. The closest eight: East Carroll Parish, LA, Holmes County, MS, Wolfe County, KY, Owsley County, KY, McDowell County, WV, Greene County, AL, Allendale County, SC, Claiborne Parish, LA. The peer scores below compare this county with all 50.

Least like its peers

The measures where Randolph Countyis furthest from the average of its peers. The gap is shown in “sd” (standard deviations), which means typical gaps between peers: −2 sd is about two typical gaps below the peer average. A national ranking would hide these numbers behind the county’s income.

MeasureValueAmong peersNationallyvs peers
Homeownership rate49.5%2nd pct by value1st pct by value -1.9 sd
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%10th pct by value9th pct by value -1.7 sd
Prison population rate1,63395th pct by value97th pct by value +1.3 sd
Children in single-parent households0.666%84th pct by value100th pct by value +1.1 sd
Unemployment rate3.5%90th pct46th pct -1.1 sd
Economic connectedness0.4117th pct0th pct -1.1 sd

How it has changed

This chart covers 2010–2024. A few measures were published only once — the school, moving-up-the-income-ladder (mobility) and social-ties (social capital) ones. They show as a single point that says so. Everything else is drawn over the years its publisher covers. Each value sits at the year it describes, not the year it came out.

Loading…

Every measure

Rates and medians come first, then counts. Counts have no peer score. A county’s population cannot be high or low “for its peers” when the peers were picked partly by density. Density and median household income have no peer score either, since they are what the peers were picked by.

Adult income rank of children raised poor here0.335294-0.6Opportunity Atlas
Adults under 65 without health insurance17.8%298-0.0CDC PLACES
Aggregate travel time to work50,845 min———Census ACS 5-year
All natural teeth lost, age 65 and over34.1%251+0.7CDC PLACES
Any disability41.1%765-0.9CDC PLACES
Arrivals per 100 people staying5.6461·45·+0.2IRS county migration flows
Arthritis28.7%556-0.0CDC PLACES
Average test score-0.723322-0.5Stanford Education Data Archive
Binge drinking12%7499-0.8CDC PLACES
Black Protestant adherents1.1827·66·-1.0
Black-white residential segregation17.216·3·-0.9County Health Rankings
Business closing rate12.284·94·+0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments112———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments closed14———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business establishments opened9———Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Business opening rate7.8635·25·-0.3Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Cancer other than skin cancer5.7%3694+0.1CDC PLACES
Catholic adherents0.7837·11·-0.3
Child poverty rate, ages 0-17 uncertain40.8%432+0.1Census SAIPE
Children in single-parent households0.666%84·100·+1.1County Health Rankings
Children in the mobility cohort1,796———Opportunity Atlas
Children with below-median parental income1,796———Social Capital Atlas
Cholesterol screening82.7%6746+0.5CDC PLACES
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease10.3%432+0.0CDC PLACES
Cognitive disability21%677-0.7CDC PLACES
Colorectal cancer screening54%5921+0.3CDC PLACES
Congregations per 10,000 people37.453·84·+0.2
Coronary heart disease7.9%431-0.1CDC PLACES
Current asthma12.3%55+1.0CDC PLACES
Current cigarette smoking22.6%524-0.2CDC PLACES
Dental visit in the past year38.8%353+0.3CDC PLACES
Departures per 100 people staying7.0578·80·+0.6IRS county migration flows
Depression21.5%4876-0.2CDC PLACES
Diagnosed diabetes18.9%381+0.3CDC PLACES
Disability-free score-2.257·2·+0.2
Economic connectedness0.41170-1.1Social Capital Atlas
Economy score-0.45561·2·+0.3
Education score-1.5213·2·-0.7
Effective property tax rate uncertain0.8872·54·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Employed2,538———BLS LAUS
Evangelical Protestant adherents42.278·87·+0.7
Fair or poor self-rated health32.2%572-0.3CDC PLACES
Fine particulate matter8.71519+0.8County Health Rankings
Flu vaccination among Medicare enrollees0.37%8234+0.8County Health Rankings
Food insecurity37.3%431+0.1CDC PLACES
Frequent mental distress22.1%314+0.4CDC PLACES
Frequent physical distress18.3%262+0.2CDC PLACES
Friending bias0.06655648-0.1Social Capital Atlas
Friending clustering0.16965·98·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Gini index of income inequality0.5549-0.1Census ACS 5-year
Gross domestic product$241,360k———BEA Regional Accounts
Health score-1.0862·4·+0.4
Hearing disability7.1%8339-0.7CDC PLACES
High blood pressure45.9%552-0.1CDC PLACES
High cholesterol34.1%7619-0.5CDC PLACES
Homeownership rate49.5%2·1·-1.9Census ACS 5-year
Housing insecurity28.9%341+0.5CDC PLACES
Housing units3,573———Census ACS 5-year
Incarceration rate2,35665·94·-0.2
Income gap between arrivals and departures$-1,23633·32·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Independent-living disability15.2%311+0.5CDC PLACES
Injury deaths uncertain91.88358-0.7County Health Rankings
Jail admission rate6,34776·90·-0.1
Jail population rate72345·81·-0.5
Labour force2,629———BLS LAUS
Lack of reliable transportation19.3%401+0.3CDC PLACES
Lacking social and emotional support29.8%897-1.1CDC PLACES
Learning rate-0.0689104-0.9Stanford Education Data Archive
Life expectancy71.3 years7813+0.5County Health Rankings
Loneliness40.7%261+0.5CDC PLACES
Mainline Protestant adherents3.9549·28·-0.2
Mammography in the past two years71.4%4131+0.0CDC PLACES
Material security score-2.351·1·-0.0
Mean adjusted gross income per return$46,833472-0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Mean income of arriving households$36,10437·3·-0.4IRS county migration flows
Mean income of departing households$37,34045·4·-0.1IRS county migration flows
Mean travel time to work23.3 min7457-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Median age37.6 years20·18·-0.7Census ACS 5-year
Median gross rent uncertain$55415·3·-1.0Census ACS 5-year
Median home value$90,90080·5·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Median household income uncertain$25,425—2—Census ACS 5-year
Median household income (model-based)$39,926552+0.3Census SAIPE
Median property tax bill uncertain80075·17·+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Membership of volunteering groups0.021%201-0.8Social Capital Atlas
Membership organisations11.47656+0.8County Health Rankings
Mobility disability22%501-0.1CDC PLACES
Motor vehicle crash deaths uncertain36.2536-0.2County Health Rankings
Mutual-friend share0.99957·95·+0.4Social Capital Atlas
Net business formation rate-4.3716·4·-0.9Census Business Dynamics Statistics
Net migration per 100 people staying-1.4235·6·-0.4IRS county migration flows
No leisure-time physical activity39.5%642-0.4CDC PLACES
Obesity46.5%522-0.2CDC PLACES
Occupied housing units2,644———Census ACS 5-year
Orthodox Christian adherents098·78·-0.1
Other religion adherents3.1384·72·+0.8
Owner-occupied housing units1,310———Census ACS 5-year
People covered by a tax return4,550———IRS Statistics of Income
People per tax return218·46·-0.7IRS Statistics of Income
People who did not move4,097———IRS county migration flows
Per capita income$21,280464-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Per capita personal income$45,9657419+0.4BEA Regional Accounts
Personal income$280,980k———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,113———BEA Regional Accounts
Population6,078———County Health Rankings
Population aged 15 and over4,834———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 18 and over4,809———CDC PLACES
Population aged 25 and over4,243———Census ACS 5-year
Population aged 65 and over1,315———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line uncertain1,628———Census ACS 5-year
Population below the poverty line1,581———Census SAIPE
Population for whom poverty status is determined6,073———Census ACS 5-year
Population for whom poverty status is determined5,921———Census SAIPE
Population in the same house one year ago5,822———Census ACS 5-year
Population with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain637———Census ACS 5-year
Population, decennial census6,425———
Poverty rate uncertain26.8%746-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Poverty rate (model-based)26.7%743-0.7Census SAIPE
Premature mortality773515-0.2County Health Rankings
Presidential votes cast, 20002,569———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20043,047———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20083,215———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20123,058———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20162,899———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20203,074———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Presidential votes cast, 20242,990———MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Pretrial share of the jail population68.3%68·56·+0.7
Preventable hospital stays3,9424413+0.0County Health Rankings
Prison population rate1,63395·97·+1.3
Private job growth1.962·54·+0.1BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Private jobs1,447———BLS Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
Public-good pages per 1,000 users0.01888257+0.9Social Capital Atlas
Received food stamps38.1%83·100·+1.0CDC PLACES
Religious adherents51.247·59·+0.0
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200045.960·14·+0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200446.858·13·+0.2MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 200842.854·14·+0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201241.854·11·-0.0MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 201644.355·11·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202045.451·13·-0.1MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican share of the two-party vote, 202446.244·11·-0.3MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Republican swing, 2000 to 20240.21825·21·-0.7MIT Election Data and Science Lab
Returns claiming charitable contributions3.75%69·60·+0.5IRS Statistics of Income
Returns claiming the earned income credit36.3%67·99·+0.2IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting capital gains9.17%90·15·+1.1IRS Statistics of Income
Returns reporting unemployment compensation0%10·9·-1.7IRS Statistics of Income
Routine checkup in the past year79.6%45·94·+0.2CDC PLACES
Self-care disability8.1%331+0.4CDC PLACES
Share aged 65 and over21%66·63·+0.3Census ACS 5-year
Share American Indian or Alaska Native, not Hispanic0%—24·—Census ACS 5-year
Share Black, not Hispanic67.7%71·99·+0.7Census ACS 5-year
Share divorced uncertain13.4%71·74·+0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share Hispanic or Latino, any race uncertain3.56%63·33·-0.5Census ACS 5-year
Share in the same house a year ago92.9%80·94·+0.8Census ACS 5-year
Share Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, not Hispanic0%100·83·—Census ACS 5-year
Share never married40.6%50·92·+0.2Census ACS 5-year
Share now married36.8%42·4·-0.4Census ACS 5-year
Share White, not Hispanic27.3%37·4·-0.6Census ACS 5-year
Share widowed uncertain9.16%53·89·-0.0Census ACS 5-year
Share with a bachelor's degree or higher uncertain15%7614+0.6Census ACS 5-year
Sleeping less than 7 hours45.2%412+0.2CDC PLACES
Social connection score-1.0463·4·+0.3
Stroke5.5%361+0.3CDC PLACES
Taking blood pressure medication66.9%64·99·+0.5CDC PLACES
Tax returns filed2,400———IRS Statistics of Income
Tests taken9,747———Stanford Education Data Archive
Threat of utility shut-off22.2%401+0.4CDC PLACES
Total population6,270———Census ACS 5-year
Trend in average test score uncertain-0.01066036+0.1Stanford Education Data Archive
Unemployed91———BLS LAUS
Unemployment rate3.5%9046-1.1BLS LAUS
Vacancy rate26%66·84·+0.1Census ACS 5-year
Vacant housing units929———Census ACS 5-year
Vision disability10.5%432+0.0CDC PLACES
Women aged 15 to 501,184———Census ACS 5-year
Workers aged 16 and over who commute2,181———Census ACS 5-year
Years of potential life lost17,238444+0.0County Health Rankings

15of these values are marked uncertain. Either the published margin of error (the likely range around a survey estimate) is wide compared with the estimate, or the value was split across Connecticut’s 2022 boundary change. A split value is shared out between old and new areas, not measured directly.

A percentile is the share of the comparison group at or below this county’s value. A peer score needs at least 20 peers with published data. Where fewer report, the cell is left blank instead of being worked out from a handful.